Interprofessional simulation in a student community clinic: insights from an educational framework and contact theory.


Journal

Advances in simulation (London, England)
ISSN: 2059-0628
Titre abrégé: Adv Simul (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101700425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2019
Historique:
received: 12 06 2019
accepted: 18 06 2019
entrez: 1 1 2020
pubmed: 1 1 2020
medline: 1 1 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Simulation in community care is a relatively understudied area. In this paper, we report a qualitative evaluation of the Simulated Client Interprofessional Education (SCIPE) program in a community clinic for undergraduate health and social care students in a rural setting. We sought to explore the stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of training for, and conduct of, a simulated client-based activity to support the development of collaborative practice of students. We used an educational framework ( Data on Fourteen clinics involved 5 facilitators, 12 simulated clients and 40 students. Fifteen interviews were conducted. The SCIPE program led to perceived improvements in students' communication and awareness of interprofessional collaboration. Participation in the program enabled students to experience a holistic approach to client interviewing and development of competency in collaborative goal setting. Further attention to Although the SCIPE program benefited students, the need for more explicit organisational engagement and support was revealed in interviews. The use of 3P and contact theory was helpful in identifying elements of the program for maintenance and development. Future research could follow students into practice to see if the behaviours are sustained and translated. Strengths included broad stakeholder involvement and immediate feedback. The key limitation was that the activity lacked explicit institutional support, facilitators required further training in briefing and the outcomes largely refer to participants' perceptions and may not translate to practice.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31890317
doi: 10.1186/s41077-019-0106-9
pii: 106
pmc: PMC6923930
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

21

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2019.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Références

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb;18(2):e62-e69
pubmed: 28157808
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):50-63
pubmed: 20078756
Simul Healthc. 2015 Apr;10(2):76-84
pubmed: 25830819
Med Teach. 2017 May;39(5):463-468
pubmed: 28332419
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Oct;21(10):1045-9
pubmed: 16836624
Med Teach. 2016 Jul;38(7):656-68
pubmed: 27146438
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28
pubmed: 16147767
Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):115-25
pubmed: 19088616
BMC Med. 2011 Mar 28;9:29
pubmed: 21443779
J Allied Health. 2017 Spring;46(1):56-61
pubmed: 28255597
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Feb;34(2):259-64
pubmed: 23518067
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;(3):CD002213
pubmed: 23543515
J Health Organ Manag. 2008;22(2):129-46
pubmed: 18700524
Simul Healthc. 2016 Dec;11(6):404-418
pubmed: 27602706
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2018 May/Jun;37(3):144-155
pubmed: 29596291
Simul Healthc. 2007 Summer;2(2):126-35
pubmed: 19088617

Auteurs

Susan Waller (S)

2Department of Rural & Indigenous Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.

Debra Nestel (D)

1Monash Institute for Health and Clinical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Building 13D, Room DG11, 35 Rainforest Walk, Clayton, VIC 3168 Australia.

Classifications MeSH