Intervention planning and modification of the BUMP intervention: a digital intervention for the early detection of raised blood pressure in pregnancy.

Digital intervention Hypertension Intervention planning Person-based approach Pre-eclampsia Pregnancy

Journal

Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 12 03 2019
accepted: 28 11 2019
entrez: 1 1 2020
pubmed: 1 1 2020
medline: 1 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, particularly pre-eclampsia, pose a substantial health risk for both maternal and foetal outcomes. The BUMP (Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring in Pregnancy) interventions are being tested in a trial. They aim to facilitate the early detection of raised blood pressure through self-monitoring. This article outlines how the self-monitoring interventions in the BUMP trial were developed and modified using the person-based approach to promote engagement and adherence. Key behavioural challenges associated with blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy were identified through synthesising qualitative pilot data and existing evidence, which informed guiding principles for the development process. Social cognitive theory was identified as an appropriate theoretical framework. A testable logic model was developed to illustrate the hypothesised processes of change associated with the intervention. Iterative qualitative feedback from women and staff informed modifications to the participant materials. The evidence synthesis suggested women face challenges integrating self-monitoring into their lives and that adherence is challenging at certain time points in pregnancy (for example, starting maternity leave). Intervention modification included strategies to address adherence but also focussed on modifying outcome expectancies, by providing messages explaining pre-eclampsia and outlining the potential benefits of self-monitoring. With an in-depth understanding of the target population, several methods and approaches to plan and develop interventions specifically relevant to pregnant women were successfully integrated, to address barriers to behaviour change while ensuring they are easy to engage with, persuasive and acceptable.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, particularly pre-eclampsia, pose a substantial health risk for both maternal and foetal outcomes. The BUMP (Blood Pressure Self-Monitoring in Pregnancy) interventions are being tested in a trial. They aim to facilitate the early detection of raised blood pressure through self-monitoring. This article outlines how the self-monitoring interventions in the BUMP trial were developed and modified using the person-based approach to promote engagement and adherence.
METHODS METHODS
Key behavioural challenges associated with blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy were identified through synthesising qualitative pilot data and existing evidence, which informed guiding principles for the development process. Social cognitive theory was identified as an appropriate theoretical framework. A testable logic model was developed to illustrate the hypothesised processes of change associated with the intervention. Iterative qualitative feedback from women and staff informed modifications to the participant materials.
RESULTS RESULTS
The evidence synthesis suggested women face challenges integrating self-monitoring into their lives and that adherence is challenging at certain time points in pregnancy (for example, starting maternity leave). Intervention modification included strategies to address adherence but also focussed on modifying outcome expectancies, by providing messages explaining pre-eclampsia and outlining the potential benefits of self-monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
With an in-depth understanding of the target population, several methods and approaches to plan and develop interventions specifically relevant to pregnant women were successfully integrated, to address barriers to behaviour change while ensuring they are easy to engage with, persuasive and acceptable.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31890265
doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0537-z
pii: 537
pmc: PMC6925434
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

153

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR-RP-02-12-015
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-2014-05-019
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : RP-PG-0614-20005
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s). 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsRM has received blood pressure monitoring equipment for research studies from Omron and Lloyds Pharmacy. No other author has a conflict.

Références

J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(5):745-51
pubmed: 25731656
Matern Child Health J. 2011 May;15(4):514-9
pubmed: 20213490
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
BMJ Open. 2015 Oct 22;5(10):e008871
pubmed: 26493459
Implement Sci. 2009 Jul 16;4:40
pubmed: 19607700
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2004 Sep-Dec;25(3-4):183-7
pubmed: 15715017
Int J Telemed Appl. 2013;2013:782074
pubmed: 24454354
Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95
pubmed: 23512568
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Jun;24(2):246-8
pubmed: 22560188
Healthc Inform Res. 2016 Apr;22(2):73-80
pubmed: 27200216
J Hypertens. 2016 Apr;34(4):600-12
pubmed: 26845284
Inform Prim Care. 2012;20(1):57-67
pubmed: 23336836
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015 Oct 26;1:37
pubmed: 27965815
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2012;5:97-103
pubmed: 22915948
Br J Gen Pract. 2012 Feb;62(595):e135-42
pubmed: 22520791
Midwifery. 2014 Dec;30(12):1187-95
pubmed: 24917032
Lancet. 2002 Jun 1;359(9321):1877-90
pubmed: 12057549
BMC Fam Pract. 2011 Dec 30;12:143
pubmed: 22208768
Birth. 2010 Sep;37(3):202-10
pubmed: 20887536
Matern Child Health J. 2014 Apr;18(3):729-36
pubmed: 23775251
Hypertens Pregnancy. 2013;32(1):60-73
pubmed: 22957520
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 May;20(5):649-51
pubmed: 21438700
J Hum Hypertens. 2016 Feb;30(2):141-6
pubmed: 25903164
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Apr;64(621):e223-32
pubmed: 24686887
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 19;17(1):427
pubmed: 29258469
Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 May;50(5):587-92
pubmed: 23159157
Can J Cardiol. 2007 May 15;23(7):591-4
pubmed: 17534469
Semin Perinatol. 2009 Jun;33(3):130-7
pubmed: 19464502
BMJ Open. 2013 May 28;3(5):
pubmed: 23793649
Hypertension. 2011 Jan;57(1):29-38
pubmed: 21115879
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jan 30;17(1):e30
pubmed: 25639757
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 23;12(1):25
pubmed: 28231840
J Health Commun. 2015;20(10):1115-24
pubmed: 26132887
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1180-5
pubmed: 17518893
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 23;10(1):e034593
pubmed: 31980512
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Sep-Oct;36(5):419-29
pubmed: 17880312
Midwifery. 2011 Dec;27(6):e182-7
pubmed: 20851509
J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:303-11
pubmed: 23030578
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011 Dec;45(6):1285-92
pubmed: 22241183
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074
pubmed: 16581405
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Apr;99(4):578-582
pubmed: 26610389
BMJ. 2014 Nov 18;349:g6616
pubmed: 25406132
J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Mar;30(1):65-72
pubmed: 19308785
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Dec 28;17(1):442
pubmed: 29284456
Health Care Women Int. 2009 Nov;30(11):971-88
pubmed: 19809901

Auteurs

Rebecca Band (R)

1Academic unit of psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.

Lisa Hinton (L)

2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.

Katherine L Tucker (KL)

2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.

Lucy C Chappell (LC)

3Division of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH UK.

Carole Crawford (C)

2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.

Marloes Franssen (M)

2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.

Sheila Greenfield (S)

4Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK.

James Hodgkinson (J)

4Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT UK.

Christine McCourt (C)

5Centre for Maternal and Child Health, School of Health Sciences, City University, London, EC1R IUW UK.

Richard J McManus (RJ)

2Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Infirmary Quarter University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG UK.

Jane Sandall (J)

3Division of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, SE1 7EH UK.

Mauro Dala Santos (MD)

6Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK.

Carmelo Velardo (C)

6Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7DQ UK.

Lucy Yardley (L)

1Academic unit of psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK.
7School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Classifications MeSH