Systematic Evaluation of Systemic Right Ventricular Function.
3D-Echocardiography
Mustard
Senning
TGA
atrial switch
ccTGA
systemic right ventricle
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Dec 2019
31 Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
12
12
2019
revised:
25
12
2019
accepted:
30
12
2019
entrez:
8
1
2020
pubmed:
8
1
2020
medline:
8
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The right ventricle serves as the subaortic systemic ventricle (sysRV) in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) and in patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) surgically repaired by an atrial switch. SysRV can lead to late complications, primarily heart failure, significant regurgitation of the systemic atrioventricular (AV) valve, and ventricular arrhythmias with sudden cardiac death. We sought to investigate the value of 2D- and 3D-echocardiographic parameters of sysRV function. Consecutive adult patients with sysRV who presented at the adult congenital heart disease outpatient clinic were prospectively enrolled. All patients received comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, including 3D-echocardiography, cardiac magnetic-resonance-imaging (CMR), cardiopulmonary-exercise-testing, and blood analysis for NT-proBNP. A total of 27 patients were included, 18 with TGA and nine with ccTGA. Median age was 37 years (Q1 = 31, Q3 = 44), 44% were male, median NT-proBNP was 189 pg/mL (Q1 = 155, Q3 = 467); sufficient 3D-echocardiography datasets were acquired in 78% of patients. All echocardiographic 2D and 3D volumetric function parameters correlated with CMR data, whereas a correlation was not seen with any of the longitudinal function parameters. NT-proBNP correlated with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (r = -0.43, Systematic evaluation of sysRV is complex and should include not only volumetric parameters but also parameters of longitudinal function in addition to measurement of NT-proBNP. In patients with good image quality, 3D-echocardiography can be used to assess volumes and EF.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The right ventricle serves as the subaortic systemic ventricle (sysRV) in patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) and in patients with transposition of the great arteries (TGA) surgically repaired by an atrial switch. SysRV can lead to late complications, primarily heart failure, significant regurgitation of the systemic atrioventricular (AV) valve, and ventricular arrhythmias with sudden cardiac death. We sought to investigate the value of 2D- and 3D-echocardiographic parameters of sysRV function.
METHODS
METHODS
Consecutive adult patients with sysRV who presented at the adult congenital heart disease outpatient clinic were prospectively enrolled. All patients received comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, including 3D-echocardiography, cardiac magnetic-resonance-imaging (CMR), cardiopulmonary-exercise-testing, and blood analysis for NT-proBNP.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 27 patients were included, 18 with TGA and nine with ccTGA. Median age was 37 years (Q1 = 31, Q3 = 44), 44% were male, median NT-proBNP was 189 pg/mL (Q1 = 155, Q3 = 467); sufficient 3D-echocardiography datasets were acquired in 78% of patients. All echocardiographic 2D and 3D volumetric function parameters correlated with CMR data, whereas a correlation was not seen with any of the longitudinal function parameters. NT-proBNP correlated with tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (r = -0.43,
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Systematic evaluation of sysRV is complex and should include not only volumetric parameters but also parameters of longitudinal function in addition to measurement of NT-proBNP. In patients with good image quality, 3D-echocardiography can be used to assess volumes and EF.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31906129
pii: jcm9010107
doi: 10.3390/jcm9010107
pmc: PMC7019841
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Congenit Heart Dis. 2019 Mar;14(2):176-184
pubmed: 30468301
Can J Cardiol. 2004 Feb;20(2):169-76
pubmed: 15010740
Am Heart J. 2012 May;163(5):859-66
pubmed: 22607865
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017 Jan;30(1):1-27
pubmed: 27838227
Eur Heart J. 2010 Dec;31(23):2915-57
pubmed: 20801927
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
Circulation. 2019 Apr 2;139(14):e801-e813
pubmed: 30586770
Eur J Clin Invest. 2019 Nov;49(11):e13159
pubmed: 31356682
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;15(3):257-66
pubmed: 23946284
Surgery. 1959 Jun;45(6):966-80
pubmed: 13659340
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Feb;109(2):120-7
pubmed: 26850171
Circulation. 2006 Dec 12;114(24):2699-709
pubmed: 17159076
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Jun 13;15:51
pubmed: 23763839
Congenit Heart Dis. 2017 Jul;12(4):448-457
pubmed: 28419713
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 1;35(25):1666-74
pubmed: 24644309
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8
pubmed: 20620859
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Nov;35(11):2001-2008
pubmed: 31236759
Circulation. 2015 Aug 25;132(8):633-8
pubmed: 26185211
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 1;214:54-69
pubmed: 27057977
Surgery. 1964 Mar;55:469-72
pubmed: 14133108
Eur Heart J. 2009 Aug;30(15):1873-9
pubmed: 19465439