Updating goal-setting theory in physical activity promotion: a critical conceptual review.

Exercise goals guidelines health practice psychology

Journal

Health psychology review
ISSN: 1743-7202
Titre abrégé: Health Psychol Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101299723

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 5 1 2020
medline: 26 10 2021
entrez: 5 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Goal-setting is a widely used and accepted strategy for promoting physical activity. Locke and Latham's goal-setting theory is the primary theoretical framework for setting goals in psychology and plays a prominent role in physical activity promotion. Recently, however, there have been calls to reconsider current goal-setting practice in this field. Therefore, we aimed to critically review and update the application of goal-setting theory in physical activity promotion, by examining core developments in this theory since 1990. Current practice relies on setting specific 'performance' goals as a means of increasing physical activity (e.g., 10,000 steps; national physical activity guidelines). This approach was initially consistent with key tenets of goal-setting theory. However, since 1990 this theory has evolved to differentiate between performance and learning goals. Both goal types are context-dependent and it is now recognised that, in some cases, performance goals can even be detrimental to the achievement of desired outcomes. Consequently, current practice may be theoretically appropriate for physically active individuals but a different approach (e.g., learning goals) may be preferable for inactive individuals who are new to physical activity (i.e., most of the population). We conclude by discussing implications for policy, research, and practice in goal-setting for physical activity promotion.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31900043
doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1706616
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

34-50

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Auteurs

Christian Swann (C)

School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia.
Centre for Athlete Development, Experience and Performance, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia.

Simon Rosenbaum (S)

School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Black Dog Institute, Sydney, Australia.

Alex Lawrence (A)

School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia.
Centre for Athlete Development, Experience and Performance, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia.

Stewart A Vella (SA)

Global Alliance for Mental Health and Sport, School of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Wollongong, Australia.

Desmond McEwan (D)

Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.

Panteleimon Ekkekakis (P)

Department of Kinesiology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH