Going upstream - an umbrella review of the macroeconomic determinants of health and health inequalities.
Economic policy
Economy
Health inequalities
Macroeconomy
Population health
Public health
Regulation
Social determinants of health
Journal
BMC public health
ISSN: 1471-2458
Titre abrégé: BMC Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968562
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Dec 2019
17 Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
19
08
2019
accepted:
04
11
2019
entrez:
18
12
2019
pubmed:
18
12
2019
medline:
5
3
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The social determinants of health have been widely recognised yet there remains a lack of clarity regarding what constitute the macro-economic determinants of health and what can be done to address them. An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted to identify the evidence for the health and health inequalities impact of population level macroeconomic factors, strategies, policies and interventions. Nine databases were searched for systematic reviews meeting the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria using a novel conceptual framework. Studies were assessed for quality using a standardised instrument and a narrative overview of the findings is presented. The review found a large (n = 62) but low quality systematic review-level evidence base. The results indicated that action to promote employment and improve working conditions can help improve health and reduce gender-based health inequalities. Evidence suggests that market regulation of tobacco, alcohol and food is likely to be effective at improving health and reducing inequalities in health including strong taxation, or restriction of advertising and availability. Privatisation of utilities and alcohol sectors, income inequality, and economic crises are likely to increase health inequalities. Left of centre governments and welfare state generosity may have a positive health impact, but evidence on specific welfare interventions is mixed. Trade and trade policies were found to have a mixed effect. There were no systematic reviews of the health impact of monetary policy or of large economic institutions such as central banks and regulatory organisations. The results of this study provide a simple yet comprehensive framework to support policy-makers and practitioners in addressing the macroeconomic determinants of health. Further research is needed in low and middle income countries and further reviews are needed to summarise evidence in key gaps identified by this review. Protocol for umbrella review prospectively registered with PROSPERO CRD42017068357.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The social determinants of health have been widely recognised yet there remains a lack of clarity regarding what constitute the macro-economic determinants of health and what can be done to address them. An umbrella review of systematic reviews was conducted to identify the evidence for the health and health inequalities impact of population level macroeconomic factors, strategies, policies and interventions.
METHODS
METHODS
Nine databases were searched for systematic reviews meeting the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) criteria using a novel conceptual framework. Studies were assessed for quality using a standardised instrument and a narrative overview of the findings is presented.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The review found a large (n = 62) but low quality systematic review-level evidence base. The results indicated that action to promote employment and improve working conditions can help improve health and reduce gender-based health inequalities. Evidence suggests that market regulation of tobacco, alcohol and food is likely to be effective at improving health and reducing inequalities in health including strong taxation, or restriction of advertising and availability. Privatisation of utilities and alcohol sectors, income inequality, and economic crises are likely to increase health inequalities. Left of centre governments and welfare state generosity may have a positive health impact, but evidence on specific welfare interventions is mixed. Trade and trade policies were found to have a mixed effect. There were no systematic reviews of the health impact of monetary policy or of large economic institutions such as central banks and regulatory organisations.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this study provide a simple yet comprehensive framework to support policy-makers and practitioners in addressing the macroeconomic determinants of health. Further research is needed in low and middle income countries and further reviews are needed to summarise evidence in key gaps identified by this review.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
Protocol for umbrella review prospectively registered with PROSPERO CRD42017068357.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31842835
doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7895-6
pii: 10.1186/s12889-019-7895-6
pmc: PMC6915896
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1678Subventions
Organisme : Norwegian Research Council
ID : 288638
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : NIHR CLAHRC NWC
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
ID : ACF-2015-21-024
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 215654/Z/19/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 106554/Z/14/Z
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/K02325X/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Fuse - funded by British Heart Foundation, Cancer Research UK, Economic and Social Research Council, Medical Research Council and the National Institute for Health Research, under the auspices of the UK Clinical Research Collaboration
ID : [MR/K02325X/1]
Références
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007 Oct;61(10):862-70
pubmed: 17873221
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 11;(9):CD011247
pubmed: 26360970
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008
pubmed: 28935701
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0123117
pubmed: 25905629
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2016 Mar;39(3):157-165
pubmed: 27754525
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Jun;11(6):6528-46
pubmed: 25019121
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Aug;162:88-96
pubmed: 27343818
Can J Public Health. 2018 Dec;109(5-6):779-781
pubmed: 29981108
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 May 1;138:7-16
pubmed: 24674707
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;3(8):774-783
pubmed: 27475770
Health Promot Int. 2014 Jun;29 Suppl 1:i17-8
pubmed: 25217353
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Jun 18;2:451-462
pubmed: 29349160
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;131:131-46
pubmed: 25771482
Soc Sci Med. 2015 May;132:88-94
pubmed: 25795992
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Jun 1;27(3):397-404
pubmed: 28549140
Int J Clin Pract. 2009 Aug;63(8):1128-35
pubmed: 19624782
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 13;18(1):869
pubmed: 30005611
Prev Med. 2013 Oct;57(4):278-96
pubmed: 23811528
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jul;75(1):129-37
pubmed: 22521678
J R Soc Med. 2013 Oct;106(10):408-14
pubmed: 23824332
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Feb;67(2):190-3
pubmed: 22875078
BMC Public Health. 2013 Dec 27;13:1234
pubmed: 24369852
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Mar 1;40(1):3-7
pubmed: 28158715
Am J Public Health. 2019 Jun;109(6):e1-e12
pubmed: 31067117
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2):217-29
pubmed: 20117579
Natl Med J India. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):277-281
pubmed: 28098082
Health Policy. 2012 Feb;104(2):99-127
pubmed: 22137444
Child Care Health Dev. 2004 Nov;30(6):699-709
pubmed: 15527480
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 14;15:887
pubmed: 26369695
Global Health. 2017 Mar 8;13(1):13
pubmed: 28274238
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1992 Jan-Feb;68(1):17-24
pubmed: 1555023
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:182-93
pubmed: 25037852
Soc Sci Med. 2012 Apr;74(8):1204-12
pubmed: 22365939
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 May;66(5):397-409
pubmed: 22080814
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Sep 05;2(9):e420-e437
pubmed: 28944313
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2010 Apr;64(4):284-91
pubmed: 19692738
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Aug 1;88(8):609-14
pubmed: 20680126
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 19;17(1):583
pubmed: 28629470
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):418-27
pubmed: 22424256
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;130:32-41
pubmed: 25680101
Nutrition. 2015 Jun;31(6):787-95
pubmed: 25933484
Int Psychogeriatr. 2012 Aug;24(8):1207-25
pubmed: 22300529
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e013497
pubmed: 28588106
Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:152-77
pubmed: 19474091
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001353
pubmed: 23239943
Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(2):97-105
pubmed: 11953787
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 20;8:CD009820
pubmed: 28823111
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e51333
pubmed: 23341881
Popul Stud (Camb). 1975 Jul;29:231-48
pubmed: 11630494
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(3):1259-75
pubmed: 25735366
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Mar;152:9-17
pubmed: 26820112
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 07;16:528
pubmed: 27386860
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 07;10(4):e0123182
pubmed: 25849962
BMC Public Health. 2012 Dec 21;12:1099
pubmed: 23256601
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2013 Jun;110(23-24):413-9
pubmed: 23837086
Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):937-44
pubmed: 26318852
J Public Health (Oxf). 2015 Sep;37(3):515-20
pubmed: 25266281
Qual Life Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):577-596
pubmed: 29067589
Lancet. 2012 Sep 15;380(9846):1011-29
pubmed: 22964159
BMJ. 2016 Sep 06;354:i4588
pubmed: 27601477
Scand J Public Health. 2019 Aug;47(6):655-665
pubmed: 31068103
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Apr 21;12:983-93
pubmed: 27143898
Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 08;5:57
pubmed: 27059307
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 06;(8):CD009963
pubmed: 23921458
Am J Prev Med. 2000 May;18(4 Suppl):23-6
pubmed: 10793277
BMJ. 2009 Nov 10;339:b4471
pubmed: 19903981
Am J Public Health. 2010 Nov;100(11):2270-8
pubmed: 20864710
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e020886
pubmed: 30341112
Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;6(1):222
pubmed: 29100497
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Feb;60(2):108-15
pubmed: 16415258
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Dec;60(4):407-52
pubmed: 14677219
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 Oct 10;9(10):3540-74
pubmed: 23202762
Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36:31-48
pubmed: 24025349
Milbank Q. 2018 Sep;96(3):472-498
pubmed: 30277610
Health Policy. 2014 Apr;115(2-3):111-9
pubmed: 24589039
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20724
pubmed: 21695209