The characteristic of patulous eustachian tube patients diagnosed by the JOS diagnostic criteria.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2019
2019
Historique:
received:
08
08
2019
accepted:
07
12
2019
entrez:
28
12
2019
pubmed:
28
12
2019
medline:
2
4
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective is to describe characteristics of patients diagnosed with patulous Eustachian tube (PET) using the Diagnostic Criteria proposed by Japan Otological Society, and to evaluate the efficiency of objective tests to determine patent Eustachian tube. Retrospective. Tertiary referral center. A retrospective survey of medical records in Sen-En Rifu Hospital identified 78 ears of 56 patients with "Definite PET" diagnosed by the JOS Diagnostic Criteria between January 2017 and December 2017. Initial diagnosis, aural symptoms (voice autophony, aural fullness and breathing autophony), tubal obstruction procedures (posture change and pharyngeal orifice obstruction) and objective findings (tympanic membrane movement, Tubo-Tympano-Aerodynamic Graphy (TTAG) and sonotubometry) were evaluated. In addition, sonotubometry with postural change (Ohta's method), sitting CT and a newly devised PHI-10 score were also examined. Voice autophony, aural fullness, and breathing autophony were observed in 93.6%, 87.2%, 78.2%, respectively. In 91% of the ears, PET symptoms improved by postural change from sitting to the lying / forward-bending position. Synchronous movement of the TM upon respiration was observed in 69.1% of the ears. Positive findings of TTAG were observed in 75.6% of ears. Positive findings of sonotubometry were found in 55.1% of ears. Sonotubometry with postural change (Ohta's method), when the cut-off value of over 10dB was used, was positive in 45.2% of ears. Newly devised PHI-10 score representing severity of subjective symptoms classifying patients into no handicap, mild handicap, moderate handicap and severe handicap were observed in 12.2%, 10.8%, 18.9% and 58.1% of ears, respectively. The evaluation of the extent of patency of the ET by sitting CT indicated completely open, closed-short, and closed-long, in 68.6%, 11.4% and 21.4% of ears, respectively. Compared to the closed group, the completely open group had a significantly higher frequency of positive breathing autophony, positive sonotubometry, and positive Ohta's method. The characteristics of main symptoms and the efficiency of various tests in PET diagnosis were analyzed based on data obtained from "Definite PET" patients diagnosed by the JOS Diagnostic Criteria. The greater the availability of tests to evaluate PET, the greater the opportunities to diagnose "Definite PET". In particular, tests measuring pressure transmission between the nasopharynx and middle ear, such as TM observation and TTAG, are more sensitive than sonotubometry measuring sound transmission.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31881045
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226908
pii: PONE-D-19-22143
pmc: PMC6934284
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0226908Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Front Neurol. 2017 Apr 28;8:177
pubmed: 28503164
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Apr;40(4):e386-e392
pubmed: 30870363
Acta Otolaryngol. 1978 Jul-Aug;86(1-2):93-103
pubmed: 696300
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Apr;45(2):207-214
pubmed: 28734727
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Sep;38(8):1125-1128
pubmed: 28708793
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2019 Aug;46(4):630-635
pubmed: 30287116
Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1977 May 31;215(3-4):317-23
pubmed: 577699
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Aug;37(7):908-13
pubmed: 27273397
Neuroradiology. 2016 Jun;58(6):543-556
pubmed: 26922743
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018 Feb;45(1):1-5
pubmed: 29153260
Laryngoscope. 1964 Feb;74:267-71
pubmed: 14117259
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 8;13(11):e0206946
pubmed: 30408100
Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Oct;124(8):918-23
pubmed: 15513527
Otol Neurotol. 2015 Mar;36(3):448-52
pubmed: 25356764
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):668-77
pubmed: 17534202
Otol Neurotol. 2007 Feb;28(2):199-203
pubmed: 17255887
Laryngoscope. 1981 Sep;91(9 Pt 1):1427-35
pubmed: 7346684
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jun;38(5):708-713
pubmed: 28306653
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jul;38(6):846-852
pubmed: 28437362
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jun;264(6):601-5
pubmed: 17256122
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Mar;137(3):253-258
pubmed: 27666086
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Jun 15;46(1):47
pubmed: 28619119
Otol Neurotol. 2017 Oct;38(9):1362-1369
pubmed: 28796094
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2009;71(6):312-6
pubmed: 20016242
Laryngoscope. 2017 Sep;127(9):2149-2151
pubmed: 28233914
Clin Otolaryngol. 2015 Aug;40(4):300-11
pubmed: 25851074