To what extent do patients' racial characteristics affect our clinical decisions?


Journal

Evidence-based dentistry
ISSN: 1476-5446
Titre abrégé: Evid Based Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100883603

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2019
Historique:
entrez: 22 12 2019
pubmed: 22 12 2019
medline: 23 5 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Design The study employed a randomised controlled trial methodology and it was delivered electronically as a survey. Intervention Fifty-seven primary and secondary care dentists were randomised to two experimental groups. The participants in both groups assessed a vignette (clinical scenario, clinical photograph and radiograph) with the only difference between the vignettes in the two groups being the patient's race (skin colour: Black or White). The scenario was a case of a severely carious first lower molar with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.Outcome measures The dentists' clinical treatment decisions (recommendation of root canal treatment or extraction) were recorded. A previously validated Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT) was used to measure implicit racial bias.Results A statistically significant difference in dentists' recommendations was observed. Recommendation of root canal treatment was greater for White patients (86.21%) compared to the Black patients (60.71%) and dentists were far more likely to recommend extraction in the Black patient group. The BIAT scores also indicated that pro-White unconscious racial bias was prevalent amongst the participants. Conclusion A patient's race may influence a dentist's decision whether to extract or retain a decayed tooth.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31863040
doi: 10.1038/s41432-019-0062-1
pii: 10.1038/s41432-019-0062-1
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Comment

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101-102

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentOn

Références

Flach J M, Feufel M A, Reynolds P L et al. Decision-making in practice: The dynamics of muddling through. Appl Ergon 2017; 63: 133-141.
Bader J D, Shugars DA. Variation in dentists' clinical decisions. J Public Health Dent 1995; 55: 181-188.
Bader J D, Shugars D A. Understanding dentists' restorative treatment decisions. J Public Health Dent 1992; 52: 102-110.
Kay E, Nuttall N. Clinical decision making - an art or a science? Part II: Making sense of treatment decisions. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 113-116.
Wilson A T. Counterfactual consent and the use of deception in research. Bioethics 2015; 29: 470-477.
Dantas Cabral E, de França Caldas A Jr., Moreira Cabral H A. Influence of the patient's race on the dentist's decision to extract or retain a decayed tooth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33: 461-466.

Auteurs

A Plessas (A)

Peninsula Dental School, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH