Perceptions of isolation during facility births in Haiti - a qualitative study.
Birth experiences
Facility births
Focus groups
Haiti
Journal
Reproductive health
ISSN: 1742-4755
Titre abrégé: Reprod Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101224380
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Dec 2019
27 Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
02
06
2019
accepted:
03
12
2019
entrez:
29
12
2019
pubmed:
29
12
2019
medline:
7
5
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Haiti's maternal mortality, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality rates are the highest in Latin America and the Caribbean. Despite inherent risks, the majority of women still deliver at home without supervision from a skilled birth attendant. The purpose of this study was to elucidate factors driving this decision. We conducted six focus group discussions with women living in urban (N = 14) or rural (N = 17) areas and asked them questions pertaining to their reasons for delivering at a facility or at home, perceptions of staff at the health facility, experiences with or knowledge of facility or home deliveries, and prior pregnancy experiences (if relevant). We also included currently pregnant women to learn about their plans for delivery, if any. All of the women interviewed acknowledged similar perceived benefits of a facility birth, which were a reduced risk of complications during pregnancy and access to emergency care. However, many women also reported unfavorable birthing experiences at facilities. We identified four key thematic concerns that underpinned women's negative assessments of a facility birth: being left alone, feeling ignored, being subject to physical immobility, and lack of compassionate touch/care. Taken together, these concerns articulated an overarching sense of what we term "isolation," which encompasses feelings of being isolated in the hospital during delivery. Although Haitian women recognized that a facility was a safer place for birthing than the home, an overarching stigma of patient neglect and isolation in facilities was a major determining factor in choosing to deliver at home. The Haitian maternal mortality rate is high and will not be lowered if women continue to feel that they will not receive comfort and compassionate touch/care at a facility compared to their experience of delivering with traditional birth attendants at home. Based on these results, we recommend that all secondary and tertiary facilities offering labor and delivery services develop patient support programs, where women are better supported from admission through the labor and delivery process, including but not limited to improvements in communication, privacy, companionship (if deemed safe), respectful care, attention to pain during vaginal exams, and choice of birth position.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Haiti's maternal mortality, stillbirth, and neonatal mortality rates are the highest in Latin America and the Caribbean. Despite inherent risks, the majority of women still deliver at home without supervision from a skilled birth attendant. The purpose of this study was to elucidate factors driving this decision.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted six focus group discussions with women living in urban (N = 14) or rural (N = 17) areas and asked them questions pertaining to their reasons for delivering at a facility or at home, perceptions of staff at the health facility, experiences with or knowledge of facility or home deliveries, and prior pregnancy experiences (if relevant). We also included currently pregnant women to learn about their plans for delivery, if any.
RESULTS
RESULTS
All of the women interviewed acknowledged similar perceived benefits of a facility birth, which were a reduced risk of complications during pregnancy and access to emergency care. However, many women also reported unfavorable birthing experiences at facilities. We identified four key thematic concerns that underpinned women's negative assessments of a facility birth: being left alone, feeling ignored, being subject to physical immobility, and lack of compassionate touch/care. Taken together, these concerns articulated an overarching sense of what we term "isolation," which encompasses feelings of being isolated in the hospital during delivery.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Although Haitian women recognized that a facility was a safer place for birthing than the home, an overarching stigma of patient neglect and isolation in facilities was a major determining factor in choosing to deliver at home. The Haitian maternal mortality rate is high and will not be lowered if women continue to feel that they will not receive comfort and compassionate touch/care at a facility compared to their experience of delivering with traditional birth attendants at home. Based on these results, we recommend that all secondary and tertiary facilities offering labor and delivery services develop patient support programs, where women are better supported from admission through the labor and delivery process, including but not limited to improvements in communication, privacy, companionship (if deemed safe), respectful care, attention to pain during vaginal exams, and choice of birth position.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31881973
doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0843-1
pii: 10.1186/s12978-019-0843-1
pmc: PMC6935234
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
185Subventions
Organisme : W.K. Kellogg Foundation
ID : P3036151
Références
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Oct;31(4):379-395
pubmed: 25712238
J Health Popul Nutr. 2011 Apr;29(2):81-91
pubmed: 21608417
Soc Sci Med. 1994 Apr;38(8):1091-110
pubmed: 8042057
Reprod Health Matters. 2012 Jun;20(39):93-103
pubmed: 22789086
Bull World Health Organ. 2005 Jun;83(6):409-17
pubmed: 15976891
PLoS Med. 2015 Jun 30;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847
pubmed: 26126110
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Feb 2;17(1):52
pubmed: 28152996
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Jan 16;13:5
pubmed: 23324550
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Jun 27;5(2):244-260
pubmed: 28539502
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 7;18(1):213
pubmed: 29879944
Health Care Women Int. 2006 Oct;27(9):822-38
pubmed: 17060181
Reprod Health. 2019 Jan 23;16(1):7
pubmed: 30674323
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Jul 08;(3):CD006759
pubmed: 19588403
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):531
pubmed: 29986692
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Oct 1;32(8):1146-1152
pubmed: 28541422
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2014 Jul;36(1):1-9
pubmed: 25211671
Reprod Health. 2018 Dec 17;15(1):209
pubmed: 30558618
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 18;3:CD012449
pubmed: 30883666
Reprod Health. 2018 Sep 15;15(1):155
pubmed: 30219070
Lancet. 2014 Sep 13;384(9947):980-1004
pubmed: 24797575
BJOG. 2018 Jul;125(8):932-942
pubmed: 29117644
Matern Child Health J. 2007 Jul;11(4):395-401
pubmed: 17265193
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57
pubmed: 17872937
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 06;7:CD003766
pubmed: 28681500
Matern Child Health J. 2010 Nov;14(6):988-98
pubmed: 19882240
J Glob Health. 2017 Dec;7(2):020509
pubmed: 29423186
Reprod Health. 2017 Nov 13;14(1):148
pubmed: 29132431
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 23;5(6):e11190
pubmed: 20585646
Reprod Health. 2009 Jun 16;6:9
pubmed: 19531235
Cad Saude Publica. 2014 Aug;30 Suppl 1:S1-14
pubmed: 25167174
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):925-933
pubmed: 28383374