Effect of local zoledronic acid administration in a rat model of posterolateral spinal fusion.
Bisphosphonate
Bone autograft
Rats
Spinal fusion
Zoledronic acid
Journal
Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
13
07
2019
accepted:
12
08
2019
entrez:
28
12
2019
pubmed:
28
12
2019
medline:
28
12
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Randomized animal model study. Posterolateral spinal fusion represents a common surgical procedure in the United States. The effect of bisphosphonate administration in these patients is poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to determine whether local administration of bisphosphonate by soaking bone autograft would affect the apparent bone density or structural properties of the fusion mass in a rat model of posterolateral spinal fusion. 36 Spring Dawley rats underwent L4-5 posterolateral spinal fusion with bone autograft. These rats were divided into three groups, two experimental groups and one control group. Each of the experimental groups underwent spinal fusion with morselized vertebral cortical and cancellous autograft soaked in zoledronic acid solution; one group 20 mcg/mL, another 200 mcg/mL. The control group underwent L4-5 spinal fusion with cancellous allograft soaked with saline. At 8 weeks, the rats were euthanized for analysis. Evaluations consisted of micro-CT scanning, four-point bending biomechanical testing, histology, and radiographs. Both of the experimental groups showed statistically significant increase in apparent bone density and bone volume fraction at the fusion mass. Biomechanical measures revealed a trend for improvement in the experimental groups, but these did not reach statistical significance. This data suggest that locally administered bisphosphonate medications result in increased apparent bone density and bone volume fraction at the fusion mass in posterolateral spinal fusion, and that there appear to be no deleterious consequences with regards to the stiffness or maximum load to failure of the fusion mass under flexion bending evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31879484
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.08.021
pii: S0972-978X(19)30345-9
pmc: PMC6919377
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
101-105Informations de copyright
© 2019 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Références
Bone. 2013 Aug;55(2):335-46
pubmed: 23643681
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Apr 15;40(8):E458-68
pubmed: 25627287
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005 Dec;441:30-9
pubmed: 16330982
Spine J. 2013 Feb;13(2):190-9
pubmed: 22658879
J Orthop Sci. 2013 Jul;18(4):646-57
pubmed: 23686083
Biomaterials. 2005 Dec;26(34):6941-9
pubmed: 16009417
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):687-94
pubmed: 23813239
Bone. 1998 May;22(5):455-61
pubmed: 9600778
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1224-33
pubmed: 26831478
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Jul;25(7):1468-86
pubmed: 20533309
Eur Spine J. 2007 Apr;16(4):557-62
pubmed: 16967298
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Mar;468(3):867-74
pubmed: 19763718
Biomaterials. 2004 Aug;25(18):4105-15
pubmed: 15046901
Comp Med. 2015 Feb;65(1):46-50
pubmed: 25730756
J Orthop Res. 2015 Sep;33(9):1297-304
pubmed: 26011820