Perceptions of risk and influences of choice in pregnant women with obesity. An evidence synthesis of qualitative research.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2020
Historique:
received: 15 11 2019
accepted: 17 12 2019
entrez: 4 1 2020
pubmed: 4 1 2020
medline: 9 4 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Between 7-35% of the maternity population are obese in high income countries and 1-40% in lower or middle-income countries. Women with obesity are traditionally limited by the choices available to them during pregnancy and birth because of the higher risk of complications. This evidence synthesis set out to summarise how women with obesity's perceptions of pregnancy and birth risk influence the care choices that they make. A search of medical and health databases for qualitative studies written in the English language, published Jan 1993-April 2019 and reporting on pregnant women with obesity's perception of risk and influence of pregnancy and birth choices. Data was extracted by two reviewers onto a questions framework and then analysed using a thematic synthesis technique. Confidence in the qualitative findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual. 23 full texts were included. The common themes on perception of risk were: 'Self-blame arising from others' stereotyped beliefs ', 'Normalisation', 'Lack of preparation', 'Fearful acceptance and inevitability' and 'Baby prioritised over mother'. For influence of choices, the themes were: 'External influences from personal stresses', 'Restrictive guidelines', 'Relationship with healthcare professional' and 'Perception of Risk'. Evidence on what influences women with obesity's pregnancy choices is limited. Further research is needed on the best methods to discuss the risks of pregnancy and birth for women with obesity in a sensitive and acceptable manner and to identify the key influences when women with obesity make choices antenatally and for birth planning.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Between 7-35% of the maternity population are obese in high income countries and 1-40% in lower or middle-income countries. Women with obesity are traditionally limited by the choices available to them during pregnancy and birth because of the higher risk of complications. This evidence synthesis set out to summarise how women with obesity's perceptions of pregnancy and birth risk influence the care choices that they make.
METHODS
A search of medical and health databases for qualitative studies written in the English language, published Jan 1993-April 2019 and reporting on pregnant women with obesity's perception of risk and influence of pregnancy and birth choices. Data was extracted by two reviewers onto a questions framework and then analysed using a thematic synthesis technique. Confidence in the qualitative findings was assessed using GRADE-CERQual.
RESULTS
23 full texts were included. The common themes on perception of risk were: 'Self-blame arising from others' stereotyped beliefs ', 'Normalisation', 'Lack of preparation', 'Fearful acceptance and inevitability' and 'Baby prioritised over mother'. For influence of choices, the themes were: 'External influences from personal stresses', 'Restrictive guidelines', 'Relationship with healthcare professional' and 'Perception of Risk'.
CONCLUSIONS
Evidence on what influences women with obesity's pregnancy choices is limited. Further research is needed on the best methods to discuss the risks of pregnancy and birth for women with obesity in a sensitive and acceptable manner and to identify the key influences when women with obesity make choices antenatally and for birth planning.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31899773
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227325
pii: PONE-D-19-31821
pmc: PMC6941828
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0227325

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Midwifery. 2015 Dec;31(12):1163-7
pubmed: 26365374
BJOG. 2014 Feb;121(3):343-55
pubmed: 24034832
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):10
pubmed: 29384082
Qual Health Res. 2010 Jun;20(6):743-54
pubmed: 20354238
BJOG. 2019 Feb;126(3):e62-e106
pubmed: 30465332
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:54-64
pubmed: 28069317
Midwifery. 2013 Dec;29(12):1287-96
pubmed: 23434033
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Feb 13;17(1):63
pubmed: 28193255
Midwifery. 2016 Jul;38:1-5
pubmed: 27313002
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 27;12:181
pubmed: 23185978
Midwifery. 2011 Aug;27(4):437-44
pubmed: 20483513
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):9
pubmed: 29384078
Matern Child Nutr. 2013 Jul;9(3):309-21
pubmed: 22168548
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Mar 31;17(1):103
pubmed: 28359258
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Oct 11;17(1):351
pubmed: 29020931
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013 Sep;92(9):1101-7
pubmed: 23710944
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2016 Mar-Apr;61(2):217-23
pubmed: 26840998
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:87-94
pubmed: 27756643
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 03;10(11):e0141879
pubmed: 26529600
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Dec;17(10):1879-87
pubmed: 23263891
Women Birth. 2016 Apr;29(2):189-95
pubmed: 26563638
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):222-33
pubmed: 25601510
Midwifery. 2017 Oct;53:87-95
pubmed: 28779644
Qual Health Res. 2014 Apr 11;24(6):790-800
pubmed: 24728109
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:79-86
pubmed: 28011058
Qual Health Res. 2012 Oct;22(10):1435-43
pubmed: 22829486
Matern Child Health J. 2015 Aug;19(8):1698-712
pubmed: 25652058
Midwifery. 2010 Aug;26(4):424-9
pubmed: 19100667
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Jul 10;8:45
pubmed: 18616818
Midwifery. 2017 Jun;49:47-53
pubmed: 27986354
Implement Sci. 2018 Jan 25;13(Suppl 1):2
pubmed: 29384079
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 22;16:625
pubmed: 27449265
BJOG. 2011 Jun;118(7):779-89
pubmed: 21385305
BJOG. 2016 Mar;123(4):529-39
pubmed: 26701735
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jun;100(6):1019-28
pubmed: 20075322
Australas Med J. 2013 Nov 30;6(11):565-77
pubmed: 24348873
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011 Oct 08;11:69
pubmed: 21982306
Midwifery. 2017 Jan;44:1-6
pubmed: 27863294
Midwifery. 2016 Jul;38:21-8
pubmed: 27174012
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Dec;4(12):1025-1036
pubmed: 27743975
Health Expect. 2015 Oct;18(5):969-81
pubmed: 23617245

Auteurs

Sophie Relph (S)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Melissa Ong (M)

Guy's, King's and St Thomas' School of Medical Education, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Matias C Vieira (MC)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Dharmintra Pasupathy (D)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Jane Sandall (J)

Department of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH