Prolonged quiescence delays somatic stem cell-like divisions in Caenorhabditis elegans and is controlled by insulin signaling.
Adult Stem Cells
/ metabolism
Aging
/ genetics
Animals
Caenorhabditis elegans
/ genetics
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins
/ genetics
Cell Division
Cell Proliferation
Food Deprivation
Forkhead Transcription Factors
/ genetics
Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
/ genetics
Insulin
/ metabolism
Larva
/ growth & development
Mutation
Signal Transduction
/ genetics
Time Factors
C. elegans
arrest
development
insulin signaling
proliferation
quiescence
Journal
Aging cell
ISSN: 1474-9726
Titre abrégé: Aging Cell
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101130839
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
28
08
2019
revised:
30
10
2019
accepted:
13
11
2019
pubmed:
19
12
2019
medline:
21
11
2020
entrez:
19
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cells can enter quiescence in adverse conditions and resume proliferation when the environment becomes favorable. Prolonged quiescence comes with a cost, reducing the subsequent speed and potential to return to proliferation. Here, we show that a similar process happens during Caenorhabditis elegans development, providing an in vivo model to study proliferative capacity after quiescence. Hatching under starvation provokes the arrest of blast cell divisions that normally take place during the first larval stage (L1). We have used a novel method to precisely quantify each stage of postembryonic development to analyze the consequences of prolonged L1 quiescence. We report that prolonged L1 quiescence delays the reactivation of blast cell divisions in C. elegans, leading to a delay in the initiation of postembryonic development. The transcription factor DAF-16/FOXO is necessary for rapid recovery after extended arrest, and this effect is independent from its role as a suppressor of cell proliferation. Instead, the activation of DAF-16 by decreased insulin signaling reduces the rate of L1 aging, increasing proliferative potential. We also show that yolk provisioning affects the proliferative potential after L1 arrest modulating the rate of L1 aging, providing a possible mechanistic link between insulin signaling and the maintenance of proliferative potential. Furthermore, variable yolk provisioning in embryos is one of the sources of interindividual variability in recovery after quiescence of genetically identical animals. Our results support the relevance of L1 arrest as an in vivo model to study stem cell-like aging and the mechanisms for maintenance of proliferation potential after quiescence.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31852031
doi: 10.1111/acel.13085
pmc: PMC6996950
doi:
Substances chimiques
Caenorhabditis elegans Proteins
0
Forkhead Transcription Factors
0
Insulin
0
daf-16 protein, C elegans
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e13085Subventions
Organisme : Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
ID : RYC-2010-06167
Pays : International
Organisme : FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
ID : PEOPLE-2013-IEF-627263
Pays : International
Organisme : Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
ID : BFU2016-74949-P
Pays : International
Organisme : Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
ID : RYC-2014-15551
Pays : International
Organisme : FP7 Ideas: European Research Council
ID : ERC-2011-StG-281691
Pays : International
Organisme : Secretaría de Estado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación
ID : BFU2012-35509
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. Aging Cell published by the Anatomical Society and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):171-80
pubmed: 12586705
Nature. 1997 Oct 30;389(6654):994-9
pubmed: 9353126
Nat Genet. 2001 Jun;28(2):139-45
pubmed: 11381260
Nature. 2017 Dec 7;552(7683):106-109
pubmed: 29186117
Development. 1998 Sep;125(18):3585-97
pubmed: 9716524
Curr Biol. 2001 Dec 11;11(24):1975-80
pubmed: 11747825
J Biol Chem. 2004 Sep 10;279(37):39155-64
pubmed: 15234983
Genetics. 2015 Oct;201(2):443-8
pubmed: 26294666
Cell Metab. 2016 Jun 14;23(6):1113-1126
pubmed: 27304510
Curr Biol. 2006 Apr 18;16(8):780-5
pubmed: 16631585
J Cell Comp Physiol. 1963 Dec;62:327-36
pubmed: 14086156
Dev Biol. 1977 Mar;56(1):110-56
pubmed: 838129
Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):504-12
pubmed: 20336132
Sci Rep. 2015 Nov 10;5:16381
pubmed: 26553710
Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 12;2(2):e1501244
pubmed: 26933687
PLoS Genet. 2015 Dec 11;11(12):e1005731
pubmed: 26656736
Curr Biol. 2019 Jul 22;29(14):2380-2388.e5
pubmed: 31280992
PLoS Genet. 2016 Oct 26;12(10):e1006396
pubmed: 27783623
Cell. 2011 Mar 4;144(5):646-74
pubmed: 21376230
Nat Med. 2014 Aug;20(8):870-80
pubmed: 25100532
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 5;116(45):22624-22634
pubmed: 31636214
Genetics. 2011 Jan;187(1):337-43
pubmed: 20944013
World J Exp Med. 2017 Feb 20;7(1):1-10
pubmed: 28261550
Cell. 2007 Jan 26;128(2):325-39
pubmed: 17254970
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44720
pubmed: 22970296
J Cell Biol. 2006 Apr 24;173(2):231-9
pubmed: 16636145
Development. 2010 Feb;137(4):671-80
pubmed: 20110332
Curr Biol. 2018 Nov 19;28(22):3610-3624.e8
pubmed: 30416057
Cell Rep. 2017 Sep 26;20(13):3223-3235
pubmed: 28954237
Genetics. 2015 Sep;201(1):201-12
pubmed: 26187123
Genes Dev. 2008 Aug 1;22(15):2102-10
pubmed: 18676815
Science. 1997 Nov 14;278(5341):1319-22
pubmed: 9360933
Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71-94
pubmed: 4366476
Genetics. 2017 Sep;207(1):83-101
pubmed: 28696216
Curr Biol. 2015 May 4;25(9):1241-8
pubmed: 25891400
Genetics. 2013 Jul;194(3):539-55
pubmed: 23824969
PLoS One. 2010 Dec 28;5(12):e15662
pubmed: 21203392
Nat Med. 2005 Oct;11(10):1026-8
pubmed: 16211027
Proteomes. 2018 Nov 12;6(4):
pubmed: 30424485
Science. 2010 Jan 29;327(5965):542-5
pubmed: 20110496
BMC Biol. 2006 Feb 03;4:1
pubmed: 16457721
Aging Cell. 2020 Feb;19(2):e13085
pubmed: 31852031
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 22;8(1):321
pubmed: 28831039
Mol Biol Cell. 1999 Dec;10(12):4311-26
pubmed: 10588660