Improving the psychometric properties of the dissociative experiences scale (DES-II): a Rasch validation study.
Category response rating
Dissociative experiences
Item response theory
Offenders
Journal
BMC psychiatry
ISSN: 1471-244X
Titre abrégé: BMC Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968559
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 01 2020
07 01 2020
Historique:
received:
01
03
2019
accepted:
19
12
2019
entrez:
9
1
2020
pubmed:
9
1
2020
medline:
21
10
2020
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II) is a self-report questionnaire that measures dissociative experiences such as derealization, depersonalization, absorption and amnesia. The DES-II has been prevalently used as a screening tool in patients suffering from psychotic disorders or schizophrenia. However, dissociative experiences can also be part of normal psychological life. Despite its popularity, the most problematic aspect of the DES-II is the inconsistency in its factor structure, which is probably due to the tendency to treat ordinal responses as responses on an interval scale, as it is assumed in the Classical Test Theory approach. In order to address issues related to the inconsistency of previous results, the aim of the present study was to collect new psychometric evidence to improve the properties of the DES-II using Rasch analysis, i.e. analyzing the functioning of the response scale. Data were obtained on a sample composed by 320 Italian participants (122 inmates and 198 community-dwelling individuals) and were analyzed with the Rasch model. This model allows the estimation of participants' level of dissociation, the degree of misfit of each item, the reliability of each item, and their measurement invariance. Moreover, Rasch estimation allows to determine the best response scale, in terms of response modalities number and their discriminant power. Three items of the scale had strong misfit. After their deletion, the resulting scale was composed by 25 items, which had low levels of misfit and high reliability, and showed measurement invariance. Participants tended to select more often lower categories of the response scale. Results provided new knowledge on the DES-II structure and its psychometric properties, contributing to the understanding and measurement of the dissociation construct.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Dissociative Experiences Scale-II (DES-II) is a self-report questionnaire that measures dissociative experiences such as derealization, depersonalization, absorption and amnesia. The DES-II has been prevalently used as a screening tool in patients suffering from psychotic disorders or schizophrenia. However, dissociative experiences can also be part of normal psychological life. Despite its popularity, the most problematic aspect of the DES-II is the inconsistency in its factor structure, which is probably due to the tendency to treat ordinal responses as responses on an interval scale, as it is assumed in the Classical Test Theory approach. In order to address issues related to the inconsistency of previous results, the aim of the present study was to collect new psychometric evidence to improve the properties of the DES-II using Rasch analysis, i.e. analyzing the functioning of the response scale.
METHODS
Data were obtained on a sample composed by 320 Italian participants (122 inmates and 198 community-dwelling individuals) and were analyzed with the Rasch model. This model allows the estimation of participants' level of dissociation, the degree of misfit of each item, the reliability of each item, and their measurement invariance. Moreover, Rasch estimation allows to determine the best response scale, in terms of response modalities number and their discriminant power.
RESULTS
Three items of the scale had strong misfit. After their deletion, the resulting scale was composed by 25 items, which had low levels of misfit and high reliability, and showed measurement invariance. Participants tended to select more often lower categories of the response scale.
CONCLUSIONS
Results provided new knowledge on the DES-II structure and its psychometric properties, contributing to the understanding and measurement of the dissociation construct.
Identifiants
pubmed: 31910829
doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2417-8
pii: 10.1186/s12888-019-2417-8
pmc: PMC6947857
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
8Références
Assessment. 2002 Mar;9(1):94-106
pubmed: 11911239
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1991 Mar;42(3):297-301
pubmed: 2030014
Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Jan;25(1):1-23
pubmed: 15596078
J Asthma. 2018 Feb;55(2):119-123
pubmed: 28471703
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Jun 03;12:1295-302
pubmed: 27350746
J Trauma Dissociation. 2009;10(1):69-82
pubmed: 19197713
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:338-51
pubmed: 26241024
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2000 Mar;104(1):1-15
pubmed: 10769936
Nord J Psychiatry. 2003;57(1):17-22
pubmed: 12745788
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1986 Nov;12(4):496-516
pubmed: 2946806
J Appl Meas. 2001;2(3):281-311
pubmed: 12011511
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Dec;174(12):727-35
pubmed: 3783140
J Trauma Dissociation. 2006;7(4):55-73
pubmed: 17182493
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 Apr 28;6:26657
pubmed: 25925021
J Trauma Dissociation. 2019 Jul-Sep;20(4):402-419
pubmed: 30714885
J Trauma Dissociation. 2016 May-Jun;17(3):338-61
pubmed: 26507547
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;29(1):45-50
pubmed: 17189745
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 Jul;61(9):975-992
pubmed: 26585993
Assessment. 2018 Jan;25(1):84-98
pubmed: 27178761
Palliat Support Care. 2018 Feb;16(1):50-59
pubmed: 28502266
Assessment. 2008 Dec;15(4):511-21
pubmed: 18390842
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2015 May 13;6:25652
pubmed: 25976478