Incidental Findings of Computed Tomography Angiography in Patients Suspected to Pulmonary Embolism; a Brief Report.
Pulmonary embolism
emergencies
incidental findings
tomography
Journal
Archives of academic emergency medicine
ISSN: 2645-4904
Titre abrégé: Arch Acad Emerg Med
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101740147
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
22
10
2019
entrez:
26
12
2019
pubmed:
26
12
2019
medline:
26
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) scans are increasingly used in emergency department (ED). Therefore, the observation of incidental findings (IFs) has also increased. This study aimed to evaluate the frequency of IFs in patients who underwent CTPA. All consecutive patients that underwent CTPA scanning for pulmonary embolism (PE) rule out between January 2017 and June 2018 were analysed. Incidental findings were divided into and reported in three categories: group 1 potentially life-threatening, group 2 required follow up, and group 3 with limited clinical significance. 151 cases with the mean age of 61.2 ± 17.6 years were studied (54.3% female). PE was documented in 77 cases (50.9%). 448 IFs were detected (3 IFs were found per patient). 60 (13.3%) IFs were classified as group 1, 180 (40.1%) as group 2, and 208 (46.6%) as group 3. Cardiomegaly was the most frequent finding in group 1 (n=32), followed by aortic aneurysm (n=13). In group 2, pleural effusion (n=58) and pneumonia (n=36) were the most frequent incidental findings. Lung structure changes (n=92) and thoracic bone related findings (n=43) were the most common IFs observed in group 3. IFs were detected in the majority of patients that underwent CTPA. Most of these findings do not require follow-up or treatment. However, more than 50% of cases may require further diagnostic evaluation (40.1%) or immediate treatment (13.3%).
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e60Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared that there is no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
Emerg Med Australas. 2018 Feb;30(1):134-135
pubmed: 29205861
Radiol Clin North Am. 2011 Mar;49(2):245-55
pubmed: 21333776
Radiology. 2005 Jun;235(3):798-803
pubmed: 15845793
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jun;11(6):642-7
pubmed: 15175202
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 14;35(43):3033-69, 3069a-3069k
pubmed: 25173341
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1961-5
pubmed: 19933956
J Thromb Haemost. 2005 Nov;3(11):2449-56
pubmed: 16241943
Br J Radiol. 2010 Apr;83(988):276-89
pubmed: 20335439
Emerg Med J. 2006 Mar;23(3):172-8
pubmed: 16498151
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2015 May;12(5):689-95
pubmed: 25713998
J Intern Med. 2004 Aug;256(2):153-60
pubmed: 15257728
Chest. 2013 Dec;144(6):1893-1899
pubmed: 23989896
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2019 Jun 09;3(3):315-330
pubmed: 31294318
Thorax. 2018 May;73(5):464-471
pubmed: 29133351