Biplanar X-Ray Methods for Stereotactic Intraoperative Localization in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.


Journal

Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 2332-4260
Titre abrégé: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635417

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2020
Historique:
received: 23 07 2019
accepted: 28 10 2019
pubmed: 21 12 2019
medline: 22 6 2021
entrez: 21 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Efficacy in deep brain stimulation (DBS) is dependent on precise positioning of electrodes within the brain. Intraoperative fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging are used for stereotactic intraoperative localization (StIL), but the utility of biplanar X-ray has not been evaluated in detail. To determine if analysis of orthogonal biplanar X-rays using graphical analysis (GA), ray tracing (RT), and/or perspective projection (PP) can be utilized for StIL. A review of electrode tip positions comparing postoperative CT to X-ray methods was performed for DBS operations containing orthogonal biplanar X-ray with referential spheres and pins. Euclidean (Re) errors for final DBS electrode position on intraoperative X-rays vs postoperative CT using GA, RT, and PP methods averaged 1.58 mm (±0.75), 0.74 mm (±0.45), and 1.07 mm (±0.64), respectively (n = 56). GA was more accurate with a ventriculogram. RT and PP predicted positions that correlated with third ventricular structures on ventriculogram cases. RT was the most stable but required knowledge of the geometric setup. PP was more flexible than RT but required well-distributed reference points. A single case using the O-arm demonstrated Re errors of 0.43 mm and 0.28 mm for RT and PP, respectively. In addition, these techniques could also be used to calculate directional electrode rotation. GA, RT, and PP can be employed for precise StIL during DBS using orthogonal biplanar X-ray. These methods may be generalized to other stereotactic procedures or instances of biplanar imaging such as angiograms, radiosurgery, or injection therapeutics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Efficacy in deep brain stimulation (DBS) is dependent on precise positioning of electrodes within the brain. Intraoperative fluoroscopy, computed tomography (CT), or magnetic resonance imaging are used for stereotactic intraoperative localization (StIL), but the utility of biplanar X-ray has not been evaluated in detail.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if analysis of orthogonal biplanar X-rays using graphical analysis (GA), ray tracing (RT), and/or perspective projection (PP) can be utilized for StIL.
METHODS
A review of electrode tip positions comparing postoperative CT to X-ray methods was performed for DBS operations containing orthogonal biplanar X-ray with referential spheres and pins.
RESULTS
Euclidean (Re) errors for final DBS electrode position on intraoperative X-rays vs postoperative CT using GA, RT, and PP methods averaged 1.58 mm (±0.75), 0.74 mm (±0.45), and 1.07 mm (±0.64), respectively (n = 56). GA was more accurate with a ventriculogram. RT and PP predicted positions that correlated with third ventricular structures on ventriculogram cases. RT was the most stable but required knowledge of the geometric setup. PP was more flexible than RT but required well-distributed reference points. A single case using the O-arm demonstrated Re errors of 0.43 mm and 0.28 mm for RT and PP, respectively. In addition, these techniques could also be used to calculate directional electrode rotation.
CONCLUSION
GA, RT, and PP can be employed for precise StIL during DBS using orthogonal biplanar X-ray. These methods may be generalized to other stereotactic procedures or instances of biplanar imaging such as angiograms, radiosurgery, or injection therapeutics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31858143
pii: 5681720
doi: 10.1093/ons/opz397
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

302-312

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 by theCongress of Neurological Surgeons.

Auteurs

Mark Sedrak (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.
Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Eric Sabelman (E)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

Patrick Pezeshkian (P)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

John Duncan (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

Ivan Bernstein (I)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

Diana Bruce (D)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

Victor Tse (V)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

Suketu Khandhar (S)

Kaiser Permanente Sacramento Medical Center and Medical Offices, Sacramento, California.

Elena Call (E)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

Gary Heit (G)

Department of Neurosurgery, Kaiser Permanente, Redwood City, California.

Armando Alaminos-Bouza (A)

Mevis Informática Médica, São Paulo, Brazil.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH