Group based video-conferencing for adults with depression: findings from a user-led qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation.
Participatory analysis
Participatory theme elicitation
User involvement
Journal
Research involvement and engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Titre abrégé: Res Involv Engagem
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101708164
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
04
06
2019
accepted:
21
11
2019
entrez:
18
12
2019
pubmed:
18
12
2019
medline:
18
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Accessing support services for depression has been historically difficult given the societal stigma that exists regarding the condition. Recent advances in digital technologies continue to be postulated as a potential panacea yet the results from research trials have been mixed with a range of effect sizes. This article offers a different perspective by presenting a panel of end users (co-researchers) with qualitative interview data ( Co-researchers reported that while VC based interventions appeared convenient, accessible and relatively low cost - additional training and support should be offered to improve uptake and retention. In addition, co-researchers suggested that further exploration is needed regarding the level of self-awareness one feels in a group based VC environment and whether this facilitates disclosure (through disinhibition) or increases anxiety. The findings presented here appear to support existing (researcher and academic-led) literature in the field as well as suggest new areas for investigation. By presenting data generated solely by co-researchers, this article also adds to the evidence surrounding participatory analysis methods - particularly the growing need for robust approaches that are accessible and less time-consuming than those currently available. NCT03288506 (Clinicaltrials.gov) 20th Sept 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03288506.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Accessing support services for depression has been historically difficult given the societal stigma that exists regarding the condition. Recent advances in digital technologies continue to be postulated as a potential panacea yet the results from research trials have been mixed with a range of effect sizes.
METHODS
METHODS
This article offers a different perspective by presenting a panel of end users (co-researchers) with qualitative interview data (
RESULTS
RESULTS
Co-researchers reported that while VC based interventions appeared convenient, accessible and relatively low cost - additional training and support should be offered to improve uptake and retention. In addition, co-researchers suggested that further exploration is needed regarding the level of self-awareness one feels in a group based VC environment and whether this facilitates disclosure (through disinhibition) or increases anxiety.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The findings presented here appear to support existing (researcher and academic-led) literature in the field as well as suggest new areas for investigation. By presenting data generated solely by co-researchers, this article also adds to the evidence surrounding participatory analysis methods - particularly the growing need for robust approaches that are accessible and less time-consuming than those currently available.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
BACKGROUND
NCT03288506 (Clinicaltrials.gov) 20th Sept 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03288506.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31844555
doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0173-z
pii: 173
pmc: PMC6896757
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03288506']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
40Informations de copyright
© The Author(s). 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsThe Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Références
Behav Res Ther. 2012 Nov;50(11):675-84
pubmed: 22982082
Qual Health Res. 2005 Dec;15(10):1392-410
pubmed: 16263919
Telemed J E Health. 2006 Jun;12(3):341-50
pubmed: 16796502
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):7821-6
pubmed: 12060727
J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Dec;22(8):483-488
pubmed: 27799452
Ehealth Telecommun Syst Netw. 2016 Jun;5(2):39-56
pubmed: 29104830
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 07;(9):CD002098
pubmed: 26343551
Trials. 2017 Nov 23;18(1):559
pubmed: 29169378
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 5;150(2):320-9
pubmed: 23706876
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr 20;17(1):293
pubmed: 28424061
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Oct;78(5):746-50
pubmed: 20873910
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Jan;27(1):23-33
pubmed: 24293223
J Anxiety Disord. 2013 May;27(4):389-97
pubmed: 23764124
J Urban Health. 2007 Nov;84(6):814-28
pubmed: 17786561
Multivariate Behav Res. 1975 Oct 1;10(4):489-502
pubmed: 26750321
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 23;4(7):e005234
pubmed: 25056972
BMC Public Health. 2017 Sep 4;17(1):689
pubmed: 28870192
Telemed J E Health. 2012 May;18(4):297-304
pubmed: 22424078
Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):e89-99
pubmed: 22958162
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Dementia (London). 2019 Feb;18(2):701-712
pubmed: 28133983
Res Involv Engagem. 2016 Aug 20;2:29
pubmed: 29507764
Can Nurse. 2008 Sep;104(7):22-7
pubmed: 18856224
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Jun;7(3):321-6
pubmed: 15257832
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2016 Sep;37(9):651-659
pubmed: 27192032
Can J Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;54(9):596-604
pubmed: 19751548
J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Apr;18(3):125-7
pubmed: 22362829
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 10;10:233
pubmed: 20696073
J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2017 Feb 01;4:2055668317692755
pubmed: 31186923
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;5(10):845-854
pubmed: 30170964
Br J Psychiatry. 2015 Apr;206(4):263-5
pubmed: 25833865
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Summer;2(2):161-70
pubmed: 20208250
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Dec 05;5:40
pubmed: 31844555
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e53244
pubmed: 23285271
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jun;25(6):435-446
pubmed: 30048211