Usefulness of a multibending endoscope in gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection.

ESD, endoscopic submucosal dissection

Journal

VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
ISSN: 2468-4481
Titre abrégé: VideoGIE
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101719677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Historique:
entrez: 18 12 2019
pubmed: 18 12 2019
medline: 18 12 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Intraoperative perforation is a major adverse event of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). To avoid perforation, it is important for the endoscope to approach the portion to be resected carefully and to ensure that the knife can approach the submucosa at an angle parallel to the muscle layer. The multibending endoscope has 2 bends at its tip and may facilitate the ESD procedure. To the best of our knowledge, very few studies have reported the use of the multibending endoscope during gastric ESD. The aim of this study was, therefore, to introduce the usefulness of the multibending endoscope for gastric ESD. We report 2 cases of early gastric cancer in which ESD was performed using a multibending endoscope. Unlike conventional single-bending endoscopes that have only 1 moveable part, the multibending endoscope allowed difficult areas to be approached more easily. Small adjustments could be made to the upward or downward angle of both the first and the second bending sections of the endoscope. This ensured that the knife would approach the submucosa at an angle parallel to the muscle layer. In patient 1, initially the conventional endoscope was used, but it became more difficult to approach the site, and paradoxic movement occurred. When the conventional endoscope was changed to the multibending endoscope, the ESD procedure became safer and more efficient. Another ESD using the multibending endoscope was performed successfully without any adverse events. The use of a multibending endoscope for ESD will enable safer and faster treatment of patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OBJECTIVE
Intraoperative perforation is a major adverse event of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). To avoid perforation, it is important for the endoscope to approach the portion to be resected carefully and to ensure that the knife can approach the submucosa at an angle parallel to the muscle layer. The multibending endoscope has 2 bends at its tip and may facilitate the ESD procedure. To the best of our knowledge, very few studies have reported the use of the multibending endoscope during gastric ESD. The aim of this study was, therefore, to introduce the usefulness of the multibending endoscope for gastric ESD.
METHODS METHODS
We report 2 cases of early gastric cancer in which ESD was performed using a multibending endoscope.
RESULTS RESULTS
Unlike conventional single-bending endoscopes that have only 1 moveable part, the multibending endoscope allowed difficult areas to be approached more easily. Small adjustments could be made to the upward or downward angle of both the first and the second bending sections of the endoscope. This ensured that the knife would approach the submucosa at an angle parallel to the muscle layer. In patient 1, initially the conventional endoscope was used, but it became more difficult to approach the site, and paradoxic movement occurred. When the conventional endoscope was changed to the multibending endoscope, the ESD procedure became safer and more efficient. Another ESD using the multibending endoscope was performed successfully without any adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The use of a multibending endoscope for ESD will enable safer and faster treatment of patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31844823
doi: 10.1016/j.vgie.2019.08.012
pii: S2468-4481(19)30229-2
pmc: PMC6895728
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

577-583

Informations de copyright

© 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Références

Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2017;2017:7404613
pubmed: 28894466
Clin Endosc. 2015 Jan;48(1):85-6
pubmed: 25674534
Dig Endosc. 2019 Apr;31 Suppl 1:4-20
pubmed: 30994225
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Aug;74(2):415-8
pubmed: 21663906
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1372-8
pubmed: 23239296
Endoscopy. 2006 Oct;38(10):987-90
pubmed: 17058162
Endoscopy. 2004 Apr;36(4):294-7
pubmed: 15057677

Auteurs

Koichi Hamada (K)

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima.
Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama.

Yoshinori Horikawa (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama.

Ryota Koyanagi (R)

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima.
Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama.

Yoshiki Shiwa (Y)

Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama.

Kae Techigawara (K)

Department of Gastroenterology, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama.

Shinya Nishida (S)

Department of Gastroenterology, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki.

Yujiro Nakayama (Y)

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima.
Department of Surgery, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan.

Michitaka Honda (M)

Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima.
Department of Surgery, Southern-Tohoku General Hospital, Koriyama, Japan.

Classifications MeSH