A head-to-head comparison of ixekizumab vs. guselkumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 12-week efficacy, safety and speed of response from a randomized, double-blinded trial.
Journal
The British journal of dermatology
ISSN: 1365-2133
Titre abrégé: Br J Dermatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0004041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2020
06 2020
Historique:
accepted:
27
12
2019
pubmed:
31
12
2019
medline:
15
5
2021
entrez:
31
12
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with psoriasis value rapid and complete skin clearance. No head-to-head studies have focused on early responses to interleukin (IL)-17 vs. IL-23 inhibitors. To compare early and complete skin clearance by the IL-17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab. IXORA-R, a 24-week, randomized, double-blinded study, enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [static Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (sPGA) score of ≥ 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 12, and ≥ 10% body surface area]. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive the approved dose of subcutaneous ixekizumab or guselkumab. Primary end point was 100% improvement in PASI (PASI 100) at week 12. Major secondary end points included other levels of improved PASI and sPGA at different time points. Comparisons were made using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with a multiple testing strategy. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. After the completion of the study, the final secondary end point (PASI 100 at 24 weeks) and safety data through week 24 will be reported. In total, 1027 patients were randomized. The primary end point PASI 100 at week 12 was met [215/520 ixekizumab (41%); 126/507 guselkumab (25%); P < 0·001]. All major secondary end points measured up to week 12 were met, including PASI 50 at week 1 and PASI 75 at week 2. Serious adverse event frequency was 3% for each group; no new safety signals were identified. Ixekizumab was superior to guselkumab for rapidly improving signs and symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by week 12. Adverse events were similar to previous ixekizumab and guselkumab studies. Compared with the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab, ixekizumab can offer complete skin clearance more rapidly to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? Patients with plaque psoriasis desire both high levels of clearance and rapid onset of treatment effects. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, has demonstrated greater and faster skin clearance than etanercept and ustekinumab, with consistent long-term efficacy, safety and durability of response. Clinical trial data and systematic reviews have suggested that IL-17 inhibitors can improve a patient's psoriasis more rapidly than IL-23 inhibitors. What does this study add? The head-to-head study design directly compares the efficacy and speed of response of ixekizumab and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The primary end point was met, showing superiority of ixekizumab over guselkumab for achieving complete skin clearance at week 12. The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies. Ixekizumab can deliver patients complete skin clearance and improved quality of life more rapidly than guselkumab.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with psoriasis value rapid and complete skin clearance. No head-to-head studies have focused on early responses to interleukin (IL)-17 vs. IL-23 inhibitors.
OBJECTIVES
To compare early and complete skin clearance by the IL-17A inhibitor ixekizumab vs. the IL-23p19 inhibitor guselkumab.
METHODS
IXORA-R, a 24-week, randomized, double-blinded study, enrolled adults with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis [static Physician's Global Assessment of Disease (sPGA) score of ≥ 3, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) ≥ 12, and ≥ 10% body surface area]. Patients were randomized (1 : 1) to receive the approved dose of subcutaneous ixekizumab or guselkumab. Primary end point was 100% improvement in PASI (PASI 100) at week 12. Major secondary end points included other levels of improved PASI and sPGA at different time points. Comparisons were made using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with a multiple testing strategy. Nonresponder imputation was used for missing data. After the completion of the study, the final secondary end point (PASI 100 at 24 weeks) and safety data through week 24 will be reported.
RESULTS
In total, 1027 patients were randomized. The primary end point PASI 100 at week 12 was met [215/520 ixekizumab (41%); 126/507 guselkumab (25%); P < 0·001]. All major secondary end points measured up to week 12 were met, including PASI 50 at week 1 and PASI 75 at week 2. Serious adverse event frequency was 3% for each group; no new safety signals were identified.
CONCLUSIONS
Ixekizumab was superior to guselkumab for rapidly improving signs and symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis by week 12. Adverse events were similar to previous ixekizumab and guselkumab studies. Compared with the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab, ixekizumab can offer complete skin clearance more rapidly to patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. What's already known about this topic? Patients with plaque psoriasis desire both high levels of clearance and rapid onset of treatment effects. Ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin (IL)-17A, has demonstrated greater and faster skin clearance than etanercept and ustekinumab, with consistent long-term efficacy, safety and durability of response. Clinical trial data and systematic reviews have suggested that IL-17 inhibitors can improve a patient's psoriasis more rapidly than IL-23 inhibitors. What does this study add? The head-to-head study design directly compares the efficacy and speed of response of ixekizumab and the IL-23 inhibitor guselkumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The primary end point was met, showing superiority of ixekizumab over guselkumab for achieving complete skin clearance at week 12. The safety profile of ixekizumab was consistent with previous studies. Ixekizumab can deliver patients complete skin clearance and improved quality of life more rapidly than guselkumab.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31887225
doi: 10.1111/bjd.18851
pmc: PMC7317420
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized
0
guselkumab
089658A12D
ixekizumab
BTY153760O
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1348-1358Subventions
Organisme : Eli Lilly and Company
Pays : International
Investigateurs
Ronald Vender
(R)
Mark A Lomaga
(MA)
Isabelle Delorme
(I)
Chih-Ho Hong
(CH)
Richard L Langley
(RL)
Lorne Albrecht
(L)
Lyn Guenther
(L)
Catherine Maari
(C)
Kim Papp
(K)
Kamal K Singh Ohson
(KK)
Kirk Barber
(K)
Charles Lynde
(C)
Aditya Gupta
(A)
Leslie Rosoph
(L)
Jean-Sébastien Gauthier
(JS)
Melinda Gooderham
(M)
Norman Wasel
(N)
Mani Raman
(M)
Marni Wiseman
(M)
David Greenstein
(D)
Abel Jarell
(A)
Charles Moon
(C)
Lani Clark
(L)
Sadra Sasha Jazayeri
(SS)
Michael Bukhalo
(M)
Angela Moore
(A)
Tiffani K Hamilton
(TK)
Aron Gewirtzman
(A)
Lydie Hazan
(L)
Jeffrey Crowley
(J)
Craig Teller
(C)
Matthew Zirwas
(M)
Stacy R Smith
(SR)
M Christine Lee
(M)
Stephen Tyring
(S)
Patricia Lee
(P)
Sunil Dhawan
(S)
Craig Leonardi
(C)
Amarilis Perez-De Jesus
(AP)
Wendy McFalda
(W)
Ellen Frankel
(E)
Paul Yamauchi
(P)
Scott Fretzin
(S)
Rocco Serrao
(R)
Todd Schlesinger
(T)
Scott Gottlieb
(S)
Peter Jenkin
(P)
Rola Gharib
(R)
Steven Davis
(S)
Navid Nami
(N)
Zoe Diana Draelos
(ZD)
Lloyd Godwin
(L)
Cindy Owen
(C)
Megan Landis
(M)
William Abramovits
(W)
Samuel Sanchez-Rivera
(S)
Abby Van Voorhees
(A)
David Fivenson
(D)
Francisco Kerdel
(F)
Seth B Forman
(SB)
Jeffrey Weinberg
(J)
Jose Gonzalez-Chavez
(J)
Brent Boyce
(B)
Linda Stein-Gold
(L)
Charles Hudson
(C)
Constance Brown
(C)
James Coggi
(J)
Christina Feser
(C)
Rion Forconi
(R)
Sandra Johnson
(S)
Mark McCune
(M)
Lawrence Green
(L)
Vandana Madkan
(V)
Dana Maxwell Shipp
(DM)
Kenneth Gordon
(K)
Jill Waibel
(J)
Oscar Soto-Raices
(O)
Jennifer Cather
(J)
Scott Miller
(S)
John Scott
(J)
Douglas Young
(D)
Jessica Kaffenberger
(J)
Kelley Yokum
(K)
Matthew Zook
(M)
Andrew Blauvelt
(A)
Artis Truett
(A)
George Schmieder
(G)
Gary McCracken
(G)
Patrick McElgunn
(P)
James Herrmann
(J)
Jeffery M Suchniak
(JM)
James Appel
(J)
Elizabeth Barranco
(E)
Mark Lee
(M)
Jerry Bagel
(J)
Lawrence Osman
(L)
Ashley Cauthen
(A)
Neil Sadick
(N)
Eneida De La Torre
(E)
Kelly Taylor
(K)
David Cohen
(D)
Holly Hake Harris
(HH)
Jennifer Soung
(J)
Vassilios Dimitropoulos
(V)
Stephen Miller
(S)
Cathy Barnes
(C)
Rawan Jumean-Haddad
(R)
Suzanne Bruce
(S)
Lawrence Cheung
(L)
Scott Guenthner
(S)
Anthony Gaspari
(A)
Vivian Laquer
(V)
James M Krell
(JM)
Shahram Jacobs
(S)
Walter Nahm
(W)
Neil Korman
(N)
Boni Elewski
(B)
Laura Ferris
(L)
Kristina Callis Duffin
(KC)
David Pariser
(D)
Brian Johnson
(B)
Paul Wallace
(P)
Jeffrey Travers
(J)
Richard Fried
(R)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2019 The Authors. British Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Association of Dermatologists.
Références
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014 May;70(5):871-81.e1-30
pubmed: 24576585
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Feb;10(1):133-150
pubmed: 31749092
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Feb;34(2):301-309
pubmed: 31479549
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017 Sep;7(3):281-292
pubmed: 28639011
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Sep;31(9):1483-1490
pubmed: 28294430
Arch Dermatol Res. 2016 Mar;308(2):69-78
pubmed: 26688112
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):345-56
pubmed: 27299809
J Invest Dermatol. 2005 Oct;125(4):659-64
pubmed: 16185263
Dermatol Clin. 2019 Jan;37(1):29-36
pubmed: 30466686
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Jul 06;7:62
pubmed: 19580674
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Aug 21;12:1483-1503
pubmed: 30174415
Br J Dermatol. 2011 May;164 Suppl 1:1-14
pubmed: 21477010
Lancet. 2015 Aug 8;386(9993):541-51
pubmed: 26072109
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2020 Feb;10(1):73-86
pubmed: 31686337
J Dermatolog Treat. 2016;27(3):224-7
pubmed: 26447179
Lancet. 2019 Sep 7;394(10201):831-839
pubmed: 31402114
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jul;75(1):77-82.e7
pubmed: 27206759
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Dec;9(4):785-797
pubmed: 31630336
Lancet. 2015 Sep 5;386(9997):983-94
pubmed: 26025581
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017 Mar;76(3):405-417
pubmed: 28057360
Br J Dermatol. 2017 Oct;177(4):1014-1023
pubmed: 28542874
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Feb;33(2):333-339
pubmed: 30198588
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008 Jul;22(7):822-6
pubmed: 18422545
J Dermatolog Treat. 2015 Jun;26(3):235-9
pubmed: 25078334
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Apr;29(4):645-8
pubmed: 25370811
J Dermatolog Treat. 2017 May;28(3):188-199
pubmed: 27569650
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jan;34(1):39-46
pubmed: 31465593
Arch Dermatol. 2007 Sep;143(9):1175-9
pubmed: 17875880