On How Definitions of Habits Can Complicate Habit Research.
automaticity
conceptual analysis
goal-directed behavior
habits
learning
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
14
02
2019
accepted:
08
11
2019
entrez:
19
12
2019
pubmed:
19
12
2019
medline:
19
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The core message of this paper is that many of the challenges of habit research can be traced back to the presence of causal elements within the definition of habits. For instance, the idea that habits are stimulus-driven implies that habitual behavior is not causally mediated by goal-representations. The presence of these causal elements in the definition of habits leads to difficulties in establishing empirically whether behavior is habitual. Some of these elements can also impoverish theoretical thinking about the mechanisms underlying habitual behavior. I argue that habit research would benefit from eliminating any reference to specific S-R association formation theories from the definition of habits. Which causal elements are retained in the definition of habits depends on the goals of researchers. However, regardless of the definition that is selected, it is good to be aware of the implications of the definition of habits for empirical and theoretical research on habits.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31849762
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02642
pmc: PMC6895142
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
2642Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 De Houwer.
Références
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Oct;146(10):1513-1525
pubmed: 28703618
Behav Brain Sci. 2014 Apr;37(2):121-35
pubmed: 24775120
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Jan;149(1):160-181
pubmed: 31246061
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Nov;37(11):1428-37
pubmed: 21859902
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:263-87
pubmed: 26331343
Health Psychol Rev. 2015;9(3):277-95
pubmed: 25207647
Addict Behav Rep. 2017 Jan 24;5:67-84
pubmed: 29450229
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Sep;68:862-879
pubmed: 27375276
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Jun;36(3):181-204
pubmed: 23663408
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):1-11
pubmed: 17227190
Exp Psychol. 2019 Jul;66(4):257-265
pubmed: 31530250
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Jan;78(1):53-63
pubmed: 10653505
Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;132(2):297-326
pubmed: 16536645
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Oct;42(2):174-87
pubmed: 21626256
Int J Psychol. 2016 Feb;51(1):4-14
pubmed: 26616481
Psychol Rev. 2007 Oct;114(4):843-63
pubmed: 17907866
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):127-38
pubmed: 20068583
Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2018 May;12(5):
pubmed: 34079587
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019 Aug;23(3):267-284
pubmed: 30229697
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):69-80
pubmed: 25706547
Am Psychol. 1992 Nov;47(11):1287-99
pubmed: 1482000
Nat Neurosci. 2018 Aug;21(8):1019-1021
pubmed: 30038278
Am Psychol. 2007 Oct;62(7):671-81
pubmed: 17924750
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jun 26;8:457
pubmed: 25018724
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;6(2):202-9
pubmed: 26162139
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Jul;147(7):1043-1065
pubmed: 29975092
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:289-314
pubmed: 26361052