Avoidance of Coronary Angiography in High-Risk Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: The ACSIS Registry Findings.
1-Year mortality
Acute coronary syndrome
Coronary angiography
Journal
Cardiovascular revascularization medicine : including molecular interventions
ISSN: 1878-0938
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Revasc Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101238551
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2020
10 2020
Historique:
received:
15
07
2019
revised:
01
12
2019
accepted:
16
12
2019
pubmed:
31
12
2019
medline:
16
7
2021
entrez:
30
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high-risk for recurrent coronary syndromes, heart failure and death. Early coronary intervention combined with medications reduces these risks. The ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS) is conducted over a 2-month period, every 2-3 years. ACSIS includes all patients discharged with a diagnosis of ACS from the 24 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. We compared clinical profiles and 1-year survival between ACS patients who did and did not undergo coronary angiography. We reviewed ACSIS for the period 2002-2013. The prognosis of patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization (N = 2078) was significantly worse than for patients who underwent angiography (N = 9550). Avoidance of angiography was less common in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients than in non-STEMI/unstable angina (NSTEMI/UAP) patients (13% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Among NSTEMI/UAP patients, those who did not undergo angiography were older (mean: 71 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), had higher incidences of diabetes (47% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and renal (55% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and heart failure (35% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) on admission, compared to those who underwent angiography. Even patients that underwent only diagnostic angiography had had a better prognosis than patients who did not undergo angiography. After propensity score matching for the major differences mentioned above, survival was still significantly better for patients who underwent angiography. ACS patients who did not undergo coronary angiography had higher-risk clinical profiles and worse 1-year survival than ACS patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography was independently associated with higher mortality. Data over 10 years were reviewed from a national registry of acute coronary syndrome. Patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization were older and with more comorbidities than patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography remained independently associated with 1-year mortality.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at high-risk for recurrent coronary syndromes, heart failure and death. Early coronary intervention combined with medications reduces these risks. The ACS Israeli Survey (ACSIS) is conducted over a 2-month period, every 2-3 years. ACSIS includes all patients discharged with a diagnosis of ACS from the 24 coronary care units and cardiology departments in Israel. We compared clinical profiles and 1-year survival between ACS patients who did and did not undergo coronary angiography.
METHODS/MATERIALS
We reviewed ACSIS for the period 2002-2013.
RESULTS
The prognosis of patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization (N = 2078) was significantly worse than for patients who underwent angiography (N = 9550). Avoidance of angiography was less common in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients than in non-STEMI/unstable angina (NSTEMI/UAP) patients (13% vs. 22%, p < 0.001). Among NSTEMI/UAP patients, those who did not undergo angiography were older (mean: 71 vs. 64 years, p < 0.001), had higher incidences of diabetes (47% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), and renal (55% vs. 27%, p < 0.001) and heart failure (35% vs. 13%, p < 0.01) on admission, compared to those who underwent angiography. Even patients that underwent only diagnostic angiography had had a better prognosis than patients who did not undergo angiography. After propensity score matching for the major differences mentioned above, survival was still significantly better for patients who underwent angiography.
CONCLUSION
ACS patients who did not undergo coronary angiography had higher-risk clinical profiles and worse 1-year survival than ACS patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography was independently associated with higher mortality.
SUMMARY
Data over 10 years were reviewed from a national registry of acute coronary syndrome. Patients who did not undergo coronary angiography during hospitalization were older and with more comorbidities than patients who underwent angiography. After propensity score matching, the absence of angiography remained independently associated with 1-year mortality.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31883979
pii: S1553-8389(19)30821-8
doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.021
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1230-1236Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest None declared.