Interkinetic nuclear movements promote apical expansion in pseudostratified epithelia at the expense of apicobasal elongation.
Animals
Body Patterning
/ physiology
Cell Count
Cell Cycle
/ physiology
Cell Nucleus
/ physiology
Cell Polarity
/ physiology
Cell Proliferation
/ physiology
Chick Embryo
Computational Biology
Epithelium
/ embryology
Humans
Models, Biological
Movement
/ physiology
Neuroepithelial Cells
/ cytology
Systems Analysis
Urogenital Abnormalities
/ embryology
Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
/ embryology
Journal
PLoS computational biology
ISSN: 1553-7358
Titre abrégé: PLoS Comput Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238922
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2019
12 2019
Historique:
received:
06
06
2019
accepted:
17
11
2019
revised:
13
01
2020
pubmed:
24
12
2019
medline:
10
3
2020
entrez:
24
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Pseudostratified epithelia (PSE) are a common type of columnar epithelia found in a wealth of embryonic and adult tissues such as ectodermal placodes, the trachea, the ureter, the gut and the neuroepithelium. PSE are characterized by the choreographed displacement of cells' nuclei along the apicobasal axis according to phases of their cell cycle. Such movements, called interkinetic movements (INM), have been proposed to influence tissue expansion and shape and suggested as culprit in several congenital diseases such as CAKUT (Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract) and esophageal atresia. INM rely on cytoskeleton dynamics just as adhesion, contractility and mitosis do. Therefore, long term impairment of INM without affecting proliferation and adhesion is currently technically unachievable. Here we bypassed this hurdle by generating a 2D agent-based model of a proliferating PSE and compared its output to the growth of the chick neuroepithelium to assess the interplay between INM and these other important cell processes during growth of a PSE. We found that INM directly generates apical expansion and apical nuclear crowding. In addition, our data strongly suggest that apicobasal elongation of cells is not an emerging property of a proliferative PSE but rather requires a specific elongation program. We then discuss how such program might functionally link INM, tissue growth and differentiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31869321
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007171
pii: PCOMPBIOL-D-19-00915
pmc: PMC6957215
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1007171Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2016 May;56(3):127-34
pubmed: 26710751
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2011 Oct;23(5):540-6
pubmed: 21807488
J Cell Biol. 2015 Nov 23;211(4):757-63
pubmed: 26598613
Curr Biol. 2007 Dec 18;17(24):2095-104
pubmed: 18082406
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 8;113(10):2660-5
pubmed: 26903658
Dev Dyn. 1992 Dec;195(4):231-72
pubmed: 1304821
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Sep 22;106(38):16487-92
pubmed: 19805325
J Anat. 2005 Nov;207(5):623-35
pubmed: 16313396
Dev Biol. 2017 Dec 1;432(1):14-23
pubmed: 28034699
Development. 2018 May 04;145(9):
pubmed: 29678815
IET Syst Biol. 2017 Apr;11(2):55-64
pubmed: 28476973
Front Cell Neurosci. 2015 Jan 28;8:473
pubmed: 25674051
Biophys J. 2014 Jun 3;106(11):2291-304
pubmed: 24896108
Cell. 2009 Sep 18;138(6):1195-208
pubmed: 19766571
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 May 19;372(1720):null
pubmed: 28348254
Dev Biol. 2015 Aug 15;404(2):113-24
pubmed: 26079577
Int Rev Cell Mol Biol. 2016;325:89-118
pubmed: 27241219
Dev Growth Differ. 2012 Apr;54(3):306-16
pubmed: 22524603
J R Soc Interface. 2012 Nov 7;9(76):2983-96
pubmed: 22696488
Trends Cell Biol. 2016 Jun;26(6):420-433
pubmed: 26920934
Nucleus. 2017 Mar 4;8(2):126-133
pubmed: 28060557
J Comp Neurol. 1997 May 19;381(4):473-88
pubmed: 9136804
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013 Dec;23(6):951-6
pubmed: 23973156
Anat Sci Int. 2013 Jan;88(1):31-7
pubmed: 23054939
Cell Prolif. 2001 Aug;34(4):253-66
pubmed: 11529883
EMBO J. 2011 May 4;30(9):1690-704
pubmed: 21441895
Cell Cycle. 2017 Feb;16(3):247-248
pubmed: 27792466
PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Feb 13;13(2):e1005387
pubmed: 28192427
J Cell Sci. 2017 Jun 1;130(11):1859-1863
pubmed: 28455413
Mol Biol Cell. 2008 May;19(5):2289-99
pubmed: 18337466
Congenit Anom (Kyoto). 2018 Mar;58(2):62-70
pubmed: 28782137
Nature. 2015 Feb 12;518(7538):245-8
pubmed: 25607361
Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2010 Oct;33(2):117-27
pubmed: 21082210
J Cell Biol. 2015 Nov 23;211(4):765-74
pubmed: 26598614
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Dec;13(12):1463-71
pubmed: 21037580
Phys Rev E. 2017 Aug;96(2-1):022418
pubmed: 28950595
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 15;111(15):5586-91
pubmed: 24706777
Brain Dev. 2009 Aug;31(7):553-7
pubmed: 19464833
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 7;111(1):27-32
pubmed: 24367079
Hum Mol Genet. 2011 Mar 15;20(6):1061-73
pubmed: 21177258
Dev Biol. 2012 Oct 1;370(1):33-41
pubmed: 22884563
J Comp Neurol. 1994 Apr 1;342(1):144-51
pubmed: 8207124
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2016 Dec;15(6):1733-1746
pubmed: 27193152
Bull Math Biol. 2010 Oct;72(7):1696-731
pubmed: 20082148
J Math Biol. 2009 Apr;58(4-5):657-87
pubmed: 18841363
Neurosci Res. 2014 Sep;86:88-95
pubmed: 24780233
Dev Biol. 1984 Oct;105(2):257-72
pubmed: 6479439
Math Biosci Eng. 2013 Feb;10(1):235-61
pubmed: 23311371