DETERMinants of quality of life, care and costs, and consequences of INequalities in people with Dementia and their carers (DETERMIND): A protocol paper.

Alzheimer's disease Dementia LGBT+ caregiving cost of care decision-making deprivation diagnosis ethnicity gender inequalities inequities self-funding services

Journal

International journal of geriatric psychiatry
ISSN: 1099-1166
Titre abrégé: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8710629

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2020
Historique:
received: 18 10 2019
accepted: 24 11 2019
pubmed: 27 12 2019
medline: 21 11 2020
entrez: 27 12 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

DETERMIND (DETERMinants of quality of life, care and costs, and consequences of INequalities in people with Dementia and their carers) is designed to address fundamental, and, as yet unanswered questions about inequalities, outcomes and costs following diagnosis with dementia. These answers are needed to improve the quality of care and equity of access to care, and therefore the quality of life, of people with dementia and their carers. DETERMIND is a programme of research consisting of seven complementary workstreams (WS) exploring various components that may result in unequal dementia care: WS1: Recruitment and follow-up of the DETERMIND cohort-900 people with dementia and their carers from three geographically and socially diverse sites within six months following diagnosis, and follow them up for three years. WS2: Investigation of the extent of inequalities in access to dementia care. WS3: Relationship between use and costs of services and outcomes. WS4: Experiences of self-funders of care. WS5: Decision-making processes for people with dementia and carers. WS6: Effect of diagnostic stage and services on outcomes. WS7: Theory of Change informed strategy and actions for applying the research findings. During the life of the programme, analysing baseline results and then follow-up of the DETERMIND cohort over 3 years, we will establish evidence on current services and practice. DETERMIND will deliver novel, detailed data on inequalities in dementia care and what drives positive and negative outcomes and costs for people with dementia and carers, and identify factors that help or hinder living well with dementia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31876069
doi: 10.1002/gps.5246
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

290-301

Subventions

Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17214
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : ES/S010351/1
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Références

Wallace SP. The no-care zone: availability, accessibility, and acceptability in community-based long-term care. The Gerontologist. 1990;30(2):254-261.
Miranda-Castillo C, Woods B, Galboda K, Oomman S, Olojugba C, Orrell M. Unmet needs, quality of life and support networks of people with dementia living at home. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8(1):132.
Hoe J, Hancock G, Livingston G, Orrell M. Quality of life of people with dementia in residential care homes. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188(5):460-464.
Daly S, Allen J. Inequalities in Mental Health, Cognitive Impairement and Dementia Among Older People. London: University College London Institute of Health Equity; 2016.
Black BS, Johnston D, Rabins PV, Morrison A, Lyketsos C, Samus QM. Unmet needs of community-residing persons with dementia and their informal caregivers: findings from the maximizing independence at home study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(12):2087-2095.
Cooper C, Lodwick R, Walters K, et al. Observational cohort study: deprivation and access to anti-dementia drugs in the UK. Age Ageing. 2015;45(1):148-154.
Leist A. Social inequalities in dementia care, cure, and research. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017;65(5):1100-1101.
Public Health England. Prevalence of dementia in population groups by protected characteristics: a systematic review of the literature. 2015.
Ilinca S, Rodrigues R, Schmidt A. Fairness and eligibility to long-term care: an analysis of the factors driving inequality and inequity in the use of home care for older Europeans. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1224.
Kenning C, Daker-White G, Blakemore A, Panagioti M, Waheed W. Barriers and facilitators in accessing dementia care by ethnic minority groups: a meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):316.
Parveen S, Peltier C, Oyebode JR. Perceptions of dementia and use of services in minority ethnic communities: a scoping exercise. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(2):734-742.
Ferguson-Coleman E, Keady J, Young A. Dementia and the deaf community: knowledge and service access. Aging Ment Health. 2014;18(6):674-682.
Dilworth-Anderson P, Pierre G, Hilliard TS. Social justice, health disparities, and culture in the care of the elderly. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40(1):26-32.
Callard F, Broadbent M, Denis M, et al. Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using electronic health records. BMJ Open. 2014;4(12):e005654.
Comas-Herrera A, Knapp M, Wittenberg R, et al. MODEM: a comprehensive approach to modelling outcome and costs impacts of interventions for dementia. Protocol paper. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):25.
The Institute for Fiscal Studies. ELSA English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. 2011.
Matthews FE, Arthur A, Barnes LE, et al. A two-decade comparison of prevalence of dementia in individuals aged 65 years and older from three geographical areas of England: results of the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study I and II. Lancet. 2013;382(9902):1405-1412.
Curtis L, Burns A. Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2017. Canterbury: PSSRU, University of Kent; 2017.
Bassal C, Czellar J, Kaiser S, Dan-Glauser ES. Relationship between emotions, emotion regulation, and well-being of professional caregivers of people with dementia. Res Aging. 2016;38(4):477-503.
Monin JK, Schulz R, Kershaw TS. Caregiving spouses' attachment orientations and the physical and psychological health of individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Aging Ment Health. 2013;17(4):508-516.
Bunn F, Goodman C, Sworn K, et al. Psychosocial factors that shape patient and carer experiences of dementia diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of qualitative studies. PLoS Med. 2012;9(10):e1001331.
Brooker D, Fontaine JL, Evans S, Bray J, Saad K. Public health guidance to facilitate timely diagnosis of dementia: ALzheimer's COoperative Valuation in Europe recommendations. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;29(7):682-693.
Brossard B, Carpentier N. To what extent does diagnosis matter? Dementia diagnosis, trouble interpretation and caregiving network dynamics. Sociol Health Illn. 2017;39(4):566-580.
Thomas AJ, Taylor JP, McKeith I, et al. Development of assessment toolkits for improving the diagnosis of the Lewy body dementias: feasibility study within the DIAMOND Lewy study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2017;32(12):1280-1304.
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68.
Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol'too long: Consider the brief cope. Int J Behav Med. 1997;4(1):92.
Bucks RS, Ashworth D, Wilcock G, Siegfried K. Assessment of activities of daily living in dementia: development of the Bristol Activities of Daily Living Scale. Age Ageing. 1996;25(2):113-120.
Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-383.
Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, FitzGerald P, Parkes KR. The cognitive failures questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol. 1982;21(1):1-16.
Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43:2412-2414.
Beecham J, Knapp M. Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI). Database of Instruments for Resource Use Management 1992.
Menne HL, Tucke SS, Whitlatch CJ, Feinberg LF. Decision-making involvement scale for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement. 2008;23(1):23-29.
Brown A, Page TE, Daley S, et al. Measuring the quality of life of family carers of people with dementia: development and validation of C-DEMQOL. Qual Life Res. 2019;28:2299-2310.
Smith S, Lamping D, Banerjee S, et al. Measurement of health-related quality of life for people with dementia: development of a new instrument (DEMQOL) and an evaluation of current methodology. Health Technol Assess (Winch Eng). 2005;9(10):1-93.
Niven K, Totterdell P, Stride CB, Holman D. Emotion Regulation of Others and Self (EROS): The development and validation of a new individual difference measure. Curr Psychol. 2011;30(1):53-73.
The EuroQoL Group. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199-208.
Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med. 1979;41(3):209-218.
Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67(6):1063.
Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, et al. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. The Gerontologist. 2006;46(4):503-513.
Fredrickson BL, Tugade MM, Waugh CE, Larkin GR. What good are positive emotions in crisis? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11th, 2001. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(2):365.
Haslam C, Holme A, Haslam SA, Iyer A, Jetten J, Williams WH. Maintaining group memberships: Social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;18(5-6):671-691.
Cummings JL, Mega M, Gray K, Rosenberg-Thompson S, Carusi DA, Gornbein J. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology. 1994;44(12):2308-2308.
The Office for National Statistics. Personal well-being user guidance, 2006. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/wellbeing/methodologies/personalwellbeingsurveyuserguide. Accessed December 3, 2018.
Baltes P, Baltes M, Freund A, Lang F. Measurement of Selective Optimization with Compensation by Questionnaire. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for Human Development; 1995.
Robins RW, Hendin HM, Trzesniewski KH. Measuring global self-esteem: construct validation of a single-item measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 2001;27(2):151-161.
Harris PR, Griffin DW, Napper LE, et al. Individual differences in self-affirmation: distinguishing self-affirmation from positive self-regard. Self Identity. 2018;18(6):589-630.
Molloy DW, Standish TI. A guide to the standardized mini-mental state examination. Int Psychogeriatr. 1997;9(S1):87-94.
Army U. Army individual test battery. Manual of directions and scoring. Washington, DC: War Department, Adjutant General's Office; 1944.
Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist. 1980;20(6):649-655.

Auteurs

Nicolas Farina (N)

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Ben Hicks (B)

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Kate Baxter (K)

Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.

Yvonne Birks (Y)

Social Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.

Carol Brayne (C)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Margaret Dangoor (M)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Josie Dixon (J)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Peter R Harris (PR)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Bo Hu (B)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Martin Knapp (M)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Eleanor Miles (E)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Rotem Perach (R)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Sanna Read (S)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Louise Robinson (L)

Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

Jennifer Rusted (J)

School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Rob Stewart (R)

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Alan Thomas (A)

Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.

Raphael Wittenberg (R)

Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.

Sube Banerjee (S)

Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH