Collaboration between breast and reconstructive surgery in optimizing outcomes for women with breast cancer.
breast cancer
collaboration
reconstructive surgery
Journal
The breast journal
ISSN: 1524-4741
Titre abrégé: Breast J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9505539
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2020
01 2020
Historique:
received:
25
09
2019
accepted:
25
09
2019
pubmed:
27
12
2019
medline:
27
10
2020
entrez:
27
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Performing successful breast reconstruction after mastectomy requires communication and collaboration between the breast and reconstruction surgery teams. This allows for oncologic safety while providing esthetic and functional reconstruction. In this article, we discuss the numerous techniques we have adopted successfully into our breast reconstructive practice that were possible due to this collaboration including prophylactic lymphaticovenous bypass (LVB), tumor ultrasound-guided incision (TUGI), esthetic closure in patients not eligible or desiring reconstruction, nerve identification at time of mastectomy to allow for sensate reconstruction, and the prevention of chronic pain and strategic oncoplasty.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
42-46Informations de copyright
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Références
de Vries M, Vonkeman WG, van Ginkel RJ, Hoekstra HJ. Morbidity after inguinal sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32:785-789.
Hyngstrom JR, Chiang YJ, Cromwell KD, et al. Prospective assessment of lymphedema incidence and lymphedema-associated symptoms following lymph node surgery for melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2013;23:290-297.
Halsted WSI. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894. Ann Surg. 1894;20:497-555.
Rebegea L, Firescu D, Dumitru M, Anghel R. The incidence and risk factors for occurrence of arm lymphedema after treatment of breast cancer. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2015;110:33-37.
Thompson M, Korourian S, Henry-Tillman R, et al. Axillary reverse mapping (ARM): a new concept to identify and enhance lymphatic preservation. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:1890-1895.
Basta MN, Gao LL, Wu LC. Operative treatment of peripheral lymphedema: a systematic meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of lymphovenous microsurgery and tissue transplantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:905-913.
Silva AK, Chang DW. Vascularized lymph node transfer and lymphovenous bypass: novel treatment strategies for symptomatic lymphedema. J Surg Oncol. 2016;113:932-939.
Nos C, Lesieur B, Clough KB, Lecuru F. Blue dye injection in the arm in order to conserve the lymphatic drainage of the arm in breast cancer patients requiring an axillary dissection. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007;14:2490-2496.
Boneti C, Korourian S, Bland K, et al. Axillary reverse mapping: mapping and preserving arm lymphatics may be important in preventing lymphedema during sentinel lymph node biopsy. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(5):1038-1042; discussion 1042-4.
Klimberg VS. A new concept toward the prevention of lymphedema: axillary reverse mapping. J Surg Oncol. 2008;97:563-564.
Casabona F, Bogliolo S, Ferrero S, et al. Axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer: a new microsurgical lymphatic-venous procedure in the prevention of arm lymphedema. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:3318-3319.
Boccardo F, Casabona F, De Cian F, et al. Lymphedema microsurgical preventive healing approach: a new technique for primary prevention of arm lymphedema after mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:703-708.
Ponzone R, Mininanni P, Cassina E, Sismondi P. Axillary reverse mapping in breast cancer: can we spare what we find? Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(1):390-391.
Rossi C, Mingozzi M, Curcio A, et al. Nipple areola complex sparing mastectomy. Gland Surg. 2015;4:528-540.
Benson JR, Dumitru D, Malata CM. Oncologic safety of conservative mastectomy in the therapeutic setting. Gland Surg. 2016;5:37-46.
Laronga C, Smith P. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: an oncologic and cosmetic perspective. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014;23:549-566.
Menon RS, van Geel AN. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59:81-84.
Verma GR, Kumar A, Joshi K. Nipple involvement in peripheral breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Indian J Cancer. 1997;34:1-5.
Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS. Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24:15-16.
Warren Peled A, Foster RD, Stover AC, et al. Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3402-3409.
Piper M, Peled AW, Foster RD, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;70:435-437.
Spear SL, Willey SC, Feldman ED, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for prophylactic and therapeutic indications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1005-1014.
Endara M, Chen D, Verma K, et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: a systematic review of the literature with pooled analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132:1043-1054.
Munhoz AM, Montag E, Filassi JR, et al. Immediate nipple-areola-sparing mastectomy reconstruction: an update on oncological and reconstruction techniques. World J Clin Oncol. 2014;5:478-494.
Crowe Jr JP, Kim JA, Yetman R, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: technique and results of 54 procedures. Arch Surg. 2004;139:148-150.
Rusby JE, Brachtel EF, Taghian A, Michaelson JS, Koerner FC, Smith BL. George Peters Award. Microscopic anatomy within the nipple: implications for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Am J Surg. 2007;194:433-437.
Stanec Z, Zic R, Stanec S, et al. Skin-sparing mastectomy with nipple-areola conservation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(1):496-498.
Palmieri B, Baitchev G, Grappolini S, et al. Delayed nipple-sparing modified subcutaneous mastectomy: rationale and technique. Breast J. 2005;11:173-178.
Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34:143-148.
Jensen JA, Orringer JS, Giuliano AE. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in 99 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:1665-1670.
Stolier AJ, Sullivan SK, Dellacroce FJ. Technical considerations in nipple-sparing mastectomy: 82 consecutive cases without necrosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15:1341-1347.
Rawlani V, Fiuk J, Johnson SA, et al. The effect of incision choice on outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy reconstruction. Can J Plast Surg. 2011;19:129-133.
Agrawal A, Sibbering DM, Courtney C-A. Skin sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a review. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39:320-328.
Blechman KM, Karp NS, Levovitz C, et al. The lateral inframammary fold incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy: outcomes from over 50 immediate implant-based breast reconstructions. Breast J. 2013;19:31-40.
Fernando EJ, Eskenazi BR, Djohan RS, et al. A tumor ultrasound-guided incision (TUGI) approach to nipple-sparing mastectomy: balancing oncologic safety and technical outcomes. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017;17:572-577.
Frederick MJ, Berhanu AE, Bartlett R. Chest surgery in female to male transgender individuals. Ann Plast Surg. 2017;78:249-253.
Frey JD, Yu JZ, Poudrier G, et al. Modified nipple flap with free areolar graft for component nipple-areola complex construction: outcomes with a novel technique for chest wall reconstruction in transgender men. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;142:331-336.
Crowe JP, Patrick RJ, Yetman RJ, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy update: one hundred forty-nine procedures and clinical outcomes. Arch Surg. 2008;143:1106-1110; discussion 1110.
Grobmyer SR, Pederson HJ, Valente SA, et al. Evolving indications and long-term oncological outcomes of risk-reducing bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy. BJS Open. 2019;3:169-173.
Sarhadi NS, Shaw Dunn J, Lee FD, et al. An anatomical study of the nerve supply of the breast, including the nipple and areola. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:156-164.
Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:905-909.
Tairych GV, Kuzbari R, Rigel S, et al. Normal cutaneous sensibility of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:701-704.
Harbo SO, Jørum E, Roald HE. Reduction mammaplasty: a prospective study of symptom relief and alterations of skin sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(1):103-110; discussion 111-2.
Frost MH, Schaid DJ, Sellers TA, et al. Long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA. 2000;284:319-324.
Pitanguy I, Vaena M, Radwanski HN, et al. Relative implant volume and sensibility alterations after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007;31:238-243.
Craig RD, Sykes PA. Nipple sensitivity following reduction mammaplasty. Br J Plast Surg. 1970;23:165-172.
Kuzbari R, Schlenz I. Reduction mammaplasty and sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: sensuality versus sexuality? Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:3-11.
Temple CL, Hurst LN. Reduction mammaplasty improves breast sensibility. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:72-76.
Mahajan AL, Chapman TW, Mandalia MR, et al. Sun burn as a consequence of resting reading glasses on a reconstructed breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63:e170.
Kay AR, McGeorge D. Susceptibility of the insensate reconstructed breast to burn injury. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99:927.
Gowaily K, Ellabban MG, Iqbal A, et al. Hot water bottle burn to reconstructed breast. Burns. 2004;30:873-874.
Nahabedian MY, McGibbon BM. Thermal injuries in autogenous tissue breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51:599-602.
Enajat M, Rozen WM, Audolfsson T, et al. Thermal injuries in the insensate deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: case series and literature review on mechanisms of injury. Microsurgery. 2009;29:214-217.
Weissler JM, Koltz PF, Carney MJ, et al. Sifting through the evidence: a comprehensive review and analysis of neurotization in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141:550-565.
Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, Spiegel AJ, et al. Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: a systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70:1229-1241.
Knackstedt R, Gatherwright J, Cakmakoglu C, et al. Predictable location of breast sensory nerves for breast reinnervation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143:393-396.
Andersen KG, Kehlet H. Persistent pain after breast cancer treatment: a critical review of risk factors and strategies for prevention. J Pain. 2011;12:725-746.
Hatch MN, Cushing TR, Carlson GD, et al. Neuropathic pain and SCI: Identification and treatment strategies in the 21st century. J Neurol Sci. 2018;384:75-83.
Gatherwright J, Knackstedt R. Targeted breast re-innervation (TBR) for post-mastectomy pain. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019;72(10):1700-1738.
Clough KB, Cuminet J, Fitoussi A, et al. Cosmetic sequelae after conservative treatment for breast cancer: classification and results of surgical correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41:471-481.
D'Aniello C, Grimaldi L, Barbato A, et al. Cosmetic results in 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999;33:419-422.
Chang MM, Huston T, Ascherman J, et al. Oncoplastic breast reduction: maximizing aesthetics and surgical margins. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012;2012:907576.