Delivering the diluted contrast agent with saline via a spiral flow tube improves arterial enhancement for contrast enhancement of magnetic resonance angiography of the neck: A retrospective study.
Journal
Medicine
ISSN: 1536-5964
Titre abrégé: Medicine (Baltimore)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985248R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
entrez:
27
12
2019
pubmed:
27
12
2019
medline:
14
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A contrast agent can be pushed by a saline solution more effectively through a spiral flow tube than through a conventional T-shaped tube in contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA). To compare the degree of contrast enhancement and signal stability in the carotid artery by using CEMRA between a spiral flow tube and a T-shaped tube.A total of 100 patients were analyzed in this retrospective study. The first 50 patients underwent CEMRA of the carotid artery with the T-shaped tube, while the last 50 patients used the spiral flow tube. Gadoterate meglumine was diluted with saline to make a total volume of 20 mL. Injection was performed with a bolus rate of 2.5 mL/s for 8 seconds. Five regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on the contrast-enhanced area in each carotid artery and the signal intensity (SI) in the ROI was used for the analysis. The ROIs on the brain stem were also placed and the average SI in this ROI was used as a reference signal. The enhancement of the artery (Eartery) was calculated as a normalized signal using the following equation: Eartery = SI in the ROI of the carotid bifurcation/SI in the ROI of the brain stem. Signal homogeneity in the contrast-enhanced area (SHenhance) was assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation from the SI in the 5 ROIs. The value of SHenhance and Eartery between the data obtained from the spiral flow tube and the T-shaped tube were compared. P-values <.05 were considered significant.We found a significant difference in SHenhance between the data obtained from the spiral flow tube (0.20 ± 0.060) and the T-shaped tube (0.24 ± 0.056) (P = .001). The Eartery values significantly increased by 15% (spiral flow tube, median 14.1 with interquartile range [IQR] 11.8-15.4 vs T-shaped tube, median 12.3 IQR 11.3-14.0, P = .02) using the spiral flow tube.These findings suggest that, by using the Spiral flow tube, the homogeneity of the contrast-enhanced signal intensity in the carotid artery was significantly improved without decreasing the signal intensity in CEMRA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31876747
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018526
pii: 00005792-201912270-00046
pmc: PMC6946492
doi:
Substances chimiques
Contrast Media
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e18526Références
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):529-39
pubmed: 17242265
Stroke. 2009 Nov;40(11):3511-7
pubmed: 19729602
Radiology. 2010 Jul;256(1):32-61
pubmed: 20574084
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Oct;30(4):849-54
pubmed: 19787734
N Engl J Med. 1998 Nov 12;339(20):1415-25
pubmed: 9811916
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):452-8
pubmed: 23208313
Stroke. 2004 Oct;35(10):2306-12
pubmed: 15345798
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015 Nov-Dec;39(6):962-8
pubmed: 26248150
Korean J Radiol. 2001 Jan-Mar;2(1):28-36
pubmed: 11752966
Radiology. 2017 May;283(2):429-437
pubmed: 27977329
Clin Radiol. 1996 Jan;51(1):18-21
pubmed: 8549041
Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):204-13
pubmed: 15955853
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Jan;37(1):62-71
pubmed: 12514579
N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 15;325(7):445-53
pubmed: 1852179
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000 May-Jun;24(3):400-6
pubmed: 10864075
Lancet. 1998 May 9;351(9113):1379-87
pubmed: 9593407
Stroke. 1990 Feb;21(2):209-22
pubmed: 2406993