Microvascular anastomosis using loupes and smartphone magnification: Experimental study for application to limited-resource environments.


Journal

Hand surgery & rehabilitation
ISSN: 2468-1210
Titre abrégé: Hand Surg Rehabil
Pays: France
ID NLM: 101681801

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2020
Historique:
received: 30 07 2019
revised: 25 10 2019
accepted: 04 11 2019
pubmed: 15 12 2019
medline: 5 8 2021
entrez: 15 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Finger revascularization has been performed without a microscope in limited-resource environments only when absolutely necessary. This experimental study sought to assess the feasibility of microvascular anastomosis in rats performed using loupes or smartphone magnification. Thirty rats were divided into three groups of 10 individuals according to the magnification method used: operating microscope (control group M), surgical loupes (group L) and smartphone (group S). The infrarenal aorta was dissected under a microscope, then anastomosed by interrupted sutures using the group-specific magnifying device. The main analytical criteria were vessel diameter, anastomosis duration, immediate flow patency (T0), patency after one hour (T1) and anastomosis quality. Anastomosis duration was comparable between groups M and L, but was twice as long in group S. The number of leaks at clamp removal was higher in group S. Patency rates at T0 and T1 were 100% in groups M and L, but were significantly lower in group S. The anastomosis quality was low in group L and poor in group S. Anastomosis of digital arteries using loupes is possible, but the resulting quality is lower than with a microscope. Current smartphones are not adequate for performslt ing microvascular repairs in a living model.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31837489
pii: S2468-1229(19)30365-2
doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.11.004
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

92-95

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Auteurs

A Ghabi (A)

Department of orthopedic, trauma and reconstructive surgery, Percy Military Hospital, 101, avenue Henri-Barbusse, 92140 Clamart, France.

S Amar (S)

Department of orthopedic, trauma and reconstructive surgery, Percy Military Hospital, 101, avenue Henri-Barbusse, 92140 Clamart, France.

M Harion (M)

Pediatric department, Bicêtre French Hospital, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.

J Legagneux (J)

Microsurgery laboratory, Surgical school, Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé - Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, 7, rue du Fer-à-Moulin, 75005 Paris, France.

J-L Vignes (JL)

Microsurgery laboratory, Surgical school, Agence Générale des Equipements et Produits de Santé - Assistance publique des Hôpitaux de Paris, 7, rue du Fer-à-Moulin, 75005 Paris, France.

L Mathieu (L)

Department of orthopedic, trauma and reconstructive surgery, Percy Military Hospital, 101, avenue Henri-Barbusse, 92140 Clamart, France; Department of surgery, French Military Health Service Academy, École du Val-de-Grâce, 1, place Alphonse-Laveran, 75005 Paris, France. Electronic address: laurent_tom2@yahoo.fr.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH