Changes in the Linear Relationship between Muscle Contraction Intensity and Muscle Hardness after Rectus Femoris Muscle Strain.


Journal

Case reports in orthopedics
ISSN: 2090-6749
Titre abrégé: Case Rep Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101591806

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 12 12 2018
accepted: 07 11 2019
entrez: 31 12 2019
pubmed: 31 12 2019
medline: 31 12 2019
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Joint torque differences between healthy and rehabilitated legs are often measured as a clinical index of recovery from muscle strain injury. Unfortunately, it should be noted that this is a questionable evaluation measure of the muscle after injury because it is a composite value including related cooperating muscles. Meanwhile, the use of ultrasound elastography for the measurement of individual muscle mechanical properties (i.e., muscle hardness) has recently expanded. The purpose of this study was to examine, using ultrasound elastography, the differences in the linear relationship between muscle contraction intensity and muscle hardness during knee extension in athletes who had recovered from grade II rectus femoris muscle strain injury through comparison of the healthy and rehabilitated legs. Six athletes participated. Rectus femoris muscle hardness, determined during isometric contraction at 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of maximum voluntary contraction, was evaluated using ultrasound strain elastography. The results indicated that for the healthy legs, the strain ratios, as indicated by muscle hardness, decreased linearly (became harder) with contraction intensity, but the strain ratios for the rehabilitated legs decreased nonlinearly. These results show the danger of judging the recovery period using only the difference between healthy and rehabilitated muscle strengths and the importance of evaluating individual muscles.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31885987
doi: 10.1155/2019/7813217
pmc: PMC6925710
doi:

Types de publication

Case Reports

Langues

eng

Pagination

7813217

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2019 Takayuki Inami et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Références

Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 May;117(5):843-852
pubmed: 28290056
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Nov;20(11):2356-62
pubmed: 22773066
Br J Sports Med. 2011 Jul;45(9):709-14
pubmed: 21119022
Am J Sports Med. 2001 May-Jun;29(3):300-3
pubmed: 11394599
Muscle Nerve. 2014 Jul;50(1):103-13
pubmed: 24155045
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Apr-May;32(3):710-9
pubmed: 15090389
Ultrasonics. 2016 Sep;71:127-133
pubmed: 27336792
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Jan;112(1):105-12
pubmed: 21499883
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Jun;39(6):1226-32
pubmed: 21335353

Auteurs

Takayuki Inami (T)

Institute of Physical Education, Keio University, 4-1-1, Hiyoshi, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan.

Takuya Shimizu (T)

Graduate School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, 101, Tokodate, Toyota City, Aichi 470-0348, Japan.

Tomoaki Osuga (T)

Osuga Clinic Orthopaedics, 117, Takegaya, Tokai City, Aichi 477-0032, Japan.

Takaya Narita (T)

Department of Sports Technology, Toin University of Yokohama, 1614 Kurogane-cho, Aoba-ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa 225-8503, Japan.

Norikazu Hirose (N)

Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, 2-7-5, Higashi-Fushimi, Tokyo 202-0021, Japan.

Mitsuyoshi Murayama (M)

Institute of Physical Education, Keio University, 4-1-1, Hiyoshi, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan.

Classifications MeSH