Study of the Relationship Between Self-Efficacy, General Health and Burnout Among Iranian Health Workers.
burnout
health
self efficacy
Journal
Osong public health and research perspectives
ISSN: 2210-9099
Titre abrégé: Osong Public Health Res Perspect
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101563309
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
entrez:
4
1
2020
pubmed:
4
1
2020
medline:
4
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To evaluate the relationship between self-efficacy, general health and burnout of the staff at Shahroud University of Medical Sciences. In 2015, 249 staff at Shahroud University of Medical Sciences (from a total reference population of 520 staff members) were selected through stratified random sampling. To collect the data, Sherer self-efficacy Scale, General Health Questionnaire and Maslach Burnout Inventory were used. The collected data were analyzed through ANOVA, Pearson correlation and Chi-square tests using SPSS 16. The relationship between self-efficacy, general health and burnout (latent factors) were studied using structural equation modeling with Stata 14. The mean age of participants was 36.97 ± 7.60 years, and the mean number of years work experience was 12.29 ± 7.57. The mean scores of general health, self-efficacy and burnout were 28.24 ± 11.14, 62.30 ± 9.21 and 81.67 ± 22.18, respectively. The results of the study showed a statistically significant relationship between self-efficacy and general health which equals -0.32. A statistically significant relationship also existed between burnout scores and general health scores (beta = 0.78). The results showed that high self-efficacy improves the general health of employees at the Shahroud University of Medical Sciences and reduces burnout. Special attention should be paid to self-efficacy in the prevention of burnout.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31897365
doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2019.10.6.06
pii: ophrp-10-359
pmc: PMC6927415
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
359-367Informations de copyright
Copyright ©2019, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2019 Aug;10(4):221-227
pubmed: 31497493
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422
pubmed: 11148311
Korean J Med Educ. 2015 Mar;27(1):27-35
pubmed: 25800259
J Nurs Adm. 2001 Jun;31(6):324-31
pubmed: 11417172
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 8;11(12):e0167648
pubmed: 27930726
Int J Nurs Pract. 2016 Dec;22(6):538-545
pubmed: 27241867
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0122128
pubmed: 25898257
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug 29;18(1):667
pubmed: 30157926
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:102-7
pubmed: 27429414
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jun 09;10:326
pubmed: 20534136
Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Jun;52(6):1080-9
pubmed: 25801311
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 10;16(2):
pubmed: 30634607
Psicothema. 2010 Nov;22(4):600-5
pubmed: 21044485
Public Health. 2015 May;129(5):525-30
pubmed: 25749670
J Res Health Sci. 2010 Jun 24;10(1):42-6
pubmed: 22911916
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Mar 17;(3):CD003541
pubmed: 20238322