Factors influencing residents' interest in gynecologic oncology fellowship.
Burnout
Career
Fellowship
Mentorship
Resident
Journal
Gynecologic oncology reports
ISSN: 2352-5789
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol Rep
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101652231
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2019
Nov 2019
Historique:
received:
15
06
2019
revised:
16
09
2019
accepted:
21
09
2019
entrez:
24
12
2019
pubmed:
24
12
2019
medline:
24
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To identify the role of mentorship and other factors associated with obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) resident interest in pursuing a fellowship in gynecologic oncology. A survey link was emailed to U.S. OB/GYN residency program coordinators to disperse to current residents. The 80-item survey asked about plans to pursue fellowship and influencing factors. Participants were stratified based on decision to pursue a fellowship in gynecologic oncology. Student's Among 236 surveyed residents, 32 (13.6%) were planning to pursue a fellowship in gynecologic oncology. There were no demographic differences favoring the choice of gynecologic oncology; however, trainees at academic programs were more likely to aspire to the subspecialty (p = 0.01). Residents interested in gynecologic oncology had marginally more mentors than others (p = 0.06), were more likely to have a gynecologic oncology mentor (p < 0.01), and were more likely to have cited mentorship as a reason for their career aspirations (p = 0.01). These residents were also less likely to report obvious burnout among faculty and fellows in their department (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). Strong mentor relationships and the display of job satisfaction and work-life balance influence OB/GYN residents' interest in gynecologic oncology fellowships. Programs should consider formal mentorship programs for residents, with priority on matching by subspecialty. The value of fellow and faculty efforts in mentorship should be recognized, and appropriate time should be protected for these relationships, along with efforts to support fellows and faculty at risk for burnout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31867429
doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2019.100504
pii: S2352-5789(19)30093-1
pii: 100504
pmc: PMC6906714
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100504Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
None.
Références
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
pubmed: 18929686
Conn Med. 2009 Mar;73(3):165-70
pubmed: 19353991
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2004 Nov;16(5):259-63
pubmed: 15621540
Curr Surg. 2005 Jul-Aug;62(4):429-35
pubmed: 15964470
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2016 Mar 09;16:17-20
pubmed: 27331129
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Jun;222(6):1230-1239
pubmed: 27106639
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;62(3):444-454
pubmed: 31008731
J Am Coll Radiol. 2009 Sep;6(9):635-42
pubmed: 19720359
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Nov;143(2):421-427
pubmed: 27575910
Urology. 2011 Nov;78(5):986-92
pubmed: 22054361
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;210(6):567.e1-8
pubmed: 24412118
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2001;22(4):266-8
pubmed: 11695806
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Sep;146(3):642-646
pubmed: 28655413
J Grad Med Educ. 2009 Sep;1(1):132-8
pubmed: 21975720
Ophthalmology. 2005 Jul;112(7):1247-54
pubmed: 15921748
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Apr;125(1):8-13
pubmed: 22252098
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jul 15;63(2):155-63
pubmed: 27126345
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2018 Jun 08;25:52-55
pubmed: 29998182