Evaluation of Barrett universal II formula for intraocular lens power calculation in Asian Indian population.
Barrett
IOL formula
prediction error
refraction
Journal
Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
entrez:
21
12
2019
pubmed:
21
12
2019
medline:
18
11
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Barrett Universal II (BU-II) is considered as one of the most accurate intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation formulas; however, there is no literature studying the same in Indian population. evaluate the accuracy of BU-II formula in prediction of IOL power for cataract surgery in Asian Indian population. prospective, observational study. Patients with senile cataract who underwent phacoemulsification with posterior chamber IOL implantation were enrolled in the study. Biometry data from Lenstar-LS900 was used and IOL power was calculated using four IOL formulas: modified SRK-II, SRK/T, Olsen, and BU-II. Primary outcome was measured as the prediction error in postoperative refraction for each formula and secondary outcome was measured as the difference in mean absolute errors between the four formulas. SPSS Version-21 with P < 0.05 considered significant. A total of 244 eyes were included in the study and were divided into three groups in accordance to axial length (AL): Group 1 (AL: 22-24.5 mm; N = 135), Group 2 (AL <22 mm; N = 53), and Group 3 (AL >24.5 mm; N = 56). BU-II formula gave the lowest mean absolute error (0.37 ± 0.27D) and median absolute error (0.34) in predicted postoperative refraction in the entire study population. When compared with the other formulas, mean absolute error was significantly lower in all three groups (P < 0.0005) as well, except for Olsen formula in the normal AL group, where the results were comparable (P = 0.742). BU-II performed as the most accurate formula in the prediction of postoperative refraction over a wide range of ALs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31856468
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2020_68_1_59_273258
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_600_19
pmc: PMC6951124
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
59-64Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None
Références
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jan;37(1):50-62
pubmed: 21183099
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Aug;42(8):1157-64
pubmed: 27531292
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):548-56
pubmed: 25708208
Ophthalmology. 2018 Feb;125(2):169-178
pubmed: 28951074
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Nov;19(6):713-20
pubmed: 8271166
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Oct;42(10):1490-1500
pubmed: 27839605
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;46(3):240-246
pubmed: 28778114
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;160(5):1085-6
pubmed: 26349424
Am J Ophthalmol. 2015 Sep;160(3):403-405.e1
pubmed: 26117311
Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Oct;73(10):823-6
pubmed: 2818992
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 May-Jun;43(4):328-34
pubmed: 25491591
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1987 Jul;13(4):389-96
pubmed: 3625516
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 May;16(3):333-40
pubmed: 2355321
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1995 May;21(3):313-9
pubmed: 7674170