UK perspective on the changing landscape of non-invasive cardiac testing.
coronary artery disease
echocardiography
electrocardiography
Journal
Open heart
ISSN: 2053-3624
Titre abrégé: Open Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101631219
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
received:
09
10
2019
revised:
07
11
2019
accepted:
18
11
2019
entrez:
8
1
2020
pubmed:
8
1
2020
medline:
8
1
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To document UK rates of exercise treadmill testing, functional stress testing and CT coronary angiography (CTCA). Specific aims were to determine how rates have changed in the context of changing guideline recommendations within the UK and to identify regional inequalities in the utilisation of testing modalities. Secondary objectives were to compare these trends with national data on revascularisation. 159 acute National Health Service trusts were served Freedom of Information (FOI) requests to provide total numbers of CTCA and functional imaging tests for each financial year from 2011-2012 to 2016-2017. The FOI requests yielded data from 88% of Trusts, increasing from 81.9% in 2011-2012% to 92.1% in 2016-2017. Exercise treadmill tests (ETTs) were performed by over 97% of Trusts. ETT was the most commonly performed diagnostic test in the UK across the study period despite declining by 8.4%. Utilisation of non-invasive stress imaging tests increased by 80.9% during the same period. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and stress echocardiography increased by 25.8% and 73.9%, respectively. The 268% increase in CTCA scans was yet greater. Trends in test utilisation during the study period showed important regional differences between devolved nations. Comparably, only small changes in rates of invasive coronary angiography and revascularisation have been reported during the study period. Non-invasive imaging in UK Trusts has increased substantially since 2010 with only a small decline in use of the ETT and minimal changes in rates of invasive coronary angiography and revascularisation in the same time period.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31908814
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2019-001186
pii: openhrt-2019-001186
pmc: PMC6927513
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e001186Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : DRF-2014-07-008
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(3):539-51
pubmed: 25652080
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:584-6
pubmed: 26569369
BMJ. 2008 Nov 13;337:a2240
pubmed: 19008264
Heart. 2018 Jun;104(11):921-927
pubmed: 29138258
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 31;:null
pubmed: 31504439
N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 11;362(10):886-95
pubmed: 20220183
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):546-53
pubmed: 24515551
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016 Jan 20;2(2):125-140
pubmed: 27042338
Heart. 2017 Jul;103(13):982-986
pubmed: 28446550
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Mar 12;61(10):1054-65
pubmed: 23473411
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Oct 7;161(7):482-90
pubmed: 25285541
Heart. 2007 Apr;93(4):458-63
pubmed: 16790531
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2016 Oct 1;2(4):245-260
pubmed: 29474724
Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):846-52.e2
pubmed: 24890534
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 30;62(5):439-46
pubmed: 23727207
Eur Heart J. 2014 Apr;35(13):844-52
pubmed: 24353280
N Engl J Med. 2018 Sep 06;379(10):924-933
pubmed: 30145934
BMJ. 2006 Feb 4;332(7536):262-7
pubmed: 16415069
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0161153
pubmed: 27536775
BMJ. 2012 Jun 12;344:e3485
pubmed: 22692650
BMJ. 2005 Oct 15;331(7521):869
pubmed: 16210253