"I just keep thinking that I don't want to rely on people." a qualitative study of how people living with dementia achieve and maintain independence at home: stakeholder perspectives.

Dementia Functioning Independence Psychosocial intervention Qualitative Support systems

Journal

BMC geriatrics
ISSN: 1471-2318
Titre abrégé: BMC Geriatr
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968548

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 01 2020
Historique:
received: 20 05 2019
accepted: 22 12 2019
entrez: 5 1 2020
pubmed: 5 1 2020
medline: 11 11 2020
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Most people living with dementia want to remain in their own homes, supported by family and paid carers. Care at home often breaks down, necessitating transition to a care home and existing interventions are limited. To inform the development of psychosocial interventions to enable people with dementia to live well for longer at home, we qualitatively explored the views of people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals, on how to achieve and maintain independence at home and what impedes this. We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with 11 people living with dementia, 19 professionals and 22 family carers in England. We identified four overarching themes: being in a safe and familiar environment, enabling not disabling care, maintaining relationships and community connectedness, and getting the right support. For people living with dementia, the realities of staying active were complex: there was a tension between accepting support that enabled independence and a feeling that in doing so they were accepting dependency. Their and professionals' accounts prioritised autonomy and 'living well with dementia', while family carers prioritised avoiding harm. Professionals promoted positive risk-taking and facilitating independence, whereas family carers often felt they were left holding this risk. Psychosocial interventions must accommodate tensions between positive risk-taking and avoiding harm, facilitating autonomy and providing support. They should be adaptive and collaborative, combining self-management with flexible support. Compassionate implementation of rights-based dementia care must consider the emotional burden for family carers of supporting someone to live positively with risk.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Most people living with dementia want to remain in their own homes, supported by family and paid carers. Care at home often breaks down, necessitating transition to a care home and existing interventions are limited. To inform the development of psychosocial interventions to enable people with dementia to live well for longer at home, we qualitatively explored the views of people living with dementia, family carers and health and social care professionals, on how to achieve and maintain independence at home and what impedes this.
METHODS
We conducted an inductive thematic analysis of qualitative interviews with 11 people living with dementia, 19 professionals and 22 family carers in England.
RESULTS
We identified four overarching themes: being in a safe and familiar environment, enabling not disabling care, maintaining relationships and community connectedness, and getting the right support. For people living with dementia, the realities of staying active were complex: there was a tension between accepting support that enabled independence and a feeling that in doing so they were accepting dependency. Their and professionals' accounts prioritised autonomy and 'living well with dementia', while family carers prioritised avoiding harm. Professionals promoted positive risk-taking and facilitating independence, whereas family carers often felt they were left holding this risk.
DISCUSSION
Psychosocial interventions must accommodate tensions between positive risk-taking and avoiding harm, facilitating autonomy and providing support. They should be adaptive and collaborative, combining self-management with flexible support. Compassionate implementation of rights-based dementia care must consider the emotional burden for family carers of supporting someone to live positively with risk.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31900113
doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1406-6
pii: 10.1186/s12877-019-1406-6
pmc: PMC6942277
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

5

Subventions

Organisme : Alzheimer's Society UK
ID : Centre of Excellence grant 330
Pays : International

Références

Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999 Feb;14(2):97-105; discussion 105-9
pubmed: 10885861
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019 Nov 2;:null
pubmed: 31679047
Dementia (London). 2019 May;18(4):1237-1272
pubmed: 29149787
Int Psychogeriatr. 2007 Jun;19(3):559-92
pubmed: 17201993
Aging Ment Health. 2012;16(5):576-83
pubmed: 22360274
BMJ. 2000 Jan 1;320(7226):50-2
pubmed: 10617534
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 May;28(5):522-9
pubmed: 22836929
Int J Older People Nurs. 2010 Sep;5(3):235-44
pubmed: 20925707
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2016 May;71(3):491-501
pubmed: 25271308
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
Neurology. 2006 Nov 14;67(9):1592-9
pubmed: 17101889
Gerontologist. 2019 Oct 06;:null
pubmed: 31587053
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018 Jul;33(7):900-906
pubmed: 29468724
Gerontologist. 2013 Dec;53(6):985-97
pubmed: 23339050
Gerontologist. 2019 May 17;59(3):509-518
pubmed: 29546327
BMC Nurs. 2013 Dec 20;12(1):29
pubmed: 24359589
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2017 Mar;30(2):96-103
pubmed: 28073326
Can J Aging. 2006 Summer;25(2):193-205
pubmed: 16821201
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 May 30;:1-7
pubmed: 28556870
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Mar 21;16:68
pubmed: 27001704
Int Psychogeriatr. 2015 Jun;27(6):927-36
pubmed: 25566686
Dementia (London). 2015 Nov;14(6):800-24
pubmed: 24403314
Gerontologist. 2015 Apr;55(2):237-44
pubmed: 26035599
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;22(4):398-414
pubmed: 24502822
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2018 Sep 20;73(7):e1-e85
pubmed: 29947779
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 19;16:21
pubmed: 26787190
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014 May;69(3):419-30
pubmed: 24578371

Auteurs

Penny Rapaport (P)

University College London, London, UK. P.Rapaport@ucl.ac.uk.
UCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor Wing A, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK. P.Rapaport@ucl.ac.uk.

Alexandra Burton (A)

University College London, London, UK.

Monica Leverton (M)

University College London, London, UK.

Ruminda Herat-Gunaratne (R)

University College London, London, UK.

Jules Beresford-Dent (J)

University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

Kathryn Lord (K)

University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

Murna Downs (M)

University of Bradford, Bradford, UK.

Sue Boex (S)

Alzheimer's Society, London, UK.

Rossana Horsley (R)

Alzheimer's Society, London, UK.

Clarissa Giebel (C)

NIHR ARC NWC and Institute of Population Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Claudia Cooper (C)

University College London, London, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH