Identifying relevant concepts and factors for the sustainability of evidence-based practices within acute care contexts: a systematic review and theory analysis of selected sustainability frameworks.
Evidence-based practices/guidelines/programs/interventions
Frameworks
Innovations
Institutionalization
Models
Routinization
Sustainment
Theories; Sustainability
Utilization
Journal
Implementation science : IS
ISSN: 1748-5908
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101258411
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 12 2019
19 12 2019
Historique:
received:
18
05
2019
accepted:
31
10
2019
entrez:
21
12
2019
pubmed:
21
12
2019
medline:
26
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is growing recognition among healthcare professionals that the sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) within different settings is variable and suboptimal. Understanding why a particular EBP might be sustained in one setting and not another remains unclear. Recent reviews illustrate the need to identify and analyze existing frameworks/models/theories (F/M/Ts) that focus solely on the sustainability of EBPs in specific healthcare settings, such as acute care, to illuminate key determinants and facilitate appropriate selection to guide practice and research. We conducted a systematic review to extract sustainability frameworks. This involved using two available syntheses of the literature and a systematic search of four databases from January 2015 to July 2018: CINHAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ProQuest. We included studies published in English, and if they included sustainability F/M/Ts recommended for use in acute care or an unspecified healthcare organization/setting. F/M/Ts explicitly recommended for use in public health and or community settings were excluded. We then conducted a comparative analysis of F/M/Ts using a modified theory analysis approach, to understand the theoretical underpinnings of each F/M/T, their determinants and concepts hypothesized to influence the sustained use of EBPs within an acute care context. Of 2967 identified citations from the 2 available syntheses and the systematic review, 8 F/M/Ts met the inclusion criteria. We identified 37 core factors, of which 16 were recorded as common factors (occurring within 4 or more of the 8 included F/M/Ts). All factors grouped into 7 main themes: innovation, adopters, leadership and management, inner context, inner processes, outer context, and outcomes. This systematic review is the first to include a comprehensive analysis of healthcare sustainability F/M/Ts for the sustained use of EBPs in acute care settings. Findings reveal insights into sustainability as a "process or ongoing stage of use" following initial implementation, suggesting this construct should be added to the definition of sustainability. Results provide a resource of available F/M/Ts and hypothesized factors to consider for acute care team members who are planning or currently implementing EBPs with the goal of improving patient outcomes. It also provides a basis for future research on sustainability in acute care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
There is growing recognition among healthcare professionals that the sustainability of evidence-based practices (EBPs) within different settings is variable and suboptimal. Understanding why a particular EBP might be sustained in one setting and not another remains unclear. Recent reviews illustrate the need to identify and analyze existing frameworks/models/theories (F/M/Ts) that focus solely on the sustainability of EBPs in specific healthcare settings, such as acute care, to illuminate key determinants and facilitate appropriate selection to guide practice and research.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review to extract sustainability frameworks. This involved using two available syntheses of the literature and a systematic search of four databases from January 2015 to July 2018: CINHAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and ProQuest. We included studies published in English, and if they included sustainability F/M/Ts recommended for use in acute care or an unspecified healthcare organization/setting. F/M/Ts explicitly recommended for use in public health and or community settings were excluded. We then conducted a comparative analysis of F/M/Ts using a modified theory analysis approach, to understand the theoretical underpinnings of each F/M/T, their determinants and concepts hypothesized to influence the sustained use of EBPs within an acute care context.
RESULTS
Of 2967 identified citations from the 2 available syntheses and the systematic review, 8 F/M/Ts met the inclusion criteria. We identified 37 core factors, of which 16 were recorded as common factors (occurring within 4 or more of the 8 included F/M/Ts). All factors grouped into 7 main themes: innovation, adopters, leadership and management, inner context, inner processes, outer context, and outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS
This systematic review is the first to include a comprehensive analysis of healthcare sustainability F/M/Ts for the sustained use of EBPs in acute care settings. Findings reveal insights into sustainability as a "process or ongoing stage of use" following initial implementation, suggesting this construct should be added to the definition of sustainability. Results provide a resource of available F/M/Ts and hypothesized factors to consider for acute care team members who are planning or currently implementing EBPs with the goal of improving patient outcomes. It also provides a basis for future research on sustainability in acute care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31856861
doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0952-9
pii: 10.1186/s13012-019-0952-9
pmc: PMC6923954
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
108Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : FDN#143237
Pays : Canada
Références
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 09;13(1):27
pubmed: 29426341
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53
pubmed: 25895742
BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647
pubmed: 25555855
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;75:40-6
pubmed: 27005575
J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Feb;58(2):107-12
pubmed: 15680740
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 02;8:117
pubmed: 24088228
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 2;12(1):110
pubmed: 28865479
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jul;71(7):1484-98
pubmed: 25708256
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2014 Jun;11(3):156-67
pubmed: 24934565
J Health Organ Manag. 2017 Mar 20;31(1):64-81
pubmed: 28260412
J Clin Nurs. 2011 May;20(9-10):1329-38
pubmed: 21492279
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 26;8:127
pubmed: 24160758
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 13;8:18
pubmed: 23406398
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Nov;70(11):2469-82
pubmed: 25113388
Health Educ Res. 1998 Mar;13(1):87-108
pubmed: 10178339
J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15
pubmed: 18352969
Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 14;7:17
pubmed: 22417162
Int J Qual Health Care. 2013 Apr;25(2):125-31
pubmed: 23422040
Implement Sci. 2011 Mar 09;6:18
pubmed: 21385467
Am J Public Health. 2011 Nov;101(11):2059-67
pubmed: 21940916
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Nov 14;18(1):857
pubmed: 30428882
Implement Sci. 2015 Jul 14;10:98
pubmed: 26169063
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Jun;22(11-12):1707-16
pubmed: 22946696
Implement Sci. 2011 Jan 05;6:1
pubmed: 21208425
Qual Manag Health Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;20(4):263-79
pubmed: 21971024
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 29;5(12):e008073
pubmed: 26715477
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Jan;36(1):24-34
pubmed: 19104929
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 23;13(1):36
pubmed: 29475440
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Feb;29(1):61-70
pubmed: 16404735
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Sep;56:29-34
pubmed: 28651100
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 5;8(9):e025069
pubmed: 30185584
Aust Health Rev. 2015 Feb;39(1):70-75
pubmed: 25513878
Lancet. 2008 Nov 1;372(9649):1579-89
pubmed: 18984192
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Feb;21 Suppl 2:S43-9
pubmed: 16637960
Implement Sci. 2016 Apr 21;11:55
pubmed: 27097827
Int J Inf Syst Change Manag. 2011;5(1):22-35
pubmed: 22262947
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:55-76
pubmed: 29328872
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Nov 16;11:314
pubmed: 22087884
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2006 May;33(3):356-87
pubmed: 16755396
Implement Sci. 2015 Jun 11;10:88
pubmed: 26062907
Can J Nurs Res. 2004 Jun;36(2):89-103
pubmed: 15369167
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;62(10):1006-12
pubmed: 19631508
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):936-41
pubmed: 17967955
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jul;102(7):1274-81
pubmed: 22594758