A multivariate analysis with direct additive and inbreeding depression load effects.


Journal

Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Dec 2019
Historique:
received: 08 03 2019
accepted: 17 12 2019
entrez: 28 12 2019
pubmed: 28 12 2019
medline: 17 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Inbreeding is caused by mating between related individuals and its most common consequence is inbreeding depression. Several studies have detected heterogeneity in inbreeding depression among founder individuals, and recently a procedure for predicting hidden inbreeding depression loads associated with founders and the Mendelian sampling of non-founders has been developed. The objectives of our study were to expand this model to predict the inbreeding loads for all individuals in the pedigree and to estimate the covariance between the inbreeding loads and the additive genetic effects for the trait of interest. We tested the proposed approach with simulated data and with two datasets of records on weaning weight from the Spanish Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega beef cattle breeds. The posterior estimates of the variance components with the simulated datasets did not differ significantly from the simulation parameters. In addition, the correlation between the predicted and simulated inbreeding loads were always positive and ranged from 0.27 to 0.82. The beef cattle datasets comprised 35,126 and 75,194 records on weights between 170 and 250 days of age, and pedigrees of 308,836 and 384,434 individual-sire-dam entries for the Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega breeds, respectively. The posterior mean estimates of the variance of inbreeding depression loads were 29,967.8 and 28,222.4 for the Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega breeds, respectively. They were larger than those of the additive variance (695.0 and 439.8 for Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega, respectively), because they should be understood as the variance of the inbreeding depression achieved by a fully inbred (100%) descendant. Therefore, the inbreeding loads have to be rescaled for smaller inbreeding coefficients. In addition, a strong negative correlation (- 0.43 ± 0.10) between additive effects and inbreeding loads was detected in the Pirenaica, but not in the Rubia Gallega breed. The results of the simulation study confirmed the ability of the proposed procedure to predict inbreeding depression loads for all individuals in the populations. Furthermore, the results obtained from the two real datasets confirmed the variability in the inbreeding depression loads in both breeds and suggested a negative correlation of the inbreeding loads with the additive genetic effects in the Pirenaica breed.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Inbreeding is caused by mating between related individuals and its most common consequence is inbreeding depression. Several studies have detected heterogeneity in inbreeding depression among founder individuals, and recently a procedure for predicting hidden inbreeding depression loads associated with founders and the Mendelian sampling of non-founders has been developed. The objectives of our study were to expand this model to predict the inbreeding loads for all individuals in the pedigree and to estimate the covariance between the inbreeding loads and the additive genetic effects for the trait of interest. We tested the proposed approach with simulated data and with two datasets of records on weaning weight from the Spanish Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega beef cattle breeds.
RESULTS RESULTS
The posterior estimates of the variance components with the simulated datasets did not differ significantly from the simulation parameters. In addition, the correlation between the predicted and simulated inbreeding loads were always positive and ranged from 0.27 to 0.82. The beef cattle datasets comprised 35,126 and 75,194 records on weights between 170 and 250 days of age, and pedigrees of 308,836 and 384,434 individual-sire-dam entries for the Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega breeds, respectively. The posterior mean estimates of the variance of inbreeding depression loads were 29,967.8 and 28,222.4 for the Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega breeds, respectively. They were larger than those of the additive variance (695.0 and 439.8 for Pirenaica and Rubia Gallega, respectively), because they should be understood as the variance of the inbreeding depression achieved by a fully inbred (100%) descendant. Therefore, the inbreeding loads have to be rescaled for smaller inbreeding coefficients. In addition, a strong negative correlation (- 0.43 ± 0.10) between additive effects and inbreeding loads was detected in the Pirenaica, but not in the Rubia Gallega breed.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The results of the simulation study confirmed the ability of the proposed procedure to predict inbreeding depression loads for all individuals in the populations. Furthermore, the results obtained from the two real datasets confirmed the variability in the inbreeding depression loads in both breeds and suggested a negative correlation of the inbreeding loads with the additive genetic effects in the Pirenaica breed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31878872
doi: 10.1186/s12711-019-0521-3
pii: 10.1186/s12711-019-0521-3
pmc: PMC6933709
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

78

Références

J Anim Sci. 1997 Apr;75(4):934-40
pubmed: 9110204
Genetics. 2005 Jul;170(3):1373-84
pubmed: 15911591
Anim Genet. 2014 Oct;45(5):618-28
pubmed: 24975026
Heredity (Edinb). 2018 Jul;121(1):38-51
pubmed: 29434337
Genet Res. 2000 Jun;75(3):331-43
pubmed: 10893869
J Hered. 2011 Mar-Apr;102(2):157-64
pubmed: 21148283
Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):424-7
pubmed: 21333536
J Dairy Sci. 2017 Jun;100(6):4721-4730
pubmed: 28434751
Genet Sel Evol. 2009 Jan 21;41:16
pubmed: 19284688
J Anim Breed Genet. 2018 Feb;135(1):37-44
pubmed: 29230876
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Nov 8;6(11):3593-3601
pubmed: 27605515
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 17;10(12):e0145111
pubmed: 26679703
Nat Rev Genet. 2009 Nov;10(11):783-96
pubmed: 19834483
Science. 2011 Sep 2;333(6047):1220
pubmed: 21885757
Science. 2010 May 14;328(5980):892-4
pubmed: 20466931
Trends Ecol Evol. 2016 Dec;31(12):940-952
pubmed: 27743611
Evolution. 2007 May;61(5):1043-51
pubmed: 17492959
Genet Sel Evol. 2015 Jan 17;47:1
pubmed: 25595431
Genet Res (Camb). 2008 Dec;90(6):499-508
pubmed: 19123968
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Oct 22;266(1433):2061-6
pubmed: 10902542
J Anim Sci. 2017 Sep;95(9):3809-3821
pubmed: 28992001
Genet Sel Evol. 2008 Sep-Oct;40(5):511-27
pubmed: 18694547
Evolution. 1996 Dec;50(6):2187-2200
pubmed: 28565659
J Anim Breed Genet. 2015 Apr;132(2):89-99
pubmed: 25823835
J Anim Breed Genet. 2016 Dec;133(6):523-533
pubmed: 27194586
Heredity (Edinb). 2007 Mar;98(3):172-82
pubmed: 17180167
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 18;8(1):6167
pubmed: 29670190
Evolution. 2002 Dec;56(12):2347-58
pubmed: 12583575
J Anim Sci. 2009 Jan;87(1):72-9
pubmed: 18791149
Genet Sel Evol. 2014 Nov 18;46:71
pubmed: 25407532

Auteurs

Luis Varona (L)

Departamento de Anatomía Embriología y Genética Animal, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013, Saragossa, Spain. lvarona@unizar.es.

Juan Altarriba (J)

Departamento de Anatomía Embriología y Genética Animal, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013, Saragossa, Spain.

Carlos Moreno (C)

Departamento de Anatomía Embriología y Genética Animal, Instituto Agroalimentario de Aragón (IA2), Universidad de Zaragoza, 50013, Saragossa, Spain.

María Martínez-Castillero (M)

Dipartimento di Agronomia Animali, Alimenti Risorce Naturali e Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Padova, 35122, Padua, Italy.

Joaquim Casellas (J)

Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH