Remote ischemic preconditioning and its role in the prevention of new onset atrial fibrillation post-cardiac surgery. A meta-analysis of randomized control trials.
meta‐analysis
new onset atrial fibrillation
remote ischemic preconditioning
Journal
Journal of arrhythmia
ISSN: 1880-4276
Titre abrégé: J Arrhythm
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101263026
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
22
08
2019
revised:
07
09
2019
accepted:
22
09
2019
entrez:
18
12
2019
pubmed:
18
12
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The denouement of remote ischemic preconditioning on new onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) post-cardiac surgery is not well-established. An updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials was performed by comparing remote ischemic preconditioning with controls and the outcome of interest was NOAF. The systemic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred reporting items for systemic review) and AHA (American Heart Association) guidelines Twelve randomized control trials were included in the final analysis. Remote ischemic preconditioning did not alter the risk of NOAF post-cardiac surgery [RR: 0.95, CI: 0.83-1.09, In conclusion, the present meta-analysis failed to provide any evidence for the beneficial effect of remote ischemic preconditioning in the prevention of NOAF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The denouement of remote ischemic preconditioning on new onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) post-cardiac surgery is not well-established. An updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials was performed by comparing remote ischemic preconditioning with controls and the outcome of interest was NOAF.
METHODS
METHODS
The systemic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred reporting items for systemic review) and AHA (American Heart Association) guidelines
RESULTS
RESULTS
Twelve randomized control trials were included in the final analysis. Remote ischemic preconditioning did not alter the risk of NOAF post-cardiac surgery [RR: 0.95, CI: 0.83-1.09,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the present meta-analysis failed to provide any evidence for the beneficial effect of remote ischemic preconditioning in the prevention of NOAF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31844467
doi: 10.1002/joa3.12252
pii: JOA312252
pmc: PMC6898524
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
789-794Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.
Références
Anesthesiology. 2012 Feb;116(2):296-310
pubmed: 22222469
Circulation. 2017 Sep 5;136(10):e172-e194
pubmed: 28784624
PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097
pubmed: 19621072
JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1720-9
pubmed: 15082699
Heart Rhythm. 2020 Jan;17(1):3-9
pubmed: 31356986
Circ Res. 2014 Feb 28;114(5):851-9
pubmed: 24371264
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Dec 15;177(2):409-17
pubmed: 25456576
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1408-17
pubmed: 26436207
Heart. 2015 Feb;101(3):185-92
pubmed: 25252696
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jan;35(3):176-83
pubmed: 24014392
Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11 Suppl):S53-9
pubmed: 20837926
PLoS One. 2013 May 31;8(5):e64743
pubmed: 23741380
World J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 26;8(10):615-622
pubmed: 27847563
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1397-407
pubmed: 26436208
Clin Sci (Lond). 2010 Apr 20;119(2):87-95
pubmed: 20218970
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2015 Jun;49(3):117-22
pubmed: 25613907
Open Heart. 2018 Nov 10;5(2):e000891
pubmed: 30487981
Avicenna J Med. 2012 Jul;2(3):65-70
pubmed: 23826549
J Arrhythm. 2019 Oct 31;35(6):789-794
pubmed: 31844467
Iran J Med Sci. 2018 Nov;43(6):587-595
pubmed: 30510335