The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words.


Journal

Behavior research methods
ISSN: 1554-3528
Titre abrégé: Behav Res Methods
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101244316

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 14 12 2019
medline: 15 12 2020
entrez: 14 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Sensorimotor information plays a fundamental role in cognition. However, the existing materials that measure the sensorimotor basis of word meanings and concepts have been restricted in terms of their sample size and breadth of sensorimotor experience. Here we present norms of sensorimotor strength for 39,707 concepts across six perceptual modalities (touch, hearing, smell, taste, vision, and interoception) and five action effectors (mouth/throat, hand/arm, foot/leg, head excluding mouth/throat, and torso), gathered from a total of 3,500 individual participants using Amazon's Mechanical Turk platform. The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms are unique and innovative in a number of respects: They represent the largest-ever set of semantic norms for English, at 40,000 words × 11 dimensions (plus several informative cross-dimensional variables), they extend perceptual strength norming to the new modality of interoception, and they include the first norming of action strength across separate bodily effectors. In the first study, we describe the data collection procedures, provide summary descriptives of the dataset, and interpret the relations observed between sensorimotor dimensions. We then report two further studies, in which we (1) extracted an optimal single-variable composite of the 11-dimension sensorimotor profile (Minkowski 3 strength) and (2) demonstrated the utility of both perceptual and action strength in facilitating lexical decision times and accuracy in two separate datasets. These norms provide a valuable resource to researchers in diverse areas, including psycholinguistics, grounded cognition, cognitive semantics, knowledge representation, machine learning, and big-data approaches to the analysis of language and conceptual representations. The data are accessible via the Open Science Framework (http://osf.io/7emr6/) and an interactive web application (https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/psychology/lsnorms/).

Identifiants

pubmed: 31832879
doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
pii: 10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
pmc: PMC7280349
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1271-1291

Références

Behav Res Methods. 2005 Nov;37(4):547-59
pubmed: 16629288
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jul;51(8):1510-7
pubmed: 23624313
J Exp Psychol. 1968 Jan;76(1):Suppl:1-25
pubmed: 5672258
Behav Brain Res. 2017 Jun 15;328:149-158
pubmed: 28389341
Neuron. 2004 Jan 22;41(2):301-7
pubmed: 14741110
Behav Res Methods. 2007 Aug;39(3):445-59
pubmed: 17958156
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 14;9:1433
pubmed: 30154747
Can J Exp Psychol. 2017 Mar;71(1):14-22
pubmed: 27455062
Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11
pubmed: 24142837
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Jun;149:32-9
pubmed: 24657828
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Feb;63(2):330-6
pubmed: 11281107
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Feb;135(1):1-11
pubmed: 16478313
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):558-64
pubmed: 19363198
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Aug;19(8):1905-14
pubmed: 19068489
J Psycholinguist Res. 2018 Jun;47(3):641-661
pubmed: 29282595
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752):
pubmed: 29915011
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Mar;43(1):145-54
pubmed: 21287109
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Nov;40(4):1075-8
pubmed: 19001398
Cognition. 2010 Apr;115(1):1-9
pubmed: 19903564
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):453-466
pubmed: 30484218
Cogn Sci. 2011 Mar;35(2):381-98
pubmed: 21429005
Top Cogn Sci. 2014 Jul;6(3):390-406
pubmed: 24895329
J Neurosci. 2006 Jun 7;26(23):6288-97
pubmed: 16763036
Cognition. 2012 Dec;125(3):452-65
pubmed: 22935248
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):1028-41
pubmed: 22729692
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):433-442
pubmed: 27071389
Front Psychol. 2012 Nov 02;3:474
pubmed: 23130012
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 29;7:1116
pubmed: 27524974
Behav Res Methods. 2008 Feb;40(1):183-90
pubmed: 18411541
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):516-26
pubmed: 23055172
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan;4(1):103-20
pubmed: 22253184
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;13(4):500-5
pubmed: 12965300
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Dec;49(6):2204-2218
pubmed: 28155185
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Oct;166(3-4):370-92
pubmed: 16086144
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33321
pubmed: 22428020
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006 Sep;6(3):214-22
pubmed: 17243357
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Dec;9(4):625-36
pubmed: 12613670
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Oct;100(4):1800-12
pubmed: 18684903
Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul 8;30(4):733-44
pubmed: 21702833
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0211336
pubmed: 30785906
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):287-304
pubmed: 21720920
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Jun;51(3):1258-1270
pubmed: 30206797
Cortex. 2012 Jul;48(7):905-22
pubmed: 21601842
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 May 7;278(1710):1365-72
pubmed: 20961902
Kybernetik. 1974;16(2):65-7
pubmed: 4453110
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 May-Jun;33(3-4):130-74
pubmed: 27310469
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Aug;42(8):1218-32
pubmed: 26866656
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Apr;143(2):527-33
pubmed: 24099578
Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Aug;22(4):577-609; discussion 610-60
pubmed: 11301525
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1065-1081
pubmed: 24490848
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Mar;45(1):160-8
pubmed: 22936106
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:213-220
pubmed: 29966914
Eur J Neurosci. 2005 Feb;21(3):793-7
pubmed: 15733097
Vision Res. 1981;21(3):409-18
pubmed: 7269319
Artif Life. 2005 Winter-Spring;11(1-2):13-29
pubmed: 15811218
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):384-7
pubmed: 15641427
Cognition. 2008 Jan;106(1):433-43
pubmed: 17258186
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1389-400
pubmed: 15900932
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 1;49(1):782-93
pubmed: 19660559

Auteurs

Dermot Lynott (D)

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. d.lynott@lancaster.ac.uk.

Louise Connell (L)

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK. l.connell@lancaster.ac.uk.

Marc Brysbaert (M)

Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

James Brand (J)

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
New Zealand Institute of Language Brain and Behaviour, University of Canterbury, Canterbury, New Zealand.

James Carney (J)

Department of Psychology, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.
Department of Arts and Humanities, Brunel University London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH