Arboreal route navigation in a Neotropical mammal: energetic implications associated with tree monitoring and landscape attributes.

Black howler monkey (Alouatta pigra) Cognitive load Landscape Navigation Route selection Route-based spatial map Topological cognitive map

Journal

Movement ecology
ISSN: 2051-3933
Titre abrégé: Mov Ecol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101635009

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 18 09 2019
accepted: 05 12 2019
entrez: 1 1 2020
pubmed: 1 1 2020
medline: 1 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although navigating along a network of routes might constrain animal movement flexibility, it may be an energetically efficient strategy. Routinely using the same route allows for visually monitoring of food resources, which might reduce the cognitive load and as such facilitate the process of movement decision-making. Similarly, locating routes in areas that avoid costly landscape attributes will enhance their overall energy balance. In this study we determined the benefits of route navigation in an energy minimiser arboreal primate, the black howler monkey ( We monitored five neighbouring groups of black howler monkeys at Palenque National Park, Mexico from September 2016 through August 2017. We recorded the location of the focal group every 20 m and mapped all travel paths to establish a route network ( The number of food trees that fell within the visual detection distance from the route network was higher (mean: 156.1 ± SD 44.9) than randomly simulated locations (mean: 121.9 ± SD 46.4). Similarly, the number of food trees found within the monkey's visual range per meter travelled increased, on overage, 0.35 ± SE 0.04 trees/m with increasing use of the route. In addition, route segments used at least twice were more likely to occur with increasing density of food resources and decreasing presence of canopy gaps. Route segments used at least four times were more likely to occur in elevated areas within the home ranges but only under conditions of reduced visual access to food resources. Route navigation emerged as an efficient movement strategy in a group-living arboreal primate. Highly used route segments potentially increased visual access to food resources while avoiding energetically costly landscape features securing foraging success in a tropical rainforest.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Although navigating along a network of routes might constrain animal movement flexibility, it may be an energetically efficient strategy. Routinely using the same route allows for visually monitoring of food resources, which might reduce the cognitive load and as such facilitate the process of movement decision-making. Similarly, locating routes in areas that avoid costly landscape attributes will enhance their overall energy balance. In this study we determined the benefits of route navigation in an energy minimiser arboreal primate, the black howler monkey (
METHODS METHODS
We monitored five neighbouring groups of black howler monkeys at Palenque National Park, Mexico from September 2016 through August 2017. We recorded the location of the focal group every 20 m and mapped all travel paths to establish a route network (
RESULTS RESULTS
The number of food trees that fell within the visual detection distance from the route network was higher (mean: 156.1 ± SD 44.9) than randomly simulated locations (mean: 121.9 ± SD 46.4). Similarly, the number of food trees found within the monkey's visual range per meter travelled increased, on overage, 0.35 ± SE 0.04 trees/m with increasing use of the route. In addition, route segments used at least twice were more likely to occur with increasing density of food resources and decreasing presence of canopy gaps. Route segments used at least four times were more likely to occur in elevated areas within the home ranges but only under conditions of reduced visual access to food resources.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Route navigation emerged as an efficient movement strategy in a group-living arboreal primate. Highly used route segments potentially increased visual access to food resources while avoiding energetically costly landscape features securing foraging success in a tropical rainforest.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31890215
doi: 10.1186/s40462-019-0187-z
pii: 187
pmc: PMC6918719
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

39

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s). 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Aug;7(8):663-78
pubmed: 16858394
J Exp Biol. 2017 Jan 15;220(Pt 2):161-166
pubmed: 27802142
J Theor Biol. 2006 Apr 21;239(4):507-15
pubmed: 16199059
Am J Primatol. 2014 May;76(5):447-59
pubmed: 24038234
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 9;105(49):19052-9
pubmed: 19060196
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 5;371(1685):20150180
pubmed: 26598734
Sci Rep. 2014 Feb 13;4:4024
pubmed: 24526001
Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):357-67
pubmed: 17393193
Am J Primatol. 2014 Jun;76(6):586-95
pubmed: 24375420
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 May 19;373(1746):
pubmed: 29581394
Psychol Rev. 1993 Apr;100(2):163-82
pubmed: 8483980
J Exp Biol. 2014 Jan 15;217(Pt 2):169-79
pubmed: 24431141
Science. 2018 Sep 7;361(6406):1023-1025
pubmed: 30190405
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):null
pubmed: 24403724
J Exp Biol. 2016 May 15;219(Pt 10):1424-31
pubmed: 27207950
Nature. 2012 Nov 29;491(7426):761-4
pubmed: 23103863
Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):557-60
pubmed: 17148287
Biol Lett. 2007 Jun 22;3(3):253-6
pubmed: 17439848
Am J Primatol. 2014 May;76(5):460-71
pubmed: 24166824
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;13(1):36-43
pubmed: 19058992
Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):317-29
pubmed: 17387530
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112544
pubmed: 25389769
Nat Neurosci. 2013 Feb;16(2):130-8
pubmed: 23354386
Anim Cogn. 2019 Mar;22(2):251-263
pubmed: 30689116
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e26144
pubmed: 22022541
Ecol Lett. 2013 Oct;16(10):1316-29
pubmed: 23953128
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 30;9(1):11066
pubmed: 31363113
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Apr;94(2):483-502
pubmed: 30211971
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jun 17;111(24):8949-54
pubmed: 24889633
Am J Primatol. 2016 Jun;78(6):626-45
pubmed: 26800493
Nat Commun. 2017 Apr 18;8:15049
pubmed: 28416804
J Exp Biol. 1996 Jan;199(Pt 1):219-24
pubmed: 8576693
Sci Adv. 2016 Feb 19;2(2):e1500445
pubmed: 26989769
J Exp Biol. 2019 Feb 6;222(Pt Suppl 1):null
pubmed: 30728233
Curr Biol. 2006 Jul 25;16(14):R527-9
pubmed: 16860724
Am Nat. 2013 Sep;182(3):298-312
pubmed: 23933722
Am J Primatol. 2002 Oct;58(2):45-55
pubmed: 12386913
J Hum Evol. 2017 Feb;103:45-52
pubmed: 28166907
J Anim Ecol. 2015 Jul;84(4):1059-70
pubmed: 25714592
Anim Cogn. 2012 Jan;15(1):83-96
pubmed: 21779883

Auteurs

Miguel de Guinea (M)

1Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gibbs Building, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP UK.

Alejandro Estrada (A)

2Institute of Biology, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.

K Anne-Isola Nekaris (KA)

1Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Gibbs Building, Gipsy Lane, Oxford, OX3 0BP UK.

Sarie Van Belle (S)

3Department of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX USA.

Classifications MeSH