Risk factors for failed induction of labor among pregnant women with Class III obesity.


Journal

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1600-0412
Titre abrégé: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370343

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2020
Historique:
received: 06 06 2019
revised: 28 11 2019
accepted: 28 11 2019
pubmed: 22 12 2019
medline: 21 7 2020
entrez: 22 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Our aim was to identify risk factors for failed induction in morbidly obese patients undergoing the induction of labor at term. This was a retrospective multicenter study on a cohort of 235 patients with a body mass index greater than 40 kg/m In all, 235 patients were included. Of these, 62.5% patients delivered vaginally and 37.5% by cesarean section. The frequency of nulliparity was greater in patients who had a cesarean section (56 [interquartile range, IQR, 38.1] vs 56 [IQR 63.6], P < .001). In multivariate analysis, nulliparity (odds ratio [OR] 2.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.58-4.97], P < .001), low Bishop's score (OR .794, 95% CI .70-.90, P < .001) and weight gain (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, P = .033) were independent risk factors for failed induction. Umbilical cord pH at birth lower than 7 (0 vs 7 [IQR 8.0], P < .001) and lower than 7.20 (36 [IQR 24.5] vs 35 [IQR 39.8], P = .014) as well as the Apgar at 1 minute (14 [IQR 9.5] vs 17 [IQR 19.3], P = .032) was significantly higher in infants born by cesarean section. In this cohort, 63% of women with Class III obesity had successful inductions of labor; risk factors for failed induction include nulliparity and unfavorable Bishop score.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31863451
doi: 10.1111/aogs.13794
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Multicenter Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

637-643

Informations de copyright

© 2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Références

Pi-Sunyer FX. Medical hazards of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:655-660.
LaCoursiere DY, Bloebaum L, Duncan JD, Varner MW. Population-based trends and correlates of maternal overweight and obesity, Utah 1991-2001. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:832-839.
Chu SY, Kim SY, Schmid CH, et al. Maternal obesity and risk of cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2007;8:385-394.
Weiss JL, Malone FD, Emig D, et al. Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate-a population-based screening study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1091-1097.
Johnson JW, Longmate JA, Frentzen B. Excessive maternal weight and pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:353-370; discussion 370-372.
Stotland NE, Washington AE, Caughey AB. Prepregnancy body mass index and the length of gestation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197(378):e1-5.
Ehrenberg HM, Iams JD, Goldenberg RL, et al. Maternal obesity, uterine activity, and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:48-52.
Wolfe KB, Rossi RA, Warshak CR. The effect of maternal obesity on the rate of failed induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:128.e1-7.
Pevzner L, Powers BL, Rayburn WF, Rumney P, Wing DA. Effects of maternal obesity on duration and outcomes of prostaglandin cervical ripening and labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:1315-1321.
Nuthalapaty FS, Rouse DJ, Owen J. The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103:452-456.
Matta J, Zins M, Feral-Pierssens AL, et al. Prévalence du surpoids, de l’obésité et des facteurs de risque cardio-métaboliques dans la cohorte Constances. [Overweight, obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors prevalence in France: The CONSTANCES cohort]. In French. Bull Epidémiol Hebd. 2016;35-36:640-646.
Gunatilake RP, Perlow JH. Obesity and pregnancy: clinical management of the obese gravida. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:106-119.
Sebire NJ, Jolly M, Harris JP, et al. Maternal obesity and pregnancy outcome: a study of 287,213 pregnancies in London. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2001;25:1175-1182.
Subramaniam A, Jauk VC, Goss AR, Alvarez MD, Reese C, Edwards RK. Mode of delivery in women with class III obesity: planned cesarean compared with induction of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;211(700):e1-9.
Hermann M, Le Ray C, Blondel B, Goffinet F, Zeitlin J. The risk of prelabor and intrapartum cesarean delivery among overweight and obese women: possible preventive actions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(241):e1-9.
Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français; Société francophone du diabète. Le diabète gestationnel. [Gestational diabetes]. In French. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2010;39(S139):S338-S342.
Gunatilake RP, Smrtka MP, Harris B, et al. Predictors of failed trial of labor among women with an extremely obese body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(562):e1-5.
Torricelli M, Voltolini C, Conti N, Bocchi C, Severi FM, Petraglia F. Weight gain regardless of pre-pregnancy BMI and influence of fetal gender in response to labor induction in postdate pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26:1016-1019.
Rasmussen KM, Abrams B, Bodnar LM, Butte NF, Catalano PM, Maria S-R. Recommendations for weight gain during pregnancy in the context of the obesity epidemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1191-1195.
Suidan RS, Rondon KC, Apuzzio JJ, Williams SF. Labor outcomes of obese patients undergoing induction of labor with misoprostol compared to dinoprostone. Am J Perinatol. 2015;30:187-192.
Grange J, Dimet J, Vital M, Le Thuaut A, Ducarme G. Comparaison sonde à double ballonnet-dinoprostone pour la maturation cervicale chez les femmes obèses à terme. [Double-balloon catheter compared to vaginal dinoprostone for cervical ripening in obese women at term]. In French. Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2017;45:521-527.
Borghesi Y, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Pigeyre M, Deruelle P. Risk of cesarean delivery among pregnant women with class III obesity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017;136:168-174.
Sentilhes L, Vayssière C, Beucher G, et al. Delivery for women with a previous cesarean: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170:25-32.
Varma R, Gupta JK, Smith GCS. Birth after previous cesarean delivery. https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg4511022011.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2015.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:450-463.
O’Dwyer V, O’Kelly S, Monaghan B, Rowan A, Farah N, Turner MJ. Maternal obesity and induction of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92:1414-1418.
Suresh A, Liu A, Poulton A, et al. Comparison of maternal abdominal subcutaneous fat thickness and body mass index as markers for pregnancy outcomes: a stratified cohort study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52:420-426.
Zhang J, Bricker L, Wray S, Quenby S. Poor uterine contractility in obese women. BJOG. 2007;114:343-348.
Grotegut CA, Gunatilake RP, Feng L, Heine RP, Murtha AP. The influence of maternal body mass index on myometrial oxytocin receptor expression in pregnancy. Reprod Sci. 2013;20:1471-1477.
Wuntakal R, Kaler M, Hollingworth T. Women with high BMI: should they be managed differently due to antagonising action of leptin in labour? Med Hypotheses. 2013;80:767-768.
Zhang J, Kendrick A, Quenby S, Wray S. Contractility and calcium signaling of human myometrium are profoundly affected by cholesterol manipulation: implications for labor? Reprod Sci. 2007;14:456-466.
Macara LM, Murphy KW. The contribution of dystocia to the cesarean section rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:71-77.
Subramaniam A, Corvey KJ, Kilgore ML, Edwards RK. Planned cesarean delivery compared to induction of labor in women with class III obesity: a cost-minimization analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:3084-3088.
Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:513-523.
Ruhstaller K. Induction of labor in the obese patient. Semin Perinatol. 2015;39:437-440.

Auteurs

Yohan Kerbage (Y)

Department of Obstetrics, Jeanne de Flandre University Hospital (CHRU), Lille, France.

Marie V Senat (MV)

Gynecology-Obstetrics Service, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre Hospital, Public Hospital Assistance of Paris (APHP), Université Paris Sud, Orsay, France.

Elodie Drumez (E)

Department of Biostatistics, University of Lille, EA 2694 - Public Health: Epidemiology and Quality of Care, University Hospital of Lille (CHU), Lille, France.

Damien Subtil (D)

Department of Obstetrics, Jeanne de Flandre University Hospital (CHRU), Lille, France.

Christophe Vayssiere (C)

Women's-Maternity-Couple Center, Gynecology-Obstetrics Department, Paule de Viguier Hospital, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
UMR 1027 INSERM, Université Paul-Sabatier Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.

Philippe Deruelle (P)

Department of Obstetrics, Jeanne de Flandre University Hospital (CHRU), Lille, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH