Comparison of Software Tools for Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Data Processing in Nontarget Screening of Environmental Samples.


Journal

Analytical chemistry
ISSN: 1520-6882
Titre abrégé: Anal Chem
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 01 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 17 12 2019
medline: 17 12 2019
entrez: 17 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The field of high-resolution mass spectrometry has undergone a rapid progress in the last years due to instrumental improvements leading to a higher sensitivity and selectivity of instruments. A variety of qualitative screening approaches, summarized as nontarget screening, have been introduced and have successfully extended the environmental monitoring of organic micropollutants. Several automated data processing workflows have been developed to handle the immense amount of data that are recorded in short time frames by these methods. Most data processing workflows include similar steps, but underlying algorithms and implementation of different processing steps vary. In this study the consistency of data processing with different software tools was investigated. For this purpose, the same raw data files were processed with the software packages MZmine2, enviMass, Compound Discoverer, and XCMS online and resulting feature lists were compared. Results show a low coherence between different processing tools, as overlap of features between all four programs was around 10%, and for each software between 40% and 55% of features did not match with any other program. The implementation of replicate and blank filter was identified as one of the sources of observed divergences. However, there is a need for a better understanding and user instructions on the influence of different algorithms and settings on feature extraction and following filtering steps. In future studies it would be of interest to investigate how final data interpretation is influenced by different processing software. With this work we want to encourage more awareness on data processing as a crucial step in the workflow of nontarget screening.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31840499
doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04095
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1898-1907

Auteurs

Lotta L Hohrenk (LL)

Instrumental Analytical Chemistry , University of Duisburg-Essen , Universitätsstrasse 5 , D-45141 Essen , Germany.
Centre for Water and Environmental Research , University of Duisburg-Essen , Universitätsstrasse 2 , 45141 Essen , Germany.

Fabian Itzel (F)

Institut für Energie- und Umwelttechnik e. V. , Bliersheimer Strasse 58-60 , 47229 Duisburg , Germany.
Centre for Water and Environmental Research , University of Duisburg-Essen , Universitätsstrasse 2 , 45141 Essen , Germany.

Nicolai Baetz (N)

Instrumental Analytical Chemistry , University of Duisburg-Essen , Universitätsstrasse 5 , D-45141 Essen , Germany.
Institut für Energie- und Umwelttechnik e. V. , Bliersheimer Strasse 58-60 , 47229 Duisburg , Germany.

Jochen Tuerk (J)

Institut für Energie- und Umwelttechnik e. V. , Bliersheimer Strasse 58-60 , 47229 Duisburg , Germany.
Centre for Water and Environmental Research , University of Duisburg-Essen , Universitätsstrasse 2 , 45141 Essen , Germany.

Maryam Vosough (M)

Department of Clean Technologies, Chemistry and Chemical Engineering , Research Center of Iran , P.O. Box 14335-186, Tehran 1496813151 , Iran.

Torsten C Schmidt (TC)

Instrumental Analytical Chemistry , University of Duisburg-Essen , Universitätsstrasse 5 , D-45141 Essen , Germany.
Centre for Water and Environmental Research , University of Duisburg-Essen , Universitätsstrasse 2 , 45141 Essen , Germany.
IWW Water Center , Moritzstrasse 26 , 45476 Mülheim an der Ruhr , Germany.

Classifications MeSH