Erenumab safety and efficacy in migraine: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
entrez:
27
12
2019
pubmed:
27
12
2019
medline:
15
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Erenumab is a new medicine recently approved in the United States of America for the preventive treatment of migraine among adults. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis and evaluation of the efficacy and safety of erenumab among patients with migraine. The electronic databases that were searched comprised PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library, which were independently retrieved by 2 reviewers. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared placebo with erenumab were selected. Mean differences (MDs), pooled risk ratios (RRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively. Five RCTs representing 2928 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed significant reductions in the 50% responder rate (RR 1.55; P < .00001; I = 49%). In addition, the mean monthly migraine days from baseline in the erenumab group compared with placebo (MD-1.32; P < .00001; I = 100%) and migraine-specific medication days) from baseline (MD-1.41; P < .00001; I = 100%) were significantly decreased for the erenumab group as compared with placebo. Furthermore, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline in the 140 mg erenumab group were significantly reduced as compared the 70 mg group (MD = 0.55; P < .00001; I = 90%). Finally, there was no significant difference between the erenumab group and placebo for any adverse event and serious adverse event. Among patients with migraine, both 70 and 140 mg of erenumab were associated with reduced Migraine-specific medication days, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline, and an increased rate of a 50% reduction, in the absence of an increased risk of any serious adverse effect.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Erenumab is a new medicine recently approved in the United States of America for the preventive treatment of migraine among adults. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis and evaluation of the efficacy and safety of erenumab among patients with migraine.
METHODS
METHODS
The electronic databases that were searched comprised PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library, which were independently retrieved by 2 reviewers. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared placebo with erenumab were selected. Mean differences (MDs), pooled risk ratios (RRs), and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous and dichotomous data, respectively.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Five RCTs representing 2928 patients were included. Pooled analysis showed significant reductions in the 50% responder rate (RR 1.55; P < .00001; I = 49%). In addition, the mean monthly migraine days from baseline in the erenumab group compared with placebo (MD-1.32; P < .00001; I = 100%) and migraine-specific medication days) from baseline (MD-1.41; P < .00001; I = 100%) were significantly decreased for the erenumab group as compared with placebo. Furthermore, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline in the 140 mg erenumab group were significantly reduced as compared the 70 mg group (MD = 0.55; P < .00001; I = 90%). Finally, there was no significant difference between the erenumab group and placebo for any adverse event and serious adverse event.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Among patients with migraine, both 70 and 140 mg of erenumab were associated with reduced Migraine-specific medication days, Migraine-specific medication days from baseline, and an increased rate of a 50% reduction, in the absence of an increased risk of any serious adverse effect.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31876735
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018483
pii: 00005792-201912270-00034
pmc: PMC6946432
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor Antagonists
0
erenumab
I5I8VB78VT
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e18483Références
Ann Neurol. 1990 Aug;28(2):183-7
pubmed: 1699472
Ann Neurol. 1993 Jan;33(1):48-56
pubmed: 8388188
Pharm Res. 2017 Sep;34(9):1784-1795
pubmed: 28593473
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016 Jan;356(1):223-31
pubmed: 26559125
Neurol Sci. 2018 Dec;39(12):2097-2106
pubmed: 30182284
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):382-90
pubmed: 26879279
Physiol Rev. 2014 Oct;94(4):1099-142
pubmed: 25287861
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2017 Mar;154:74-78
pubmed: 28129635
Drugs. 2018 Jul;78(11):1157-1161
pubmed: 29968151
Pain Manag. 2018 Nov 1;8(6):415-426
pubmed: 30235976
Curr Opin Neurol. 2017 Jun;30(3):272-280
pubmed: 28240610
Cephalalgia. 2018 May;38(6):1026-1037
pubmed: 29471679
Headache. 2015 Mar;55 Suppl 2:103-22; quiz 123-6
pubmed: 25662743
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 May;103(5):815-825
pubmed: 28736918
Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211
pubmed: 29368949
Cephalalgia. 2018 Sep;38(10):1644-1657
pubmed: 30142988
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2012 Feb;16(1):86-92
pubmed: 22083262
Cephalalgia. 2010 Oct;30(10):1179-86
pubmed: 20855363
N Engl J Med. 2017 Nov 30;377(22):2123-2132
pubmed: 29171821
Lancet. 2018 Nov 24;392(10161):2280-2287
pubmed: 30360965
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 01;4:1
pubmed: 25554246
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jan;16(1):76-87
pubmed: 27836433
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jun;16(6):425-434
pubmed: 28460892