Relation between volume of sphenoid sinuses and protrusion of Vidian nerve: possible applications to Vidian neurectomy.
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anatomic Variation
Clinical Decision-Making
Denervation
/ methods
Facial Neuralgia
/ etiology
Female
Geniculate Ganglion
/ anatomy & histology
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
Male
Middle Aged
Retrospective Studies
Rhinitis
/ etiology
Sphenoid Sinus
/ diagnostic imaging
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
3D segmentation
CT-scan
Pterygoid canal
Sphenoid sinus
Vidian nerve
Journal
Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA
ISSN: 1279-8517
Titre abrégé: Surg Radiol Anat
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8608029
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2020
May 2020
Historique:
received:
17
08
2019
accepted:
23
12
2019
pubmed:
4
1
2020
medline:
22
12
2020
entrez:
4
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vidian neurectomy is a surgical procedure applied to different pathological conditions, including chronic rhinitis and sphenopalatine neuralgia. The choice of the correct surgical approach depends upon the possible protrusion of Vidian nerve into the sphenoid sinuses. The present study analyzes the possible relationship between protrusion of Vidian nerve and volume of sphenoid sinuses. In total, 320 maxillofacial CT-scans were retrospectively assessed. Subjects equally divided among males and females (age range 18-94 years) were divided into three groups according to the profile of Vidian nerve protrusion: type 1: Vidian nerve inside the sphenoid corpus; type 2: partially protruding into the sphenoid sinus; and type 3: entirely protruding into the sphenoid sinus through a stalk. Volume of sphenoid sinuses was extracted through the ITK-SNAP-free software and automatically calculated. Possible statistically significant differences in prevalence of the three types between males and females were assessed through Chi-squared test (p < 0.05). Differences in volume of sphenoid sinuses in subjects included within the three types were assessed through one-way ANOVA test (p < 0.05), separately for males and females. Type 2 was the most prevalent (46.5%), followed by type 1 (38.8%) and type 3 (14.7%), without significant differences according to sex (p > 0.05). Volume significantly increased passing from type 1 to type 3 both in males (p < 0.01) and in females (p < 0.01). The results prove the existence of a strict relationship between sphenoid sinuses pneumatization and protrusion of the Vidian canal and give a contribution to the knowledge of this important anatomical variant in endoscopic surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31897657
doi: 10.1007/s00276-019-02408-3
pii: 10.1007/s00276-019-02408-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
583-587Références
Arch Otolaryngol. 1978 Oct;104(10):585-7
pubmed: 697636
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2015;55(1):71-6
pubmed: 25744352
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Apr 5;132(7):798-804
pubmed: 30897594
J Neuroradiol. 2003 Sep;30(4):196-200
pubmed: 14566186
Brain Res. 1975 Sep 23;95(2-3):403-6
pubmed: 168941
Surg Radiol Anat. 2018 Feb;40(2):193-198
pubmed: 29270712
Headache. 2019 Mar;59(3):358-370
pubmed: 30635915
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;276(5):1373-1383
pubmed: 30747319
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e1011-e1016
pubmed: 30218796
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Jul - Aug;83(4):381-387
pubmed: 27283380
B-ENT. 2013;9(2):117-21
pubmed: 23909118
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Dec;32(9):2097-2104
pubmed: 28975430
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Sep-Oct;25(5):346-50
pubmed: 22186250
Ann Anat. 2016 Jan;203:69-76
pubmed: 25843780
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;268(6):851-6
pubmed: 21221616
Surg Radiol Anat. 2011 Oct;33(8):697-702
pubmed: 21445687
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Jan;35(1):47-9
pubmed: 16421265
Rhinology. 2005 Jun;43(2):109-14
pubmed: 16008065
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Mar - Apr;85(2):136-143
pubmed: 29337014
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 Jul;130 Suppl 4:S7-S28
pubmed: 27488341
Am J Rhinol. 2007 Sep-Oct;21(5):644-7
pubmed: 17999806
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Nov-Dec;25(6):e217-20
pubmed: 22185728
Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Jul;36(5):419-27
pubmed: 24146215
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1116-28
pubmed: 16545965
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2015 May;5(5):423-30
pubmed: 25732231
Clin Anat. 2007 Oct;20(7):751-4
pubmed: 17471528