Determining Clinically Based Factors Associated With Reclassification in the Pre-MRI Era using a Large Prospective Active Surveillance Cohort.
Aged
Biopsy
/ statistics & numerical data
Disease Progression
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Progression-Free Survival
Prospective Studies
Prostate
/ pathology
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ diagnosis
Risk Assessment
/ statistics & numerical data
Tumor Burden
Watchful Waiting
/ methods
Journal
Urology
ISSN: 1527-9995
Titre abrégé: Urology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0366151
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2020
04 2020
Historique:
received:
28
08
2019
revised:
05
11
2019
accepted:
12
11
2019
pubmed:
4
1
2020
medline:
13
1
2022
entrez:
4
1
2020
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To report biopsy-related and oncologic outcomes in a large prospective active surveillance cohort that was initiated in the premagnetic resonance imaging era and to additionally identify clinical factors associated with disease reclassification in order to inform future studies designed to improve enrollment and follow-up on active surveillance. Patients were prospectively enrolled at a single institution from 2006 to 2014 and followed until 2016. Men with Gleason 6 or 7 disease were eligible, and those with >6 months follow-up were included in the analysis. Patients were risk stratified based on clinical/pathologic criteria, including based on a combination of baseline and confirmatory biopsy tumor characteristics. Reclassification-free survival, based on tumor volume increase or Gleason score increase, was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Of 825 enrolled patients, 682 met inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 40 months (range 6.6-126.8). Disease was reclassified in 249 (36.5%), and 157 (23.0%) underwent treatment. A single positive core with a negative confirmatory biopsy was significantly associated with time to reclassification (median not met vs 43 months, log rank test P <.001). Composite tumor length, defined as the combined tumor length between baseline and confirmatory biopsies, was associated with shorter Gleason upgrade-free survival (hazard ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.11-1.40, P <.001) in multivariable analysis. Baseline stratification using clinical factors including tumor length may refine risk stratification and offer the foundation on which new systems that incorporate modalities such as magnetic resonance imaging may be based.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31899230
pii: S0090-4295(19)31134-3
doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.041
pmc: PMC7141963
mid: NIHMS1556242
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
91-97Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA016672
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA140388
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Jun;6(3):345-354
pubmed: 28725576
Eur Urol. 2015 Dec;68(6):1083-8
pubmed: 25819722
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):68-76
pubmed: 26059275
BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-958
pubmed: 29679430
J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1330-4; discussion 1334-5
pubmed: 18707731
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):80-2
pubmed: 26151271
N Engl J Med. 2018 May 10;378(19):1767-1777
pubmed: 29552975
Eur Urol. 2015 Apr;67(4):619-26
pubmed: 25457014
JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):390-7
pubmed: 25626035
J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):954-960
pubmed: 29074222
J Urol. 2015 Jun;193(6):1950-5
pubmed: 25572035
J Urol. 2019 Feb;201(2):300-307
pubmed: 30179620
Can Urol Assoc J. 2019 Aug;13(8):250-255
pubmed: 31496491
Eur Urol. 2015 Jan;67(1):44-50
pubmed: 25159890
J Urol. 2000 Jan;163(1):152-7
pubmed: 10604335
Eur Urol. 2019 Feb;75(2):300-309
pubmed: 30017404
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 20;33(30):3379-85
pubmed: 26324359
J Urol. 2007 Sep;178(3 Pt 1):833-7
pubmed: 17631355
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):235-241
pubmed: 31109856
J Urol. 2015 Mar;193(3):807-11
pubmed: 25261803
Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):357-368
pubmed: 29937198
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):462-8
pubmed: 22445138
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2164-8, discussion 2168
pubmed: 16280756
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30
pubmed: 26733552
BJU Int. 2009 Apr;103(7):872-6
pubmed: 18990146