Robotic body weight support enables safe stair negotiation in compliance with basic locomotor principles.


Journal

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
ISSN: 1743-0003
Titre abrégé: J Neuroeng Rehabil
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101232233

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 12 2019
Historique:
received: 04 09 2019
accepted: 11 12 2019
entrez: 25 12 2019
pubmed: 25 12 2019
medline: 1 7 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

After a neurological injury, mobility focused rehabilitation programs intensively train walking on treadmills or overground. However, after discharge, quite a few patients are not able to independently negotiate stairs, a real-world task with high physical and psychological demands and a high injury risk. To decrease fall risk and improve patients' capacity to navigate typical environments, early stair negotiation training can help restore competence and confidence in safe stair negotiation. One way to enable early training in a safe and permissive environment is to unload the patient with a body weight support system. We here investigated if unloaded stair negotiation complies with basic locomotor principles, in terms of enabling performance of a physiological movement pattern with minimal compensation. Seventeen able-bodied participants were unloaded with 0-50% bodyweight during self-paced ascent and descent of a 4-tread staircase. Spatio-temporal parameters, joint ranges of motion, ground reaction forces and myoelectric activity in the main lower limb muscles of participants were compared between unloading levels. Likelihood ratio tests of separated linear mixed models of the investigated outcomes assessed if unloading affects the parameters in general. Subsequent post-hoc testing revealed which levels of unloading differed from unsupported stair negotiation. Unloading affected walking velocity, joint ranges of motion, vertical ground reaction force parameters and myoelectric activity in all investigated muscles for stair ascent and descent while step width and single support duration were only affected during ascent. A reduction with increasing levels of body weight support was seen in walking velocity (0.07-0.12 m/s), ranges of motion of the knee and hip (2-10°), vertical ground reaction force peaks (10-70%) and myoelectric activity (17-70%). An increase with unloading was only seen during ascent for ankle range of motion and tibialis anterior activity at substantial unloading. Body weight support facilitates stair negotiation by providing safety and support against gravity. Although unloading effects are present in most parameters, up to 30% body weight support these changes are small, and no dysfunctional patterns are introduced. Body weight support therefore fulfills all the necessary requirements for early stair negotiation training.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
After a neurological injury, mobility focused rehabilitation programs intensively train walking on treadmills or overground. However, after discharge, quite a few patients are not able to independently negotiate stairs, a real-world task with high physical and psychological demands and a high injury risk. To decrease fall risk and improve patients' capacity to navigate typical environments, early stair negotiation training can help restore competence and confidence in safe stair negotiation. One way to enable early training in a safe and permissive environment is to unload the patient with a body weight support system. We here investigated if unloaded stair negotiation complies with basic locomotor principles, in terms of enabling performance of a physiological movement pattern with minimal compensation.
METHODS
Seventeen able-bodied participants were unloaded with 0-50% bodyweight during self-paced ascent and descent of a 4-tread staircase. Spatio-temporal parameters, joint ranges of motion, ground reaction forces and myoelectric activity in the main lower limb muscles of participants were compared between unloading levels. Likelihood ratio tests of separated linear mixed models of the investigated outcomes assessed if unloading affects the parameters in general. Subsequent post-hoc testing revealed which levels of unloading differed from unsupported stair negotiation.
RESULTS
Unloading affected walking velocity, joint ranges of motion, vertical ground reaction force parameters and myoelectric activity in all investigated muscles for stair ascent and descent while step width and single support duration were only affected during ascent. A reduction with increasing levels of body weight support was seen in walking velocity (0.07-0.12 m/s), ranges of motion of the knee and hip (2-10°), vertical ground reaction force peaks (10-70%) and myoelectric activity (17-70%). An increase with unloading was only seen during ascent for ankle range of motion and tibialis anterior activity at substantial unloading.
CONCLUSIONS
Body weight support facilitates stair negotiation by providing safety and support against gravity. Although unloading effects are present in most parameters, up to 30% body weight support these changes are small, and no dysfunctional patterns are introduced. Body weight support therefore fulfills all the necessary requirements for early stair negotiation training.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31870393
doi: 10.1186/s12984-019-0631-8
pii: 10.1186/s12984-019-0631-8
pmc: PMC6929285
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

157

Références

J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017 Apr 4;14(1):25
pubmed: 28376829
Braz J Phys Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;18(6):572-9
pubmed: 25590450
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 May;90(5):498-506
pubmed: 30770457
Mov Disord. 2005 Jan;20(1):89-94
pubmed: 15390043
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 14;11:CD006073
pubmed: 27841442
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013 Jun;2013:6650483
pubmed: 24187300
Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Feb;30(1):48-54
pubmed: 27845945
Phys Ther. 1991 Nov;71(11):842-55; discussion 855-6
pubmed: 1946621
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2008;26(1):16-22
pubmed: 18511867
Gait Posture. 2002 Feb;15(1):32-44
pubmed: 11809579
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jan 1;140(1):
pubmed: 28857115
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Mar 13;15(1):18
pubmed: 29534730
J Biomech. 2007;40(14):3244-50
pubmed: 17583716
J Exp Biol. 1997 Dec;200(Pt 24):3193-201
pubmed: 9364025
J Biomech. 2008;41(8):1639-50
pubmed: 18466909
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:4058-61
pubmed: 25570883
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980 Jul;62(5):749-57
pubmed: 7391098
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Nov 12;15(1):102
pubmed: 30419945
Front Physiol. 2017 Nov 07;8:893
pubmed: 29163225
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Dec;25(6):982-9
pubmed: 26443891
J Biomech. 2007;40(11):2530-6
pubmed: 17239890
Gait Posture. 2003 Jun;17(3):235-45
pubmed: 12770637
J Biomech. 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2662-2668
pubmed: 27282960
Appl Ergon. 2012 May;43(3):473-8
pubmed: 21843878
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018 Jun 20;15(1):53
pubmed: 29925400
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jul;45(7):2122-8
pubmed: 15223785
Gait Posture. 2006 Aug;24(1):35-45
pubmed: 16099161
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2015 Jun;30(5):454-61
pubmed: 25798857
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005 Summer;12(3):58-65
pubmed: 16110428
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Dec 01;6:43
pubmed: 19951435
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Dec 24;7:887
pubmed: 24399951
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2011;2011:5975415
pubmed: 22275618
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(4):287-98
pubmed: 21674384
J Physiol. 2000 Nov 1;528(Pt 3):657-68
pubmed: 11060138
Biom J. 2008 Jun;50(3):346-63
pubmed: 18481363
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 May;48(5):567-80
pubmed: 10811553
J Biomech. 1988;21(9):733-44
pubmed: 3182877
Front Physiol. 2018 Jan 04;8:985
pubmed: 29354060
J Biomech. 2012 Feb 2;45(3):555-61
pubmed: 22169134
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Feb;22(2):203-10
pubmed: 17126461
Gait Posture. 2012 Jun;36(2):231-5
pubmed: 22424758
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2017 Jul;2017:412-417
pubmed: 28813854
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Jun;46(12):1569-85
pubmed: 9672396
Front Neurorobot. 2017 Oct 27;11:57
pubmed: 29163120
Compr Ther. 2000 Winter;26(4):238-45
pubmed: 11126093
Gait Posture. 2011 Jul;34(3):421-5
pubmed: 21764316
Sci Transl Med. 2017 Jul 19;9(399):
pubmed: 28724575
PM R. 2017 Jan;9(1):46-62
pubmed: 27565639
Gait Posture. 2002 Feb;15(1):64-74
pubmed: 11809582
Am J Phys Med. 1976 Dec;55(6):275-90
pubmed: 998748
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010 Feb 11;7:6
pubmed: 20149244
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot. 2013 Jun;2013:6650512
pubmed: 24187327
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 04;9(2):e87987
pubmed: 24505342

Auteurs

M Bannwart (M)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland. mathias.bannwart@hest.ethz.ch.
Sensory Motor Systems Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland. mathias.bannwart@hest.ethz.ch.

E Rohland (E)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

C A Easthope (CA)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Cereneo Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Vitznau, Switzerland.

G Rauter (G)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Sensory Motor Systems Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland.
BIROMED-Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University Basel, Gewerbestrasse 14, CH-4123, Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland.

M Bolliger (M)

Spinal Cord Injury Center, Balgrist University Hospital, Forchstrasse 340, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH