AUTOMATED RETINAL LAYER SEGMENTATION AND THEIR THICKNESS PROFILES IN HEALTHY SUBJECTS: A Comparison of 55° Wide-field and Conventional 30° Spectral Domain-Optical Coherence Tomography.
Journal
Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.)
ISSN: 1539-2864
Titre abrégé: Retina
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Oct 2020
Oct 2020
Historique:
pubmed:
14
12
2019
medline:
11
9
2021
entrez:
14
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess whether retinal thickness measurements with a standard 30° spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) are comparable with wide-field 55° SD-OCT. Thirty-three healthy individuals were scanned using 55° as well as 30° SD-OCT according to a standardized protocol. Automated retinal layer segmentation of standard and wide-field SD-OCTs was assessed using customized software. Both lenses showed a high correlation when analyzing total retinal thickness within the central, the inner, and the outer retinal ring (r = > 0.9). Automated thickness measurements with the 55° system were marginally higher compared with the 30° lens. The thickness of each separate retinal layer using automated segmentation showed excellent correlations within the inner and outer rings (range: r = 0.6-r = 0.9 for the inner ring and range: r = 0.9-r = 1.0 for the outer ring). Fifty-five degree wide-field SD-OCT provides a good overview of the posterior pole and presents similar quantitative values as a standard 30° OCT lens. Therefore, thickness values are comparable when switching between these two lenses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31834134
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002714
pmc: PMC7505155
pii: 00006982-202010000-00018
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2004-2009Références
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129005
pubmed: 26076457
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;167:10-7
pubmed: 27084000
Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Apr 02;6(5):1534-52
pubmed: 26137363
Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1178-81
pubmed: 1957169
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;35(2):167-71
pubmed: 25552349
J Diabetes Res. 2013;2013:905058
pubmed: 23841106
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb;101(2):160-165
pubmed: 27170518
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Nov 1;57(14):6455-6460
pubmed: 27893887
Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(3):145-152
pubmed: 28171859
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 14;53(6):2715-9
pubmed: 22427582
Opt Express. 2009 Mar 2;17(5):4019-36
pubmed: 19259243
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Sep 01;52(9):6925-33
pubmed: 21791591