Exploratory study of "real world" implementation of a clinical poverty tool in diverse family medicine and pediatric care settings.


Journal

International journal for equity in health
ISSN: 1475-9276
Titre abrégé: Int J Equity Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101147692

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 12 2019
Historique:
received: 04 09 2019
accepted: 04 11 2019
entrez: 25 12 2019
pubmed: 25 12 2019
medline: 28 3 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Poverty is associated with increased morbidity related to multiple child and adult health conditions and increased risk of premature death. Despite robust evidence linking income and health, and some recommendations for universal screening, poverty screening is not routinely conducted in clinical care. We conducted an exploratory study of implementing universal poverty screening and intervention in family medicine and a range of pediatric care settings (primary through tertiary). After attending a training session, health care providers (HCPs) were instructed to perform universal screening using a clinical poverty tool with the question "Do you ever have difficulty making ends meet at the end of the month?" for the three-month implementation period. HCPs tracked the number of patients screened and a convenience sample of their patients were surveyed regarding the acceptability of being screened for poverty in a healthcare setting. HCPs participated in semi-structured focus groups to explore barriers to and facilitators of universal implementation of the tool. Twenty-two HCPs (10 pediatricians, 9 family physicians, 3 nurse practitioners) participated and 150 patients completed surveys. Eighteen HCPs participated in focus groups. Despite the self-described motivation of the HCPs, screening rates were low (9% according to self-reported numbers). The majority of patients either supported (72%) or were neutral (22%) about the appropriateness of HCPs screening for and intervening on poverty. HCPs viewed poverty as relevant to clinical care but identified time constraints, physician discomfort, lack of expertise and habitual factors as barriers to implementation of universal screening. Poverty screening is important and acceptable to clinicians and patients. However, multiple barriers need to be addressed to allow for successful implementation of poverty screening and intervention in health care settings.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Poverty is associated with increased morbidity related to multiple child and adult health conditions and increased risk of premature death. Despite robust evidence linking income and health, and some recommendations for universal screening, poverty screening is not routinely conducted in clinical care.
METHODS
We conducted an exploratory study of implementing universal poverty screening and intervention in family medicine and a range of pediatric care settings (primary through tertiary). After attending a training session, health care providers (HCPs) were instructed to perform universal screening using a clinical poverty tool with the question "Do you ever have difficulty making ends meet at the end of the month?" for the three-month implementation period. HCPs tracked the number of patients screened and a convenience sample of their patients were surveyed regarding the acceptability of being screened for poverty in a healthcare setting. HCPs participated in semi-structured focus groups to explore barriers to and facilitators of universal implementation of the tool.
RESULTS
Twenty-two HCPs (10 pediatricians, 9 family physicians, 3 nurse practitioners) participated and 150 patients completed surveys. Eighteen HCPs participated in focus groups. Despite the self-described motivation of the HCPs, screening rates were low (9% according to self-reported numbers). The majority of patients either supported (72%) or were neutral (22%) about the appropriateness of HCPs screening for and intervening on poverty. HCPs viewed poverty as relevant to clinical care but identified time constraints, physician discomfort, lack of expertise and habitual factors as barriers to implementation of universal screening.
CONCLUSIONS
Poverty screening is important and acceptable to clinicians and patients. However, multiple barriers need to be addressed to allow for successful implementation of poverty screening and intervention in health care settings.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31870364
doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1085-0
pii: 10.1186/s12939-019-1085-0
pmc: PMC6929298
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

200

Références

J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;30(4):428-447
pubmed: 28720625
Acad Pediatr. 2011 Sep-Oct;11(5):387-93
pubmed: 21640683
BMC Public Health. 2006 Jun 21;6:162
pubmed: 16790053
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Mar;25(3):138-40
pubmed: 26744423
Milbank Q. 2002;80(3):433-79, iii
pubmed: 12233246
J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):348-55
pubmed: 27170792
Annu Rev Public Health. 1997;18:463-83
pubmed: 9143727
Holist Nurs Pract. 1991 Oct;6(1):76-85
pubmed: 1918188
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 17;7(8):e014270
pubmed: 28821508
Int J Equity Health. 2015 Dec 14;14:152
pubmed: 26694168
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 7;374(1):8-11
pubmed: 26731305
J Integr Care (Brighton). 2018;26(3):231-241
pubmed: 30166944
BMC Public Health. 2007 Jan 24;7:12
pubmed: 17250771
Health Econ. 2014 Apr;23(4):473-86
pubmed: 23843197
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 22;7(10):e015947
pubmed: 29061603
Pediatr Rev. 2018 May;39(5):235-246
pubmed: 29716966
Pediatrics. 2016 Apr;137(4):
pubmed: 26962239
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Aug;49(2):161-71
pubmed: 25960393
Int J Family Med. 2015;2015:418125
pubmed: 26483977
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Oct 13;11:59
pubmed: 23061433
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD001096
pubmed: 19588323
Healthc Q. 2010;14 Spec No 1:32-40
pubmed: 20959745
Acad Med. 2018 Jan;93(1):25-30
pubmed: 28445214
J Public Health Med. 2002 Dec;24(4):307-12
pubmed: 12546209
BMC Public Health. 2006 Mar 29;6:81
pubmed: 16571122
BMJ. 1993 Jun 5;306(6891):1518-20
pubmed: 8518682
Int J Family Med. 2011;2011:812182
pubmed: 22312547
Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1):e232-46
pubmed: 22201156
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;(6):CD000259
pubmed: 22696318
J Am Board Fam Med. 2017 Jul-Aug;30(4):418-427
pubmed: 28720624
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Dec;65(12):e27380
pubmed: 30069999
Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 Feb;37(2):240-247
pubmed: 29401027
Acad Pediatr. 2016 Mar;16(2):168-74
pubmed: 26183003

Auteurs

Eva Purkey (E)

Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5E9, Canada. eva.purkey@dfm.queensu.ca.

Imaan Bayoumi (I)

Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5E9, Canada.

Helen Coo (H)

Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.

Allison Maier (A)

Kingston, Frontenac and Lennox & Addington Public Health Unit, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Andrew D Pinto (AD)

Department of Family and Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, The Upstream Lab, Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Ontario, Canada.

Bisola Olomola (B)

Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.

Christina Klassen (C)

Department of Family Medicine, Queen's University, 220 Bagot street, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5E9, Canada.

Shannon French (S)

Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.

Michael Flavin (M)

Department of Pediatrics, Queen's University, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH