Automated volumetric assessment with artificial neural networks might enable a more accurate assessment of disease burden in patients with multiple sclerosis.


Journal

European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2020
Historique:
received: 29 08 2019
accepted: 13 11 2019
revised: 09 11 2019
pubmed: 5 1 2020
medline: 6 10 2020
entrez: 5 1 2020
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) regularly undergo MRI for assessment of disease burden. However, interpretation may be time consuming and prone to intra- and interobserver variability. Here, we evaluate the potential of artificial neural networks (ANN) for automated volumetric assessment of MS disease burden and activity on MRI. A single-institutional dataset with 334 MS patients (334 MRI exams) was used to develop and train an ANN for automated identification and volumetric segmentation of T2/FLAIR-hyperintense and contrast-enhancing (CE) lesions. Independent testing was performed in a single-institutional longitudinal dataset with 82 patients (266 MRI exams). We evaluated lesion detection performance (F1 scores), lesion segmentation agreement (DICE coefficients), and lesion volume agreement (concordance correlation coefficients [CCC]). Independent evaluation was performed on the public ISBI-2015 challenge dataset. The F1 score was maximized in the training set at a detection threshold of 7 mm Our results highlight the capability of ANN for quantitative state-of-the-art assessment of volumetric lesion load on MRI and potentially enable a more accurate assessment of disease burden in patients with MS. • Artificial neural networks (ANN) can accurately detect and segment both T2/FLAIR and contrast-enhancing MS lesions in MRI data. • Performance of the ANN was consistent in a clinically derived dataset, with patients presenting all possible disease stages in MRI scans acquired from standard clinical routine rather than with high-quality research sequences. • Computer-aided evaluation of MS with ANN could streamline both clinical and research procedures in the volumetric assessment of MS disease burden as well as in lesion detection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 31900702
doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06593-y
pii: 10.1007/s00330-019-06593-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2356-2364

Subventions

Organisme : Medizinischen Fakultät Heidelberg, Universität Heidelberg
ID : n.a.
Organisme : Else Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
ID : n.a.

Références

Filippi M, Bar-Or A, Piehl F et al (2018) Multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers 4:43
doi: 10.1038/s41572-018-0041-4
Sweeney EM, Shinohara RT, Shiee N et al (2013) OASIS is automated statistical inference for segmentation, with applications to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation in MRI. Neuroimage Clin 2:402–413
doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.03.002
Carass A, Roy S, Jog A et al (2017) Longitudinal multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation: resource and challenge. Neuroimage 148:77–102
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.064
Jesson A, Arbel T (2015) Hierarchical MRF and random forest segmentation of MS lesions and healthy tissues in brain MRI. Proceedings of the 2015 Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation Challenge:1–2
Geremia E, Clatz O, Menze BH, Konukoglu E, Criminisi A, Ayache N (2011) Spatial decision forests for MS lesion segmentation in multi-channel magnetic resonance images. Neuroimage 57:378–390
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.080
Fartaria MJ, Bonnier G, Roche A et al (2016) Automated detection of white matter and cortical lesions in early stages of multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 43:1445–1454
doi: 10.1002/jmri.25095
Commowick O, Cervenansky F, Ameli R (2016) Proceedings of the 1st MSSEG challenge on multiple sclerosis lesions segmentation challenge using a data managementand processing infrastructure. MICCAI-MSSEG
Danelakis A, Theoharis T, Verganelakis DA (2018) Survey of automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation techniques on magnetic resonance imaging. Comput Med Imaging Graph 70:83–100
doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2018.10.002
Aslani S, Dayan M, Storelli L et al (2018) Multi-branch convolutional neural network for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. arXiv:1811.02942
Brosch T, Tang LY, Yoo Y, Li DK, Traboulsee A, Tam R (2016) Deep 3D convolutional encoder networks with shortcuts for multiscale feature integration applied to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35:1229–1239
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2528821
Andermatt S, Pezold S, Cattin PC (2017) Automated segmentation of multiple sclerosis lesions using multi-dimensional gated recurrent units. In: Crimi A, Bakas S, Kuijf H, Menze B, Reyes M (eds) Brainlesion: Glioma, Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injuries. BrainLes 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10670. Springer, Cham
Ghafoorian M, Platel B (2015) Convolutional neural networks for ms lesion segmentation, method description of diag team. Proceedings of the 2015 Longitudinal Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation Challenge:1–2
Valverde S, Cabezas M, Roura E et al (2017) Improving automated multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation with a cascaded 3D convolutional neural network approach. Neuroimage 155:159–168
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.034
Brosch T, Tang LY, Youngjin Y, Li DK, Traboulsee A, Tam R (2016) Deep 3D convolutional encoder networks with shortcuts for multiscale feature integration applied to multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 35:1229–1239
doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2528821
Aslani S, Dayan M, Storelli L et al (2019) Multi-branch convolutional neural network for multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation. Neuroimage 196:1–15
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.068
Saindane AM (2019) Is gadolinium-based contrast material needed for MRI follow-up of multiple sclerosis? Radiology 291:436–437
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190319
Kaunzner UW, Gauthier SA (2017) MRI in the assessment and monitoring of multiple sclerosis: an update on best practice. Ther Adv Neurol Disord 10:247–261
doi: 10.1177/1756285617708911
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B et al (2011) Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol 69:292–302
doi: 10.1002/ana.22366
Kickingereder P, Isensee F, Tursunova I et al (2019) Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 20:728–740
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30098-1
Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC et al (2006) User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31:1116–1128
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
Isensee F, Petersen J, Klein A et al (2018) nnU-Net: self-adapting framework for U-Net-based medical image segmentation. arXiv:1809.10486
Simpson AL, Antonelli M, Bakas S et al (2019) A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithms. arXiv:1902.09063
Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T (2015) U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab N, Hornegger J, Wells W, Frangi A (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015. MICCAI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9351. Springer, Cham
Roy S, Butman JA, Reich DS, Calabresi PA, Pham DL (2018) Multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation from brain MRI via fully convolutional neural networks. arXiv:1803.09172
Marcus DS, Olsen TR, Ramaratnam M, Buckner RL (2007) The Extensible Neuroimaging Archive Toolkit: an informatics platform for managing, exploring, and sharing neuroimaging data. Neuroinformatics 5:11–34
doi: 10.1385/NI:5:1:11
Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F et al (2018) Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol 17:162–173
doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2
Eichinger P, Schon S, Pongratz V et al (2019) Accuracy of unenhanced MRI in the detection of new brain lesions in multiple sclerosis. Radiology 291:429–435
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181568

Auteurs

Gianluca Brugnara (G)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Fabian Isensee (F)

Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Ulf Neuberger (U)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

David Bonekamp (D)

Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Jens Petersen (J)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Ricarda Diem (R)

Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Brigitte Wildemann (B)

Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Sabine Heiland (S)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Wolfgang Wick (W)

Department of Neurology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martin Bendszus (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Klaus Maier-Hein (K)

Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.

Philipp Kickingereder (P)

Department of Neuroradiology, University of Heidelberg Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany. philipp.kickingereder@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH