Effect of Rocuronium vs Succinylcholine on Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate Among Patients Undergoing Out-of-Hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Journal
JAMA
ISSN: 1538-3598
Titre abrégé: JAMA
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7501160
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 12 2019
17 12 2019
Historique:
entrez:
18
12
2019
pubmed:
18
12
2019
medline:
1
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rocuronium and succinylcholine are often used for rapid sequence intubation, although the comparative efficacy of these paralytic agents for achieving successful intubation in an emergency setting has not been evaluated in clinical trials. Succinylcholine use has been associated with several adverse events not reported with rocuronium. To assess the noninferiority of rocuronium vs succinylcholine for tracheal intubation in out-of-hospital emergency situations. Multicenter, single-blind, noninferiority randomized clinical trial comparing rocuronium (1.2 mg/kg) with succinylcholine (1 mg/kg) for rapid sequence intubation in 1248 adult patients needing out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. Enrollment occurred from January 2014 to August 2016 in 17 French out-of-hospital emergency medical units. The date of final follow-up was August 31, 2016. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo tracheal intubation facilitated by rocuronium (n = 624) or succinylcholine (n = 624). The primary outcome was the intubation success rate on first attempt. A noninferiority margin of 7% was chosen. A per-protocol analysis was prespecified as the primary analysis. Among 1248 patients who were randomized (mean age, 56 years; 501 [40.1%] women), 1230 (98.6%) completed the trial and 1226 (98.2%) were included in the per-protocol analysis. The number of patients with successful first-attempt intubation was 455 of 610 (74.6%) in the rocuronium group vs 489 of 616 (79.4%) in the succinylcholine group, with a between-group difference of -4.8% (1-sided 97.5% CI, -9% to ∞), which did not meet criteria for noninferiority. The most common intubation-related adverse events were hypoxemia (55 of 610 patients [9.0%]) and hypotension (39 of 610 patients [6.4%]) in the rocuronium group and hypoxemia (61 of 616 [9.9%]) and hypotension (62 of 616 patients [10.1%]) in the succinylcholine group. Among patients undergoing endotracheal intubation in an out-of-hospital emergency setting, rocuronium, compared with succinylcholine, failed to demonstrate noninferiority with regard to first-attempt intubation success rate. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02000674.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31846014
pii: 2757578
doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18254
pmc: PMC6990819
doi:
Substances chimiques
Succinylcholine
J2R869A8YF
Rocuronium
WRE554RFEZ
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02000674']
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Equivalence Trial
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2303-2312Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Références
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2008 Jan;27(1):41-5
pubmed: 18164580
Anaesthesia. 2010 Apr;65(4):358-61
pubmed: 20402874
Int J Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;10(1):1
pubmed: 28124199
US Army Med Dep J. 2017 Oct-Dec;(3-17):98-104
pubmed: 29214627
Crit Care. 2011 Aug 16;15(4):R199
pubmed: 21846380
J Emerg Med. 1999 Jul-Aug;17(4):611-6
pubmed: 10431949
JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604
pubmed: 23268518
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Apr;13(4):372-7
pubmed: 16531595
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Jan;20(1):71-8
pubmed: 23574475
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;60(6):749-754.e2
pubmed: 22542734
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Aug;13(8):828-34
pubmed: 16807397
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;(10):CD002788
pubmed: 26512948
Anesthesiology. 1993 Nov;79(5):913-8
pubmed: 7902034
Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;25(5):529-34
pubmed: 17543656
BMJ. 1996 Jul 6;313(7048):36-9
pubmed: 8664772
Resuscitation. 2011 May;82(5):517-22
pubmed: 21345571
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;72(6):645-653
pubmed: 29747958
Emerg Med J. 2012 Mar;29(3):256-8
pubmed: 22337834
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Jan;18(1):10-4
pubmed: 21182564
Eur J Emerg Med. 1998 Dec;5(4):415-9
pubmed: 9919445
J Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;49(1):43-9
pubmed: 25797938
Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents
pubmed: 15271750
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 May;19(5):361-7
pubmed: 12095017
Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11
pubmed: 6507827
Anaesthesia. 2017 Jun;72(6):765-777
pubmed: 28654173
Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Nov;18(7):757-63
pubmed: 11103724
Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1290-7
pubmed: 9416711
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 Apr;31(4):313-21
pubmed: 22440814
Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):151-5
pubmed: 16368821
J Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;37(2):183-8
pubmed: 19097730
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352
pubmed: 29406182
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Sep;50(3):258-63
pubmed: 17583382
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Jan-Mar;10(1):8-13
pubmed: 16418085
Br J Anaesth. 2012 Apr;108(4):682-9
pubmed: 22315329
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2011 Feb;55(2):203-8
pubmed: 21226862
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Mar;57(3):225-31
pubmed: 21129822
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996 Jan;40(1):59-74
pubmed: 8904261
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD002788
pubmed: 18425883