The impact of palliative care consults on deprescribing in palliative cancer patients.


Journal

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer
ISSN: 1433-7339
Titre abrégé: Support Care Cancer
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9302957

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2020
Historique:
received: 04 06 2019
accepted: 05 12 2019
pubmed: 24 12 2019
medline: 10 9 2020
entrez: 24 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The transition from active cancer treatment to palliative care often results in a shift in drug risk-benefit assessment which requires the deprescribing of various medications. Deprescribing in palliative cancer patients can benefit patients by reducing their pill burden, decrease potential side effects, and potentially decrease healthcare costs. In addition, a change in patients' goals of care (GOC) necessitates the alteration of drug therapy which includes both deprescribing and the addition of medications intended to improve quality of life. Depending on a patient's GOC, a medication can be considered as inappropriate. Primary: Comparison between potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) prior to the palliative care consult (PCC) versus after the PCC. Secondary: Association between PIMs and GOC. The study was a 1-year retrospective database review. The study included cancer patients seen by the PCC team at the University of Alberta Hospital. The OncPal guidelines were used to identify and determine the number of PIMs prior to the PCC and after the PCC. The reduction in PIMs prior to PCC versus after the PCC was statistically significant (p value < 0.001), demonstrating the PCC has a positive significant impact on deprescribing PIMs. For our secondary outcome, an overall decrease in PIMs was observed with the changes of GOC. The strength of the correlations was low (r < 0.1), and the p value was 0.056. This study shows the positive impact a PCC has on deprescribing and reveals the importance of using guidelines for deprescribing in palliative cancer patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31867703
doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05234-w
pii: 10.1007/s00520-019-05234-w
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

4107-4113

Auteurs

Helen Marin (H)

CrossCancer Institute, 11560 University Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada. hmarin@ualberta.ca.

Patrick Mayo (P)

University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Vincent Thai (V)

University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Deonne Dersch-Mills (D)

Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Spencer Ling (S)

University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Frances Folkman (F)

Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Carole Chambers (C)

CrossCancer Institute, 11560 University Ave, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2, Canada.
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH