Lessons from radiochemotherapy and modern image-guided adaptive brachytherapy followed by hysterectomy.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents
/ administration & dosage
Brachytherapy
/ methods
Chemoradiotherapy
Cisplatin
/ administration & dosage
Female
Humans
Hysterectomy
/ methods
Lymph Node Excision
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Staging
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided
/ methods
Retrospective Studies
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Young Adult
Hysterectomy
Image-guided adaptive brachytherapy
Late morbidity
Locally advanced cervical cancer
Journal
Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2020
02 2020
Historique:
received:
24
09
2019
revised:
28
11
2019
accepted:
01
12
2019
pubmed:
23
12
2019
medline:
6
5
2020
entrez:
23
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To analyze the clinical outcomes and the safety of radiochemotherapy (RCT) and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT) and to evaluate the impact of hysterectomy (HT) as completion of treatment for cervical cancer. 145 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer were treated at our institution. Patients underwent RCT and IGABT, then hysterectomy (HT) as completion of treatment was performed, with the exception of patients with surgical contraindications, para aortic metastatic disease or patients who refused surgery. Clinical outcomes and morbidity were retrospectively reviewed in both groups. Local relapse free survival (LRFS), pelvic relapse free survival (PRFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. Completion HT was performed in 90 (62.1%) patients. Complete histological response and microscopic disease were found in 77 patients (85.6%). Local relapse was observed in 14 patients (9.6%) without differences between completion HT group and the definitive RCT and IGABT group (Odds Ratio OR = 1.73 [0.57-5.23], p = 0.33). The estimated 3-year LRFS and PRFS for the entire population were respectively 90% [84%-94%] and 93% [87%-96%], with no significant differences between them (respectively Hazard Ratio HR = 0.57 [0.20-1.64], p = 0.30 and HR = 0.37 [0.10-1.31], p = 0.12). The estimated 3-year OS rate for the whole population was 84% [75%-91%] with no significant differences between groups (HR = 0.81 [0.32-2.06], p = 0.65). Regarding morbidity, grade ≥ 2 vaginal toxicity was more frequent in the definitive RCT and IGABT group (43.6% vs 26.7%, p = 0.04). All grade 4 toxicity events were reported in the completion HT group. Due to high severe toxicity, RCT and IGABT with dose escalation followed by completion hysterectomy don't seem compatible. No benefit and increased severe late morbidity were observed. Combined intracavitary/interstitial technique is mandatory in large target volume at brachytherapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31864683
pii: S0090-8258(19)31785-8
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.12.001
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Cisplatin
Q20Q21Q62J
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
328-334Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.