Reproductive stoppage in autism spectrum disorder in a population of 2.5 million individuals.
Autism
Autism spectrum disorder
Fecundity
Reproduction
Reproductive stoppage
Journal
Molecular autism
ISSN: 2040-2392
Titre abrégé: Mol Autism
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101534222
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
15
05
2018
accepted:
25
11
2019
entrez:
21
12
2019
pubmed:
21
12
2019
medline:
18
6
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It has been suggested that parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) curtail their reproduction, a phenomenon known as reproductive stoppage. To investigate the presence of reproductive stoppage, we followed the reproduction in mothers of children with or without an ASD diagnosis using Swedish population-based registries. We followed all families with first child born in 1987 or later. In total 2,521,103 children, nested within 1,270,017 mothers, were included. Exposure was presence of ASD diagnosis in earlier born siblings, and outcome was considered as (1) inter-pregnancy interval and (2) number of subsequent children. Analyses of inter-pregnancy intervals showed that the association differed across birth orders, with a lower rate of second children when first child had ASD diagnosis, but an increased rate of third and higher birth orders in families where a previous child had an ASD diagnosis. When all birth orders were simultaneously considered, families with a child with an ASD diagnosis were less likely to have another child (hazard ratio (HR), 0.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.78-0.80). However, when adjusted for birth order, the association was close to null (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and after additional adjustments (maternal age, birth period, sex, paternal age, and maternal education), the association disappeared (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02). In analyses of subsequent children, after adjustment for covariates, families with an ASD diagnosis had 4% more subsequent children (rate ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05). The study was undertaken in a country with largely tax-funded healthcare; results may not generalize to other societies. Following the current dominating umbrella concept of ASD, we did not differentiate between the ASD sub-diagnoses; it is possible that reproductive patterns can be dependent on ASD subtypes and the severity and composition of ASD phenotypes and comorbidities. This study does not support a universal reproductive stoppage effect in ASD families, when birth order and other factors are considered. Therefore, proper attention to birth order and other factors may alleviate potential bias in familial aggregation studies of ASD.
Sections du résumé
Background
It has been suggested that parents of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) curtail their reproduction, a phenomenon known as reproductive stoppage. To investigate the presence of reproductive stoppage, we followed the reproduction in mothers of children with or without an ASD diagnosis using Swedish population-based registries.
Methods
We followed all families with first child born in 1987 or later. In total 2,521,103 children, nested within 1,270,017 mothers, were included. Exposure was presence of ASD diagnosis in earlier born siblings, and outcome was considered as (1) inter-pregnancy interval and (2) number of subsequent children.
Results
Analyses of inter-pregnancy intervals showed that the association differed across birth orders, with a lower rate of second children when first child had ASD diagnosis, but an increased rate of third and higher birth orders in families where a previous child had an ASD diagnosis. When all birth orders were simultaneously considered, families with a child with an ASD diagnosis were less likely to have another child (hazard ratio (HR), 0.79; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.78-0.80). However, when adjusted for birth order, the association was close to null (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.96-0.99), and after additional adjustments (maternal age, birth period, sex, paternal age, and maternal education), the association disappeared (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02). In analyses of subsequent children, after adjustment for covariates, families with an ASD diagnosis had 4% more subsequent children (rate ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03-1.05).
Limitations
The study was undertaken in a country with largely tax-funded healthcare; results may not generalize to other societies. Following the current dominating umbrella concept of ASD, we did not differentiate between the ASD sub-diagnoses; it is possible that reproductive patterns can be dependent on ASD subtypes and the severity and composition of ASD phenotypes and comorbidities.
Conclusions
This study does not support a universal reproductive stoppage effect in ASD families, when birth order and other factors are considered. Therefore, proper attention to birth order and other factors may alleviate potential bias in familial aggregation studies of ASD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31857873
doi: 10.1186/s13229-019-0300-6
pii: 300
pmc: PMC6907273
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
45Informations de copyright
© The Author(s). 2019.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interestsHL has served as a speaker for Evolan and Shire and has received a research grant from Shire, all outside the submitted work. SB has in the last 5 years acted as an author, consultant, or lecturer for Shire, Medice, Roche, Eli Lilly, Prima Psychiatry, GLGroup, System Analytic, Kompetento, Expo Medica, and Prophase. He receives royalties for text books and diagnostic tools from Huber/Hogrefe, Kohlhammer and UTB, all outside the submitted work. PL has served as a speaker for Medicine, all outside of submitted work. No other disclosures are reported.
Références
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;675:215-20
pubmed: 20949391
Genet Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;20(3):328-39
pubmed: 11255242
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1990 Jan;31(1):39-83
pubmed: 2179248
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Nov;45(11):3509-19
pubmed: 26077953
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;34(4):423-437
pubmed: 30929112
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Jun;45(6):1766-73
pubmed: 25475364
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;35(5):877-900
pubmed: 7962246
J Autism Dev Disord. 1988 Mar;18(1):31-40
pubmed: 3372457
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:235-58
pubmed: 17367287
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;31(2):125-36
pubmed: 26769609
Autism Res. 2015 Feb;8(1):73-81
pubmed: 25273900
JAMA Psychiatry. 2014 Aug;71(8):943-51
pubmed: 24942798
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450
pubmed: 21658213
Nat Rev Genet. 2001 Dec;2(12):943-55
pubmed: 11733747
Mol Psychiatry. 2016 May;21(5):693-700
pubmed: 26055426