Development of a subcutaneous ear implant to deliver an anaplasmosis vaccine to dairy steers.
Anaplasma marginale
Bos taurus
anaplasmosis
cattle
implant
vaccine
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 06 2020
01 06 2020
Historique:
received:
02
10
2019
accepted:
30
12
2019
pubmed:
1
1
2020
medline:
31
10
2020
entrez:
1
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bovine anaplasmosis is the most prevalent tick-transmitted disease of cattle worldwide and a major obstacle to profitable beef production. Use of chlortetracycline-medicated feed to control active anaplasmosis infections during the vector season has raised concerns about the potential emergence of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria that may pose a risk to human health. Furthermore, the absence of effectiveness data for a commercially available, conditionally licensed anaplasmosis vaccine is a major impediment to implementing anaplasmosis control programs. The primary objective of this study was to develop a single-dose vaccine delivery platform to produce long-lasting protective immunity against anaplasmosis infections. Twelve Holstein steers, aged 11 to 12 wk, were administered a novel 3-stage, single-dose vaccine against Anaplasma marginale, a major surface protein 1a. The vaccine consisted of a soluble vaccine administered subcutaneously (s.c.) for immune priming, a vaccine depot of a biodegradable polyanhydride rod with intermediate slow release of the vaccine for boosting immune response, and an immune-isolated vaccine platform for extended antigen release (VPEAR implant) deposited s.c. in the ear. Six calves were randomly assigned to 2 vaccine constructs (n = 3) that featured rods and implants containing a combination of 2 different adjuvants, diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-Dextran and Quil-A (Group A). The remaining 6 calves were randomly assigned to 2 vaccine constructs (n = 3) that featured rods and implants containing the same adjuvant (either DEAE-Dextran or Quil A) (Group B). Twenty-one months post-implantation, calves were challenged intravenously with A. marginale stabilate and were monitored weekly for signs of fever, decreased packed cell volume (PCV) and bacteremia. Data were analyzed using a mixed-effects model and chi-squared tests (SAS v9.04.01, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Calves in Group A had higher PCV than calves in Group B (P = 0.006) at day 35 post-infection. Calves in Group A were less likely to require antibiotic intervention compared with calves in Group B (P = 0.014). Results indicate that calves exhibited diminished clinical signs of anaplasmosis when antigen was delivered with a combination of adjuvants as opposed to a single adjuvant. This demonstrates the feasibility of providing long-lasting protection against clinical bovine anaplasmosis infections using a subcutaneous ear implant vaccine construct.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31889177
pii: 5691273
doi: 10.1093/jas/skz392
pmc: PMC7271671
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Bacterial Vaccines
0
Delayed-Action Preparations
0
Drug Implants
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
Références
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1983 Jul 1;183(1):63-5
pubmed: 6874524
Vet Microbiol. 2008 Aug 25;130(3-4):277-84
pubmed: 18387757
Am J Vet Res. 2010 Oct;71(10):1178-88
pubmed: 20919904
Vaccine. 2004 Jan 2;22(3-4):407-15
pubmed: 14670322
Infect Genet Evol. 2014 Dec;28:596-615
pubmed: 24727644
Vet Microbiol. 2010 Sep 28;145(1-2):69-75
pubmed: 20346598
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015 Apr;6(3):205-10
pubmed: 25802034
J Anim Sci. 2012 May;90(5):1479-88
pubmed: 22147471
Vet Parasitol. 1995 Mar;57(1-3):19-41
pubmed: 7597784
Int J Parasitol. 1987 Oct;17(7):1279-85
pubmed: 2448258
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2003 Oct;16(4):698-712
pubmed: 14557295
Vaccine. 2018 Feb 8;36(7):1016-1023
pubmed: 29413092
Vet Parasitol. 2001 Dec 3;102(1-2):151-61
pubmed: 11705661
J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Feb;39(2):631-5
pubmed: 11158120
Infect Immun. 2001 Nov;69(11):6853-62
pubmed: 11598059
J Clin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;41(4):1609-16
pubmed: 12682152
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2011 Feb;58(1):1-30
pubmed: 21040509
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 21;8(10):e78357
pubmed: 24205209
Vet Microbiol. 2003 Feb 2;91(2-3):265-83
pubmed: 12458174
BMC Genomics. 2016 Jun 03;17:422
pubmed: 27260942
Science. 1986 Mar 14;231(4743):1299-302
pubmed: 3945825
Am J Vet Res. 1985 Mar;46(3):570-2
pubmed: 3994125
Vaccine. 2013 Aug 2;31(35):3617-22
pubmed: 23664994
Immunol Cell Biol. 2009 Jul;87(5):371-6
pubmed: 19381160
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 08;8(4):e60311
pubmed: 23579784
Aust Vet J. 1988 Sep;65(9):285-7
pubmed: 2847702
Vet Parasitol. 2000 Feb 1;87(4):301-13
pubmed: 10669100
Vaccine. 2003 May 16;21(17-18):1874-83
pubmed: 12706672
Am J Vet Res. 1972 Dec;33(12):2557-60
pubmed: 4641213
Vet Parasitol. 2005 Jan 4;127(1):61-73
pubmed: 15675047