Syncope in the Emergency Department.
emergency department (ED)
initial evaluation
outcomes
risk stratification
syncope
Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
10
09
2019
accepted:
18
11
2019
entrez:
19
12
2019
pubmed:
19
12
2019
medline:
19
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Syncope is a common presentation to Emergency Departments (EDs). Estimates on the frequency of visits (0.6-1.7%) and subsequent rates of hospitalizations (12-85%) vary according to country. The initial ED evaluation for syncope consists of a detailed history, physical examination and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). The use of additional diagnostic testing and specialist evaluation should be based on this initial evaluation rather than an unstructured approach of broad-based testing. Risk stratification performed in the ED is important for estimating prognosis, triage decisions and to establish urgency of any further work-up. The primary approach to risk stratification focuses on identifying high- and low-risk predictors. The use of prediction tools may be used to aid in physician decision-making; however, they have not performed better than the clinical judgment of emergency room physicians. Following risk stratification, decision for hospitalization should be based on the seriousness of the underlying cause for syncope or based on high-risk features, or the severity of co-morbidities. For those deemed intermediate risk, access to specialist assessment and related testing may occur in a syncope unit in the emergency department, as an outpatient, or in a less formal care pathway and is highly dependent on the local healthcare system. For syncope patients presenting to the ED, ~0.8% die and 10.3% suffer a non-fatal severe outcome within 30 days.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31850375
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00180
pmc: PMC6901601
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
180Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Sandhu and Sheldon.
Références
Can J Cardiol. 2017 Apr;33(4):456-462
pubmed: 28129966
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 May;47(5):448-54
pubmed: 16631985
Heart. 2008 Dec;94(12):1620-6
pubmed: 18519550
Europace. 2015 Sep;17(9):1325-40
pubmed: 26108809
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):998-1001
pubmed: 25943042
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):276-83
pubmed: 18206736
Circulation. 2004 Dec 14;110(24):3636-45
pubmed: 15536093
Europace. 2016 Mar;18(3):457-62
pubmed: 25976905
Circulation. 2019 Feb 25;:null
pubmed: 30798615
CMAJ. 2016 Sep 6;188(12):E289-E298
pubmed: 27378464
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Aug;52(2):151-9
pubmed: 18282636
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jun 1;39(21):1883-1948
pubmed: 29562304
Europace. 2003 Jul;5(3):283-91
pubmed: 12842645
Europace. 2015 Feb;17(2):300-8
pubmed: 25476868
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Mar;27(3):271-9
pubmed: 19328369
Circulation. 2017 Aug 1;136(5):e25-e59
pubmed: 28280232
Eur Heart J. 2002 May;23(10):815-20
pubmed: 12009722
Eur Heart J. 2009 Nov;30(21):2631-71
pubmed: 19713422
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;64(2):167-75
pubmed: 24239341
Am J Med. 2001 Aug 15;111(3):177-84
pubmed: 11530027
J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):321-8
pubmed: 23218198
Eur Heart J. 2003 May;24(9):811-9
pubmed: 12727148
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Feb;4(2):265-273
pubmed: 29749948
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(1):76-82
pubmed: 16272210
Am J Med. 2014 Nov;127(11):1126.e13-25
pubmed: 24862309
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Apr;29(4):459-66
pubmed: 9095005
Eur Heart J. 2000 Jun;21(11):935-40
pubmed: 10806018
Europace. 2011 Nov;13(11):1632-8
pubmed: 21757485
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Feb 23;55(8):713-21
pubmed: 20170806
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;64(6):649-55.e2
pubmed: 24882667